ShoeGeometry

Saucony Omni ST 23

StabilityRoadNo plate2026Men'sCurrent

At a glance

Heel-to-toe drop
8 mmStated
Stack, heel / forefoot
40 / 32 mmStated
Weight
286 gStatedsize 9
Plate
No plate
Toe rocker
32 % of lengthest.photos 27–32 %
Heel bevel
12.4 % of lengthest.photos 9–13 %
Stiffness / firmness
not measured yet
Primary foam
PWRRUN PB core over PWRRUN, TPU stability frame

How it compares

  • Saucony Omni ST 23's heel-to-toe drop is 8 mm, higher than the catalogue median of 6 mm (59% of the 179 other current shoes are lower).
  • Saucony Omni ST 23's heel stack is 40 mm, thicker than the catalogue median of 38 mm (62% of the 176 other current shoes are thinner).
  • Saucony Omni ST 23's forefoot stack is 32 mm, about the catalogue median of 31.5 mm (51% of the 171 other current shoes are thinner).
  • Saucony Omni ST 23's weight is 286 g, heavier than the catalogue median of 269 g (69% of the 167 other current shoes are lighter).
  • 4 shoes with similar geometry from other lines.

Differences smaller than the precision of the sources (about 1 mm of stack, 8 g, or the spread between photos for photo estimates) are reported as about the same.

Specifications

Heel-to-toe drop
Manufacturer stated
8mm
LowSpec listingbrand figure, reported by Doctors of Runningsource
Heel stack
Manufacturer stated
40mm
MediumSpec listingbrand figure, reported by Doctors of Runningsource
Forefoot stack
Manufacturer stated
32mm
MediumSpec listingbrand figure, reported by Doctors of Runningsource
Weight
Manufacturer stated
286g
MediumSpec listingbrand figure, reported by Doctors of Runningsize 9source
Plate
No plate
Primary foam
PWRRUN PB core over PWRRUN, TPU stability frame
List price
$170

Geometry

Catalogue average: heel 38 mm, forefoot 32 mm, toe rocker 35 %Saucony Omni ST 23: heel 40 mm, forefoot 32 mm (drop 8 mm); toe rocker 32 % of length, radius 36 % of length; heel bevel 12 % of length, 24 mm high at the back, ending about under the heel bone.40 mm32 mmUnder the centre of the heel bone: 12 % of length from the heel, where heel stack is measuredheel boneHeel contact: the sole is within 4.5 mm of the ground from 12 % of length (foam compresses more under load), ending about under the heel boneheel bevel 12 %Toe rocker: the front 32 % of the length curves up (the curve leaves the ground 68 % of length from the heel)toe rocker 32 %toeheel
Front: toe rocker shorter longerRear: heel stack lower higher not measured
Dashed: average of the catalogue
Illustrative profile, not a photograph or scan: drawn to scale for a 300 mm shoe from published stack heights and photo estimates of the unloaded shoe (under body weight the foam compresses and the curves flatten). The grey upper is a generic outline, not this shoe’s. Saucony Omni ST 23: heel 40 mm, forefoot 32 mm (drop 8 mm); toe rocker 32 % of length, radius 36 % of length; heel bevel 12 % of length, 24 mm high at the back, ending about under the heel bone. Heel bone: 12 % of length from the heel, where heel stack is measured. Heel bevel and toe rocker are marked where each curve meets the ground; for the heel that is where the sole comes within 4.5 mm of the ground, which foam compression closes under body weight.

Percent values are relative to shoe length so they compare across images and sizes; widths in millimetres are lab measurements from the cited source, while toe tip and heel heights in millimetres are photo estimates converted for a men’s US 9 (assumed 300 mm long), so approximate. See how rocker geometry is defined.

Toe rocker
AI estimated
32%

4 photos range 27–32 %; shown is one of the two that agree most closely.

MediumSide photosource
Rocker radius
AI estimated
36%

4 photos range 31–38 %; shown is one of the two that agree most closely.

LowSide photosource
Rocker rise angle
AI estimated
30deg

4 photos range 30–33 deg; shown is one of the two that agree most closely.

MediumSide photosource
Toe tip over ground
AI estimated
41mm*

4 photos range 34–42 mm; shown is the average of the two that agree most closely (* the photos disagree by more than usual).

MediumSide photosource
Rocker angle at toe
AI estimated
59deg

4 photos range 58–62 deg; shown is one of the two that agree most closely.

MediumSide photosource
Visible rocker lift onset
AI estimated
79%

4 photos range 78.4–82.2 %; shown is one of the two that agree most closely.

MediumSide photosource
Toe spring (relative)
AI estimated
17.7%

4 photos range 17.5–19.8 %; shown is one of the two that agree most closely.

LowSide photosource
Heel bevel length
AI estimated
12.4%*

4 photos range 9.2–12.6 %; shown is the average of the two that agree most closely (* the photos disagree by more than usual).

LowSide photosource
Heel bevel height
AI estimated
24mm*

4 photos range 17–25 mm; shown is the average of the two that agree most closely (* the photos disagree by more than usual).

LowSide photosource
Toe box shape
AI estimated
75%

2 photos range 74–76 %; shown is the average of the two that agree most closely.

LowTop photosource

How it compares

Compare:Saucony Omni ST 23 vs ASICS Gel-Kayano 33Saucony Omni ST 23 vs ASICS GT-1000 15Saucony Omni ST 23 vs ASICS GT-2000 15

Wrong value? Missing data? Tell me
Stored only to improve the site; see privacy.

Sources

  • Saucony Omni 23 ST Review (2026) - Doctors of RunningreviewDoctors of Runningaccessed 2026-10-04open ↗
  • Saucony Omni ST 23 Men's Shoes Dusk/Navy | Running WarehouseretailerRunning Warehouseaccessed 2026-10-04open ↗
  • saucony-omni-st-23 medial product photoimageRunning Warehouseaccessed 2026-10-04open ↗
  • saucony-omni-st-23 medial product photoimageRunning Warehouseaccessed 2026-10-04open ↗
  • saucony-omni-st-23 lateral product photoimageRunning Warehouseaccessed 2026-10-04open ↗
  • saucony-omni-st-23 lateral product photoimageRunning Warehouseaccessed 2026-10-04open ↗
  • saucony-omni-st-23 sole product photoimageRunning Warehouseaccessed 2026-10-04open ↗
  • saucony-omni-st-23 top product photoimageRunning Warehouseaccessed 2026-10-04open ↗
Technical detail: every recorded value, method and version (27)

All approved observations

Every recorded value, including superseded ones. The displayed value per metric is chosen by precedence (measured › stated › derived › AI estimated), then confidence, then recency. 58 further observations awaiting review.

MetricValueClassConfidenceMethodSourceRecorded
Heel-to-toe drop8 mmStatedLowSpec listingDoctors of Running2026-10-04
Heel stack40 mmStatedMediumSpec listingDoctors of Running2026-10-04
Heel stack40 mmStatedMediumSpec listingRunning Warehouse2026-10-04
Forefoot stack32 mmStatedMediumSpec listingRunning Warehouse2026-10-04
Forefoot stack32 mmStatedMediumSpec listingDoctors of Running2026-10-04
Weight286 g (size 9)StatedMediumSpec listingDoctors of Running2026-10-04
Weight286 gStatedMediumSpec listingRunning Warehouse2026-10-04
Rocker apex67.9 %est.LowSide photoRunning Warehouse2026-10-04
Rocker apex67.7 %est.MediumSide photoRunning Warehouse2026-10-04
Rocker radius36 %est.LowSide photoRunning Warehouse2026-10-04
Rocker radius36 %est.LowSide photoRunning Warehouse2026-10-04
Rocker rise angle30 degest.MediumSide photoRunning Warehouse2026-10-04
Rocker rise angle30 degest.LowSide photoRunning Warehouse2026-10-04
Toe tip over ground40 mmest.MediumSide photoRunning Warehouse2026-10-04
Toe tip over ground42 mmest.LowSide photoRunning Warehouse2026-10-04
Rocker angle at toe60 degest.LowSide photoRunning Warehouse2026-10-04
Rocker angle at toe59 degest.MediumSide photoRunning Warehouse2026-10-04
Visible rocker lift onset78.4 %est.LowSide photoRunning Warehouse2026-10-04
Visible rocker lift onset79 %est.MediumSide photoRunning Warehouse2026-10-04
Toe spring (relative)17.7 %est.LowSide photoRunning Warehouse2026-10-04
Toe spring (relative)17.5 %est.LowSide photoRunning Warehouse2026-10-04
Heel bevel length12.2 %est.LowSide photoRunning Warehouse2026-10-04
Heel bevel length12.6 %est.LowSide photoRunning Warehouse2026-10-04
Heel bevel height23 mmest.LowSide photoRunning Warehouse2026-10-04
Heel bevel height25 mmest.LowSide photoRunning Warehouse2026-10-04
Toe box shape76 %est.LowTop photoRunning Warehouse2026-10-04
Toe box shape74 %est.LowTop photoRunning Warehouse2026-10-04

Classes: Manufacturer stated · Externally measured · AI estimated · Derived · User reported. Hover a method for its identifier and algorithm version.

Source notes

  • Running Warehouse: sha256=cb8e0859165a66459a8c12be5a3df2d6fba6fd84099c0f931f2c2aa5b9addd9d; 0.3
  • Running Warehouse: sha256=7d8290b091a8b3745d4ebc04db45e903b46898c5f151f95d57950934e2534a80; 0.3
  • Running Warehouse: sha256=c626ec2736d78365b59ae33e9ba0e4a184b9db38dfa7d828a011400c6b2eda41; 0.3
  • Running Warehouse: sha256=af999b451521e5f01d54a15c205d7c8149c2951b6c578fc97848d363d4ae116d; 0.3
  • Running Warehouse: sha256=55a400f33bbf3c36a8ac62c419655386ce3f15822d5090d2ab73899e40cbdc7c; 0.1
  • Running Warehouse: sha256=9322391f89ee46a08c0b7cf7b98a26196f6568400761e957be5bf68bcc609a25; 0.1

Shoes with similar geometry

Compare these →

Closest current models from other lines by stack, drop, rocker, toe height, stiffness, firmness, weight and width, whichever both shoes have.

Side profile illustration of the Brooks Ghost Trail
Brooks
Ghost Trail
Road/trail hybrid · No plate
Drop
8 mm
Heel
40 mm
Toe rocker
34%

Very close on every shared measure

Side profile illustration of the ASICS Gel-Kayano 33
ASICS
Gel-Kayano 33
Stability · No plate
Drop
8 mm
Heel
41 mm
Toe rocker
35%

Very close on every shared measure

Side profile illustration of the Hoka Arahi 9
Hoka
Arahi 9
Stability · No plate
Drop
8 mm
Heel
41 mm
Toe rocker
34%

Very close on every shared measure

Side profile illustration of the Saucony Endorphin Trainer
Saucony
Endorphin Trainer
Tempo · Carbon plate
Drop
8 mm
Heel
41 mm
Toe rocker
—

Very close on every shared measure