ASICS GT-2000 15 vs Hoka Arahi 9
Two current shoes in the same category with similar stack height and drop, compared on the values in the database. Each cell carries a provenance badge; open a shoe for sources.
- ASICS GT-2000 1540/32 mm · apex 68 %
- Hoka Arahi 941/33 mm · apex 66 %
| Metric | ASICS GT-2000 15 Stability · Road | Hoka Arahi 9 Stability · Road |
|---|---|---|
| Heel-to-toe drop | 8 mmStated | 8 mmDerived |
| Heel stack | 40 mmStated | 41 mmMeasured |
| Forefoot stack | 32 mmStated | 33 mmMeasured |
| Weight | 258 gStated | 275 gStated |
| Rocker apex | 68.5 %est. | 66.5 %est. |
| Rocker radius | 36 %est. | 52 %est. |
| Rocker rise angle | 28 degest. | 24 degest. |
| Toe tip over ground | 36 mmest. | 37 mmest. |
| Rocker angle at toe | 61 degest. | 47 degest. |
| Visible rocker lift onset | 78.6 %est. | 75.7 %est. |
| Toe spring (relative) | 17.6 %est. | 16.5 %est. |
| Midsole width (forefoot) | 117.2 mmMeasured | 117.3 mmMeasured |
| Midsole width (heel) | 95.7 mmMeasured | 96 mmMeasured |
| Interior forefoot width | 95.9 mmMeasured | 97 mmMeasured |
| Toebox width | 71.3 mmMeasured | 70.5 mmMeasured |
| Longitudinal stiffness | 27Derived | 39Derived |
| Midsole firmness | 39Derived | 48Derived |
| Plate | No plate | No plate |
| Primary foam | FF Blast Max | CMEVA (dual-density, H-Frame) |
| List price | $150 | $150 |
Key differences
- Heel-to-toe drop is about the same: 8 mm for ASICS GT-2000 15, 8 mm for Hoka Arahi 9.
- ASICS GT-2000 15's heel stack is 40 mm, 1 mm thinner than Hoka Arahi 9's 41 mm.
- ASICS GT-2000 15's forefoot stack is 32 mm, 1 mm thinner than Hoka Arahi 9's 33 mm.
- ASICS GT-2000 15's weight is 258 g, 17 g lighter than Hoka Arahi 9's 275 g.
- ASICS GT-2000 15's rocker onset is 79 % of length, 3 % of length later than Hoka Arahi 9's 76 % of length.
ASICS GT-2000 15 details · Hoka Arahi 9 details · Add more shoes