ASICS GT-2000 15
StabilityRoadNo plate2026Men'sCurrent
Specifications
- Heel-to-toe drop Manufacturer stated
- 8mm
- Heel stack Manufacturer stated
- 40mm
- Forefoot stack Manufacturer stated
- 32mm
- Weight Manufacturer stated
- 258g
- Plate
- No plate
- Primary foam
- FF Blast Max
- List price
- $150
Plate, foam and price from ASICS GT-2000 15 Review (2026) - Doctors of Running.
Geometry
Forefoot: rocker apex later earlierRear: heel stack lower higher not measured
Dashed: average of the catalogue
Percent values are relative to shoe length so they compare across images and sizes; millimetre values are lab measurements from the cited source. See how rocker geometry is defined.
- Rocker apex AI estimated
- 68.5%
- Rocker radius AI estimated
- 36%
- Rocker rise angle AI estimated
- 28deg
- Rocker angle at toe AI estimated
- 61deg
- Toe tip over ground AI estimated
- 36mm
Average of two photos 1.5 mm apart.
- Visible rocker lift onset AI estimated
- 78.6%
- Toe spring (relative) AI estimated
- 17.6%
- Midsole width (forefoot) Externally measured
- 117.2mm
- Midsole width (heel) Externally measured
- 95.7mm
- Interior forefoot width Externally measured
- 95.9mm
- Toebox width Externally measured
- 71.3mm
Stiffness
- Longitudinal stiffness Derived
- 27/ 100
- Midsole firmness Derived
- 39/ 100
How it compares
- ASICS GT-2000 15's heel-to-toe drop is 8 mm, higher than the catalogue median of 6 mm (55% of the 91 other current shoes are lower).
- ASICS GT-2000 15's heel stack is 40 mm, thicker than the catalogue median of 39 mm (57% of the 91 other current shoes are thinner).
- ASICS GT-2000 15's forefoot stack is 32 mm, about the catalogue median of 32 mm (43% of the 91 other current shoes are thinner).
- ASICS GT-2000 15's weight is 258 g, lighter than the catalogue median of 269 g (34% of the 82 other current shoes are lighter).
Compare:ASICS GT-2000 15 vs ASICS GT-2000 13ASICS GT-2000 15 vs Hoka Arahi 9ASICS GT-2000 15 vs New Balance Fresh Foam X 860 v15Previous version: ASICS GT-2000 13
What changed from the ASICS GT-2000 13
Firmness softer, stack higher, toe tip over ground lower. Compared with the previous version in this catalogue; differences within measurement noise are shown as about the same.
- ASICS GT-2000 1540/32 mm · apex 68 %
- ASICS GT-2000 1337/29 mm · apex 69 %
| Measure | ASICS GT-2000 13 | ASICS GT-2000 15 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Heel stack | 36.5 mm | 40 mm | higher (+3.5 mm) |
| Forefoot stack | 28.5 mm | 32 mm | higher (+3.5 mm) |
| Drop | 8 mm | 8 mm | about the same |
| Weight | 269 g | 258 g | lighter (−11 g) |
| Rocker apex | 68.5% of length | 68.5% of length | about the same |
| Toe tip over ground | 40.2 mm | 35.6 mm | lower (−4.6 mm) |
| Rocker rise angle | 26.6° | 28.4° | about the same |
| Stiffness | 40/100 | 27/100 | more flexible (−13) |
| Firmness | 84/100 | 39/100 | softer (−45) |
| Forefoot base width | 115.2 mm | 117.2 mm | about the same |
| Foam | FF Blast+ | FF Blast Max | changed |
Wrong value? Missing data? Tell me
Sources
- ASICS GT-2000 15 Review (2026) - Doctors of RunningreviewBlueprintaccessed 2026-10-03open ↗
- ASICS GT 2000 15 Men's Shoes Midnight/Sunshine | Running Warehouseretailerrunningwarehouse.comaccessed 2026-10-03open ↗
- asics-gt-2000-15 lateral product photoimageRunning Warehouseaccessed 2026-10-03open ↗sha256=b1db28f3e95359be3e0d3abdeb998e289feba95cd970bba758ac802b4843248c; 0.3
- asics-gt-2000-15 medial product photoimageRunning Warehouseaccessed 2026-10-03open ↗sha256=e00730e989cd15fb45f6a241d86935c0183c00d1e19be26dd44560fc4a1e21cf; 0.3
- asics-gt-2000-15 lateral product photoimageRunning Warehouseaccessed 2026-10-03open ↗sha256=56299c384eed144e566fccae09ae6cd15fa7a78b4d5d332df0b91ec110cd8fd3; 0.3
- asics-gt-2000-15 medial product photoimageRunning Warehouseaccessed 2026-10-03open ↗sha256=4c9094d100a35dd7dee28616ad38583035120d71a3da33099905340434b7cdcb; 0.3
- Cut in half: ASICS GT 2000 15 Review (2026) | RunRepeatlabRunRepeat - Athletic shoe reviewsaccessed 2026-10-03open ↗
All approved observations
Every recorded value, including superseded ones. The displayed value per metric is chosen by precedence (measured › stated › derived › AI estimated), then confidence, then recency. 52 further observations awaiting review.
| Metric | Value | Class | Confidence | Method | Source | Recorded |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Heel-to-toe drop | 8 mm | Stated | Medium | regex_specs_v2 | Blueprint | 2026-10-03 |
| Heel stack | 40 mm | Stated | Medium | regex_specs_v2 | runningwarehouse.com | 2026-10-03 |
| Heel stack | 40 mm | Stated | Medium | regex_specs_v2 | Blueprint | 2026-10-03 |
| Forefoot stack | 32 mm | Stated | Medium | regex_specs_v2 | runningwarehouse.com | 2026-10-03 |
| Forefoot stack | 32 mm | Stated | Medium | regex_specs_v2 | Blueprint | 2026-10-03 |
| Weight | 258 g | Stated | Medium | regex_specs_v2 | runningwarehouse.com | 2026-10-03 |
| Weight | 258 g (size 9) | Stated | Medium | regex_specs_v2 | Blueprint | 2026-10-03 |
| Rocker apex | 69 % | est. | Medium | vision_rocker 0.3-bc1 | Running Warehouse | 2026-10-03 |
| Rocker apex | 68.5 % | est. | Medium | vision_rocker 0.3-bc1 | Running Warehouse | 2026-10-03 |
| Rocker radius | 36 % | est. | Medium | vision_rocker 0.3-bc1 | Running Warehouse | 2026-10-03 |
| Rocker radius | 36 % | est. | Medium | vision_rocker 0.3-bc1 | Running Warehouse | 2026-10-03 |
| Rocker rise angle | 28 deg | est. | Medium | vision_rocker 0.3-bc1 | Running Warehouse | 2026-10-03 |
| Rocker rise angle | 29 deg | est. | Medium | vision_rocker 0.3-bc1 | Running Warehouse | 2026-10-03 |
| Toe tip over ground | 36 mm | est. | Medium | vision_rocker 0.3-bc1 | Running Warehouse | 2026-10-03 |
| Rocker angle at toe | 62 deg | est. | Medium | vision_rocker 0.3-bc1 | Running Warehouse | 2026-10-03 |
| Toe tip over ground | 35 mm | est. | Medium | vision_rocker 0.3-bc1 | Running Warehouse | 2026-10-03 |
| Rocker angle at toe | 61 deg | est. | Medium | vision_rocker 0.3-bc1 | Running Warehouse | 2026-10-03 |
| Visible rocker lift onset | 78.6 % | est. | Medium | vision_rocker 0.3-bc1 | Running Warehouse | 2026-10-03 |
| Visible rocker lift onset | 79.1 % | est. | Medium | vision_rocker 0.3-bc1 | Running Warehouse | 2026-10-03 |
| Toe spring (relative) | 17.7 % | est. | Medium | vision_rocker 0.3-bc1 | Running Warehouse | 2026-10-03 |
| Toe spring (relative) | 17.6 % | est. | Medium | vision_rocker 0.3-bc1 | Running Warehouse | 2026-10-03 |
| Midsole width (forefoot) | 117.2 mm | Measured | Medium | lab_table_widths 1 | RunRepeat - Athletic shoe reviews | 2026-10-03 |
| Midsole width (heel) | 95.7 mm | Measured | Medium | lab_table_widths 1 | RunRepeat - Athletic shoe reviews | 2026-10-03 |
| Interior forefoot width | 95.9 mm | Measured | Medium | lab_table_widths 1 | RunRepeat - Athletic shoe reviews | 2026-10-03 |
| Toebox width | 71.3 mm | Measured | Medium | lab_table_widths 1 | RunRepeat - Athletic shoe reviews | 2026-10-03 |
| Longitudinal stiffness | 27 | Derived | Medium | lab_bending_force_score 1 | RunRepeat - Athletic shoe reviews | 2026-10-03 |
| Midsole firmness | 39 | Derived | Medium | lab_midsole_firmness_score 1 | RunRepeat - Athletic shoe reviews | 2026-10-03 |
Classes: Manufacturer stated · Externally measured · AI estimated · Derived · User reported.
Shoes with similar geometry
Compare these →Closest current models from other lines by stack, drop, rocker, toe height, stiffness, firmness, weight and width, whichever both shoes have.
Hoka
Arahi 9
Stability · No plate
- Drop
- 8 mm
- Heel
- 41 mm
- Apex
- 66%
Very close on every shared measure
Mizuno
Wave Inspire 22
Stability · TPU plate
- Drop
- 10 mm
- Heel
- 37 mm
- Apex
- 70%
vs this shoe: 23 g heavier · 2 mm more drop
Adidas
Supernova Rise 3
Daily trainer · No plate
- Drop
- 8 mm
- Heel
- 36 mm
- Apex
- 67%
vs this shoe: 4 mm lower heel · stiffer
ASICS
Novablast 5
Daily trainer · No plate
- Drop
- 8 mm
- Heel
- 41.5 mm
- Apex
- 67%
vs this shoe: 6 mm higher toe · 5 mm wider base