ShoeGeometry

ASICS GT-1000 15

StabilityRoadNo plate2026Men'sCurrent

At a glance

Heel-to-toe drop
8 mmDerived
Stack, heel / forefoot
36 / 28 mmStated
Weight
269 gStated
Plate
No plate
Toe rocker
31 % of lengthest.photos 30–33 %
Heel bevel
10 % of lengthest.rough estimate; photos 8–10 %
Stiffness / firmness
24 / 50 of 100Derived
Primary foam
FF Blast + PureGEL heel

How it compares

  • ASICS GT-1000 15's heel-to-toe drop is 8 mm, higher than the catalogue median of 6 mm (59% of the 179 other current shoes are lower).
  • ASICS GT-1000 15's heel stack is 36 mm, thinner than the catalogue median of 38 mm (28% of the 176 other current shoes are thinner).
  • ASICS GT-1000 15's forefoot stack is 28 mm, thinner than the catalogue median of 31.5 mm (18% of the 171 other current shoes are thinner).
  • ASICS GT-1000 15's weight is 269 g, about the catalogue median of 269 g (50% of the 167 other current shoes are lighter).
  • 4 shoes with similar geometry from other lines.

Differences smaller than the precision of the sources (about 1 mm of stack, 8 g, or the spread between photos for photo estimates) are reported as about the same.

Specifications

Heel-to-toe drop
Derived
8mm
MediumCalculated
Heel stack
Manufacturer stated
36mm
MediumSpec listingbrand figure, reported by Running Warehousesource
Forefoot stack
Manufacturer stated
28mm
MediumSpec listingbrand figure, reported by Running Warehousesource
Weight
Manufacturer stated
269g
MediumSpec listingbrand figure, reported by Running Warehousesource
Plate
No plate
Primary foam
FF Blast + PureGEL heel
List price
$115

Geometry

Catalogue average: heel 38 mm, forefoot 32 mm, toe rocker 35 %ASICS GT-1000 15: heel 36 mm, forefoot 28 mm (drop 8 mm); toe rocker 31 % of length, radius 41 % of length; heel bevel 10 % of length, 17 mm high at the back, ending about under the heel bone.36 mm28 mmUnder the centre of the heel bone: 12 % of length from the heel, where heel stack is measuredheel boneHeel contact: the sole is within 4.5 mm of the ground from 10 % of length (foam compresses more under load), ending about under the heel boneheel bevel 10 %Toe rocker: the front 31 % of the length curves up (the curve leaves the ground 69 % of length from the heel)toe rocker 31 %toeheel
Front: toe rocker shorter longerRear: heel stack lower higher not measured
Dashed: average of the catalogue
Illustrative profile, not a photograph or scan: drawn to scale for a 300 mm shoe from published stack heights and photo estimates of the unloaded shoe (under body weight the foam compresses and the curves flatten). The grey upper is a generic outline, not this shoe’s. ASICS GT-1000 15: heel 36 mm, forefoot 28 mm (drop 8 mm); toe rocker 31 % of length, radius 41 % of length; heel bevel 10 % of length, 17 mm high at the back, ending about under the heel bone. Heel bone: 12 % of length from the heel, where heel stack is measured. Heel bevel and toe rocker are marked where each curve meets the ground; for the heel that is where the sole comes within 4.5 mm of the ground, which foam compression closes under body weight.

Percent values are relative to shoe length so they compare across images and sizes; widths in millimetres are lab measurements from the cited source, while toe tip and heel heights in millimetres are photo estimates converted for a men’s US 9 (assumed 300 mm long), so approximate. See how rocker geometry is defined.

Toe rocker
AI estimated
31%

4 photos range 30–33 %; shown is their median.

MediumSide photosource
Rocker radius
AI estimated
41%

4 photos range 36–41 %; shown is one of the two that agree most closely.

MediumSide photosource
Rocker rise angle
AI estimated
30deg

4 photos range 28–30 deg; shown is their median.

LowSide photosource
Toe tip over ground
AI estimated
38mm

4 photos range 36–39 mm; shown is their median.

LowSide photosource
Rocker angle at toe
AI estimated
55deg

4 photos range 53–59 deg; shown is one of the two that agree most closely.

MediumSide photosource
Visible rocker lift onset
AI estimated
78.3%

4 photos range 75.9–80.1 %; shown is one of the two that agree most closely.

MediumSide photosource
Toe spring (relative)
AI estimated
17.8%

4 photos range 16.6–18.6 %; shown is their median.

MediumSide photosource
Heel bevel length
AI estimated
10%

4 photos range 7.7–10.2 %; shown is the average of the two that agree most closely.

MediumSide photosource
Heel bevel height
AI estimated
17mm

4 photos range 17–19 mm; shown is the average of the two that agree most closely.

MediumSide photosource
Midsole width (forefoot)
Externally measured
119.4mm
MediumLab testsource
Midsole width (heel)
Externally measured
99.8mm
MediumLab testsource
Interior forefoot width
Externally measured
96.9mm
MediumLab testsource
Toebox width
Externally measured
73.3mm
MediumLab testsource

Stiffness

Longitudinal stiffness
Derived
24/ 100

Lab reading: 12.6 N, force to bend the shoe 30° (lab bending test); the score is our 0–100 rescaling of it.

MediumLab flex testsource
Midsole firmness
Derived
50/ 100

Lab reading: 33.6 Asker C, midsole durometer reading (higher = firmer); the score is our 0–100 rescaling of it.

MediumLab durometersource

How it compares

Compare:ASICS GT-1000 15 vs Puma ForeverRun Nitro 3ASICS GT-1000 15 vs Saucony Omni ST 23

Wrong value? Missing data? Tell me
Stored only to improve the site; see privacy.

Sources

  • ASICS GT 1000 15 Men's Shoes Black/Illuminate Yellow | Running WarehouseretailerRunning Warehouseaccessed 2026-10-04open ↗
  • asics-gt-1000-15 medial product photoimageRunning Warehouseaccessed 2026-10-04open ↗
  • asics-gt-1000-15 lateral product photoimageRunning Warehouseaccessed 2026-10-04open ↗
  • asics-gt-1000-15 medial product photoimageRunning Warehouseaccessed 2026-10-04open ↗
  • asics-gt-1000-15 lateral product photoimageRunning Warehouseaccessed 2026-10-04open ↗
  • Cut in half: ASICS GT 1000 15 Review (2026) | RunRepeatlabRunRepeataccessed 2026-10-04open ↗
Technical detail: every recorded value, method and version (28)

All approved observations

Every recorded value, including superseded ones. The displayed value per metric is chosen by precedence (measured › stated › derived › AI estimated), then confidence, then recency. 60 further observations awaiting review.

MetricValueClassConfidenceMethodSourceRecorded
Heel-to-toe drop8 mmDerivedMediumCalculated—2026-10-04
Heel stack36 mmStatedMediumSpec listingRunning Warehouse2026-10-04
Forefoot stack28 mmStatedMediumSpec listingRunning Warehouse2026-10-04
Weight269 gStatedMediumSpec listingRunning Warehouse2026-10-04
Rocker apex68.3 %est.MediumSide photoRunning Warehouse2026-10-04
Rocker apex68.9 %est.LowSide photoRunning Warehouse2026-10-04
Rocker radius41 %est.MediumSide photoRunning Warehouse2026-10-04
Rocker radius40 %est.MediumSide photoRunning Warehouse2026-10-04
Rocker rise angle30 degest.LowSide photoRunning Warehouse2026-10-04
Rocker rise angle30 degest.LowSide photoRunning Warehouse2026-10-04
Toe tip over ground38 mmest.LowSide photoRunning Warehouse2026-10-04
Rocker angle at toe56 degest.LowSide photoRunning Warehouse2026-10-04
Rocker angle at toe55 degest.MediumSide photoRunning Warehouse2026-10-04
Toe tip over ground38 mmest.LowSide photoRunning Warehouse2026-10-04
Visible rocker lift onset77.8 %est.LowSide photoRunning Warehouse2026-10-04
Visible rocker lift onset78.3 %est.MediumSide photoRunning Warehouse2026-10-04
Toe spring (relative)18.6 %est.MediumSide photoRunning Warehouse2026-10-04
Toe spring (relative)18.2 %est.LowSide photoRunning Warehouse2026-10-04
Heel bevel length9.8 %est.MediumSide photoRunning Warehouse2026-10-04
Heel bevel length10.2 %est.MediumSide photoRunning Warehouse2026-10-04
Heel bevel height17 mmest.MediumSide photoRunning Warehouse2026-10-04
Heel bevel height17 mmest.MediumSide photoRunning Warehouse2026-10-04
Midsole width (forefoot)119.4 mmMeasuredMediumLab testRunRepeat2026-10-04
Midsole width (heel)99.8 mmMeasuredMediumLab testRunRepeat2026-10-04
Interior forefoot width96.9 mmMeasuredMediumLab testRunRepeat2026-10-04
Toebox width73.3 mmMeasuredMediumLab testRunRepeat2026-10-04
Longitudinal stiffness24 DerivedMediumLab flex testRunRepeat2026-10-04
Midsole firmness50 DerivedMediumLab durometerRunRepeat2026-10-04

Classes: Manufacturer stated · Externally measured · AI estimated · Derived · User reported. Hover a method for its identifier and algorithm version.

Source notes

  • Running Warehouse: sha256=cd13f8a3f5b2978b7c8a21f25c8ce0dd31ed730e55b19d333f00b00e6045b49f; 0.3
  • Running Warehouse: sha256=cc8a88c07bef9954ff47bff2ff7337a51fd7241d6aed6b576d177375cafa03ed; 0.3
  • Running Warehouse: sha256=61bd5e42693712eedbcb8265171725c3399f34cdebb88eb608ee6e51f1bb041c; 0.3
  • Running Warehouse: sha256=c358e7107db923d67bf5c1b6771825775c47510454336aff17a3c9a4ec49439c; 0.3

Shoes with similar geometry

Compare these →

Closest current models from other lines by stack, drop, rocker, toe height, stiffness, firmness, weight and width, whichever both shoes have.

Side profile illustration of the ASICS Gel-Cumulus 28
ASICS
Gel-Cumulus 28
Daily trainer · No plate
Drop
8 mm
Heel
37.5 mm
Toe rocker
33%

Very close on every shared measure

Side profile illustration of the Saucony Ride TR3
Saucony
Ride TR3
Road/trail hybrid · No plate
Drop
8 mm
Heel
37 mm
Toe rocker
32%

Very close on every shared measure

Side profile illustration of the Salomon Aero Blaze 4 GRVL
Salomon
Aero Blaze 4 GRVL
Road/trail hybrid · No plate
Drop
8 mm
Heel
— mm
Toe rocker
33%

Very close on every shared measure

Side profile illustration of the ASICS GT-2000 15
ASICS
GT-2000 15
Stability · No plate
Drop
8 mm
Heel
40 mm
Toe rocker
31%

vs this shoe: 4 mm higher heel