Brooks Cascadia Elite vs Salomon S/Lab Ultra Glide 2
Two current shoes in the same category with similar stack height and drop, compared on the values in the database. Each cell carries a provenance badge; open a shoe for sources.
- Brooks Cascadia Elite40/34 mm · toe rocker 38 % · heel bevel 12 %
- Salomon S/Lab Ultra Glide 241/35 mm · toe rocker not measured · heel bevel 11 %
| Metric | Brooks Cascadia Elite Trail · Trail | Salomon S/Lab Ultra Glide 2 Trail · Trail |
|---|---|---|
| Heel-to-toe drop | 6 mmDerived | 6 mmDerived |
| Heel stack | 40 mmStated | 41 mmStated |
| Forefoot stack | 34 mmStated | 35 mmStated |
| Weight | 266 gStated | 295 gStated |
| Toe rocker | 38 %est. | — |
| Rocker radius | 47 %est. | — |
| Rocker rise angle | 28 degest. | — |
| Rocker angle at toe | 59 degest. | — |
| Toe tip over ground | 46 mm*est. | 36 mm*est. |
| Visible rocker lift onset | 73.9 %est. | — |
| Toe spring (relative) | 20.8 %est. | 18.7 %est. |
| Heel bevel length | 12.4 %est. | 11.1 %est. |
| Heel bevel height | 19 mm*est. | 12 mmest. |
| Midsole width (forefoot) | 116.9 mmMeasured | — |
| Midsole width (heel) | 100.9 mmMeasured | — |
| Toe box shape | 79 %est. | — |
| Interior forefoot width | 92.6 mmMeasured | — |
| Toebox width | 71.6 mmMeasured | — |
| Longitudinal stiffness | 39Derived | — |
| Midsole firmness | 23Derived | — |
| Plate | Carbon composite | No plate |
| Primary foam | DNA Gold (PEBA) | optiFOAM+ (PEBA/EVA) over optiFOAM EVA |
| List price | $275 | $250 |
Key differences
- Heel-to-toe drop is about the same: 6 mm for Brooks Cascadia Elite, 6 mm for Salomon S/Lab Ultra Glide 2.
- Brooks Cascadia Elite's heel stack is 40 mm, 1 mm thinner than Salomon S/Lab Ultra Glide 2's 41 mm.
- Brooks Cascadia Elite's forefoot stack is 34 mm, 1 mm thinner than Salomon S/Lab Ultra Glide 2's 35 mm.
- Brooks Cascadia Elite's weight is 266 g, 29 g lighter than Salomon S/Lab Ultra Glide 2's 295 g.
Brooks Cascadia Elite details · Salomon S/Lab Ultra Glide 2 details · Add more shoes