ASICS Gel-Cumulus 28
At a glance
- Heel-to-toe drop
- 8 mmStated
- Stack, heel / forefoot
- 37.5 / 29.5 mmStated
- Weight
- 259 gStatedmen's UK 9
- Plate
- No plate
- Toe rocker
- 34 % of lengthest.photos 32–34 %
- Heel bevel
- 11 % of lengthest.photos 8–11 %
- Stiffness / firmness
- 30 / 44 of 100Derived
- Primary foam
- FF Blast Max + PureGEL heel
How it compares
- ASICS Gel-Cumulus 28's heel-to-toe drop is 8 mm, higher than the catalogue median of 6 mm (59% of the 179 other current shoes are lower).
- ASICS Gel-Cumulus 28's heel stack is 37.5 mm, about the catalogue median of 38 mm (42% of the 176 other current shoes are thinner).
- ASICS Gel-Cumulus 28's forefoot stack is 29.5 mm, thinner than the catalogue median of 31.5 mm (32% of the 171 other current shoes are thinner).
- ASICS Gel-Cumulus 28's weight is 259 g, lighter than the catalogue median of 269 g (38% of the 167 other current shoes are lighter).
- 4 shoes with similar geometry from other lines.
Differences smaller than the precision of the sources (about 1 mm of stack, 8 g, or the spread between photos for photo estimates) are reported as about the same.
Specifications
- Heel-to-toe drop Manufacturer stated
- 8mm
- Heel stack Manufacturer stated
- 37.5mm
- Forefoot stack Manufacturer stated
- 29.5mm
- Weight Manufacturer stated
- 259g
- Plate
- No plate
- Primary foam
- FF Blast Max + PureGEL heel
- List price
- $145
Geometry
Percent values are relative to shoe length so they compare across images and sizes; widths in millimetres are lab measurements from the cited source, while toe tip and heel heights in millimetres are photo estimates converted for a men’s US 9 (assumed 300 mm long), so approximate. See how rocker geometry is defined.
- Toe rocker AI estimated
- 34%
4 photos range 32–34 %; shown is one of the two that agree most closely.
- Rocker radius AI estimated
- 42%
4 photos range 39–43 %; shown is one of the two that agree most closely.
- Rocker rise angle AI estimated
- 28deg
4 photos range 28–30 deg; shown is one of the two that agree most closely.
- Toe tip over ground AI estimated
- 37mm
4 photos range 35–38 mm; shown is the average of the two that agree most closely.
- Rocker angle at toe AI estimated
- 57deg
4 photos range 57–63 deg; shown is one of the two that agree most closely.
- Visible rocker lift onset AI estimated
- 77.9%
4 photos range 76.3–78.1 %; shown is one of the two that agree most closely.
- Toe spring (relative) AI estimated
- 18.4%
4 photos range 16.9–18.4 %; shown is one of the two that agree most closely.
- Heel bevel length AI estimated
- 11%
4 photos range 8.3–11.3 %; shown is the average of the two that agree most closely.
- Heel bevel height AI estimated
- 25mm
4 photos range 21–25 mm; shown is the average of the two that agree most closely.
- Midsole width (forefoot) Externally measured
- 120.5mm
- Midsole width (heel) Externally measured
- 96.5mm
- Toe box shape AI estimated
- 71%
2 photos range 71–72 %; shown is the average of the two that agree most closely.
- Interior forefoot width Externally measured
- 94.5mm
- Toebox width Externally measured
- 74.4mm
Stiffness
- Longitudinal stiffness Derived
- 30/ 100
Lab reading: 13.7 N, force to bend the shoe 30° (lab bending test); the score is our 0–100 rescaling of it.
- Midsole firmness Derived
- 44/ 100
Lab reading: 31.9 Asker C, midsole durometer reading (higher = firmer); the score is our 0–100 rescaling of it.
How it compares
Appears in:Wide platform
Compare:ASICS Gel-Cumulus 28 vs Adidas Supernova Prima 3ASICS Gel-Cumulus 28 vs Puma Deviate Nitro 4
Wrong value? Missing data? Tell me
Sources
- ASICS GEL-CUMULUS 28 Review | Up & RunningreviewUp & Runningaccessed 2026-10-04open ↗
- ASICS Gel Cumulus 28 Men's Shoes Arctic Blue/Aegean Blu | Running WarehouseretailerRunning Warehouseaccessed 2026-10-04open ↗
- asics-gel-cumulus-28 lateral product photoimageRunning Warehouseaccessed 2026-10-04open ↗
- asics-gel-cumulus-28 medial product photoimageRunning Warehouseaccessed 2026-10-04open ↗
- asics-gel-cumulus-28 medial product photoimageRunning Warehouseaccessed 2026-10-04open ↗
- asics-gel-cumulus-28 lateral product photoimageRunning Warehouseaccessed 2026-10-04open ↗
- Cut in half: ASICS Gel Cumulus 28 Review (2026) | RunRepeatlabRunRepeataccessed 2026-10-04open ↗
- asics-gel-cumulus-28 sole product photoimageRunning Warehouseaccessed 2026-10-04open ↗
- asics-gel-cumulus-28 top product photoimageRunning Warehouseaccessed 2026-10-04open ↗
Technical detail: every recorded value, method and version (33)
All approved observations
Every recorded value, including superseded ones. The displayed value per metric is chosen by precedence (measured › stated › derived › AI estimated), then confidence, then recency. 60 further observations awaiting review.
| Metric | Value | Class | Confidence | Method | Source | Recorded |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Heel-to-toe drop | 8 mm | Stated | Medium | Spec listing | Up & Running | 2026-10-04 |
| Heel stack | 37.5 mm | Stated | Medium | Spec listing | Up & Running | 2026-10-04 |
| Heel stack | 38.5 mm | Stated | Medium | Spec listing | Up & Running | 2026-10-04 |
| Forefoot stack | 29.5 mm | Stated | Medium | Spec listing | Up & Running | 2026-10-04 |
| Forefoot stack | 30.5 mm | Stated | Medium | Spec listing | Up & Running | 2026-10-04 |
| Weight | 259 g (men's UK 9) | Stated | Medium | Spec listing | Up & Running | 2026-10-04 |
| Weight | 255 g | Stated | Medium | Spec listing | Running Warehouse | 2026-10-04 |
| Rocker apex | 66.4 % | est. | Medium | Side photo | Running Warehouse | 2026-10-04 |
| Rocker apex | 66.3 % | est. | Medium | Side photo | Running Warehouse | 2026-10-04 |
| Rocker radius | 41 % | est. | Medium | Side photo | Running Warehouse | 2026-10-04 |
| Rocker radius | 42 % | est. | Medium | Side photo | Running Warehouse | 2026-10-04 |
| Rocker rise angle | 28 deg | est. | Medium | Side photo | Running Warehouse | 2026-10-04 |
| Rocker rise angle | 28 deg | est. | Medium | Side photo | Running Warehouse | 2026-10-04 |
| Toe tip over ground | 37 mm | est. | Medium | Side photo | Running Warehouse | 2026-10-04 |
| Toe tip over ground | 37 mm | est. | Medium | Side photo | Running Warehouse | 2026-10-04 |
| Rocker angle at toe | 57 deg | est. | Medium | Side photo | Running Warehouse | 2026-10-04 |
| Rocker angle at toe | 57 deg | est. | Medium | Side photo | Running Warehouse | 2026-10-04 |
| Visible rocker lift onset | 77.9 % | est. | Medium | Side photo | Running Warehouse | 2026-10-04 |
| Visible rocker lift onset | 78.1 % | est. | Medium | Side photo | Running Warehouse | 2026-10-04 |
| Toe spring (relative) | 18.4 % | est. | Medium | Side photo | Running Warehouse | 2026-10-04 |
| Toe spring (relative) | 18.3 % | est. | Medium | Side photo | Running Warehouse | 2026-10-04 |
| Heel bevel length | 10.8 % | est. | Medium | Side photo | Running Warehouse | 2026-10-04 |
| Heel bevel length | 11.3 % | est. | Medium | Side photo | Running Warehouse | 2026-10-04 |
| Heel bevel height | 25 mm | est. | Medium | Side photo | Running Warehouse | 2026-10-04 |
| Heel bevel height | 24 mm | est. | Medium | Side photo | Running Warehouse | 2026-10-04 |
| Midsole width (forefoot) | 120.5 mm | Measured | Medium | Lab test | RunRepeat | 2026-10-04 |
| Midsole width (heel) | 96.5 mm | Measured | Medium | Lab test | RunRepeat | 2026-10-04 |
| Toe box shape | 72 % | est. | Low | Top photo | Running Warehouse | 2026-10-04 |
| Toe box shape | 71 % | est. | Low | Top photo | Running Warehouse | 2026-10-04 |
| Interior forefoot width | 94.5 mm | Measured | Medium | Lab test | RunRepeat | 2026-10-04 |
| Toebox width | 74.4 mm | Measured | Medium | Lab test | RunRepeat | 2026-10-04 |
| Longitudinal stiffness | 30 | Derived | Medium | Lab flex test | RunRepeat | 2026-10-04 |
| Midsole firmness | 44 | Derived | Medium | Lab durometer | RunRepeat | 2026-10-04 |
Classes: Manufacturer stated · Externally measured · AI estimated · Derived · User reported. Hover a method for its identifier and algorithm version.
Source notes
- Running Warehouse: sha256=deb3b9867a2fede69b79d579df6823f5648f5d15a3068da892c8eee1a15e50b7; 0.3
- Running Warehouse: sha256=6c4b911daf04019a9827e65a62ad57cea1679a15bfcfe04429706cce323597e4; 0.3
- Running Warehouse: sha256=41cdd6f888b2727e315ebc5cedc56adeacdff8d18ad96e9c8e65e898da9eb734; 0.3
- Running Warehouse: sha256=0d8da9ddd325dcc9d6fa9d09a893c0a30a3099b5c137b5b2b9c23f6ed197ec6c; 0.3
- Running Warehouse: sha256=64c59a89240a743ec2da54b08291cba9d77cb0a902bdcad2aedba89f65b109cb; 0.1
- Running Warehouse: sha256=1e8c814d432ce32f9162905a6420a78c009f8b2acc33c62a7424201e157867e2; 0.1
Shoes with similar geometry
Compare these →Closest current models from other lines by stack, drop, rocker, toe height, stiffness, firmness, weight and width, whichever both shoes have.
- Drop
- 8 mm
- Heel
- — mm
- Toe rocker
- 33%
Very close on every shared measure
- Drop
- 8 mm
- Heel
- 36 mm
- Toe rocker
- 32%
Very close on every shared measure
- Drop
- 8 mm
- Heel
- 40 mm
- Toe rocker
- 32%
Very close on every shared measure
- Drop
- 8 mm
- Heel
- 36 mm
- Toe rocker
- 33%
vs this shoe: stiffer