ShoeGeometry

ASICS Gel-Cumulus 28

Daily trainerRoadNo plate2026Men'sCurrent

At a glance

Heel-to-toe drop
8 mmStated
Stack, heel / forefoot
37.5 / 29.5 mmStated
Weight
259 gStatedmen's UK 9
Plate
No plate
Toe rocker
34 % of lengthest.photos 32–34 %
Heel bevel
11 % of lengthest.photos 8–11 %
Stiffness / firmness
30 / 44 of 100Derived
Primary foam
FF Blast Max + PureGEL heel

How it compares

  • ASICS Gel-Cumulus 28's heel-to-toe drop is 8 mm, higher than the catalogue median of 6 mm (59% of the 179 other current shoes are lower).
  • ASICS Gel-Cumulus 28's heel stack is 37.5 mm, about the catalogue median of 38 mm (42% of the 176 other current shoes are thinner).
  • ASICS Gel-Cumulus 28's forefoot stack is 29.5 mm, thinner than the catalogue median of 31.5 mm (32% of the 171 other current shoes are thinner).
  • ASICS Gel-Cumulus 28's weight is 259 g, lighter than the catalogue median of 269 g (38% of the 167 other current shoes are lighter).
  • 4 shoes with similar geometry from other lines.

Differences smaller than the precision of the sources (about 1 mm of stack, 8 g, or the spread between photos for photo estimates) are reported as about the same.

Specifications

Heel-to-toe drop
Manufacturer stated
8mm
MediumSpec listingbrand figure, reported by Up & Runningsource
Heel stack
Manufacturer stated
37.5mm
MediumSpec listingbrand figure, reported by Up & Runningsource
Forefoot stack
Manufacturer stated
29.5mm
MediumSpec listingbrand figure, reported by Up & Runningsource
Weight
Manufacturer stated
259g
MediumSpec listingbrand figure, reported by Up & Runningmen's UK 9source
Plate
No plate
Primary foam
FF Blast Max + PureGEL heel
List price
$145

Geometry

Catalogue average: heel 38 mm, forefoot 32 mm, toe rocker 35 %ASICS Gel-Cumulus 28: heel 38 mm, forefoot 30 mm (drop 8 mm); toe rocker 34 % of length, radius 42 % of length; heel bevel 11 % of length, 25 mm high at the back, ending about under the heel bone.38 mm30 mmUnder the centre of the heel bone: 12 % of length from the heel, where heel stack is measuredheel boneHeel contact: the sole is within 4.5 mm of the ground from 11 % of length (foam compresses more under load), ending about under the heel boneheel bevel 11 %Toe rocker: the front 34 % of the length curves up (the curve leaves the ground 66 % of length from the heel)toe rocker 34 %toeheel
Front: toe rocker shorter longerRear: heel stack lower higher not measured
Dashed: average of the catalogue
Illustrative profile, not a photograph or scan: drawn to scale for a 300 mm shoe from published stack heights and photo estimates of the unloaded shoe (under body weight the foam compresses and the curves flatten). The grey upper is a generic outline, not this shoe’s. ASICS Gel-Cumulus 28: heel 38 mm, forefoot 30 mm (drop 8 mm); toe rocker 34 % of length, radius 42 % of length; heel bevel 11 % of length, 25 mm high at the back, ending about under the heel bone. Heel bone: 12 % of length from the heel, where heel stack is measured. Heel bevel and toe rocker are marked where each curve meets the ground; for the heel that is where the sole comes within 4.5 mm of the ground, which foam compression closes under body weight.

Percent values are relative to shoe length so they compare across images and sizes; widths in millimetres are lab measurements from the cited source, while toe tip and heel heights in millimetres are photo estimates converted for a men’s US 9 (assumed 300 mm long), so approximate. See how rocker geometry is defined.

Toe rocker
AI estimated
34%

4 photos range 32–34 %; shown is one of the two that agree most closely.

MediumSide photosource
Rocker radius
AI estimated
42%

4 photos range 39–43 %; shown is one of the two that agree most closely.

MediumSide photosource
Rocker rise angle
AI estimated
28deg

4 photos range 28–30 deg; shown is one of the two that agree most closely.

MediumSide photosource
Toe tip over ground
AI estimated
37mm

4 photos range 35–38 mm; shown is the average of the two that agree most closely.

MediumSide photosource
Rocker angle at toe
AI estimated
57deg

4 photos range 57–63 deg; shown is one of the two that agree most closely.

MediumSide photosource
Visible rocker lift onset
AI estimated
77.9%

4 photos range 76.3–78.1 %; shown is one of the two that agree most closely.

MediumSide photosource
Toe spring (relative)
AI estimated
18.4%

4 photos range 16.9–18.4 %; shown is one of the two that agree most closely.

MediumSide photosource
Heel bevel length
AI estimated
11%

4 photos range 8.3–11.3 %; shown is the average of the two that agree most closely.

MediumSide photosource
Heel bevel height
AI estimated
25mm

4 photos range 21–25 mm; shown is the average of the two that agree most closely.

MediumSide photosource
Midsole width (forefoot)
Externally measured
120.5mm
MediumLab testsource
Midsole width (heel)
Externally measured
96.5mm
MediumLab testsource
Toe box shape
AI estimated
71%

2 photos range 71–72 %; shown is the average of the two that agree most closely.

LowTop photosource
Interior forefoot width
Externally measured
94.5mm
MediumLab testsource
Toebox width
Externally measured
74.4mm
MediumLab testsource

Stiffness

Longitudinal stiffness
Derived
30/ 100

Lab reading: 13.7 N, force to bend the shoe 30° (lab bending test); the score is our 0–100 rescaling of it.

MediumLab flex testsource
Midsole firmness
Derived
44/ 100

Lab reading: 31.9 Asker C, midsole durometer reading (higher = firmer); the score is our 0–100 rescaling of it.

MediumLab durometersource

How it compares

Appears in:Wide platform

Compare:ASICS Gel-Cumulus 28 vs Adidas Supernova Prima 3ASICS Gel-Cumulus 28 vs Puma Deviate Nitro 4

Wrong value? Missing data? Tell me
Stored only to improve the site; see privacy.

Sources

  • ASICS GEL-CUMULUS 28 Review | Up & RunningreviewUp & Runningaccessed 2026-10-04open ↗
  • ASICS Gel Cumulus 28 Men's Shoes Arctic Blue/Aegean Blu | Running WarehouseretailerRunning Warehouseaccessed 2026-10-04open ↗
  • asics-gel-cumulus-28 lateral product photoimageRunning Warehouseaccessed 2026-10-04open ↗
  • asics-gel-cumulus-28 medial product photoimageRunning Warehouseaccessed 2026-10-04open ↗
  • asics-gel-cumulus-28 medial product photoimageRunning Warehouseaccessed 2026-10-04open ↗
  • asics-gel-cumulus-28 lateral product photoimageRunning Warehouseaccessed 2026-10-04open ↗
  • Cut in half: ASICS Gel Cumulus 28 Review (2026) | RunRepeatlabRunRepeataccessed 2026-10-04open ↗
  • asics-gel-cumulus-28 sole product photoimageRunning Warehouseaccessed 2026-10-04open ↗
  • asics-gel-cumulus-28 top product photoimageRunning Warehouseaccessed 2026-10-04open ↗
Technical detail: every recorded value, method and version (33)

All approved observations

Every recorded value, including superseded ones. The displayed value per metric is chosen by precedence (measured › stated › derived › AI estimated), then confidence, then recency. 60 further observations awaiting review.

MetricValueClassConfidenceMethodSourceRecorded
Heel-to-toe drop8 mmStatedMediumSpec listingUp & Running2026-10-04
Heel stack37.5 mmStatedMediumSpec listingUp & Running2026-10-04
Heel stack38.5 mmStatedMediumSpec listingUp & Running2026-10-04
Forefoot stack29.5 mmStatedMediumSpec listingUp & Running2026-10-04
Forefoot stack30.5 mmStatedMediumSpec listingUp & Running2026-10-04
Weight259 g (men's UK 9)StatedMediumSpec listingUp & Running2026-10-04
Weight255 gStatedMediumSpec listingRunning Warehouse2026-10-04
Rocker apex66.4 %est.MediumSide photoRunning Warehouse2026-10-04
Rocker apex66.3 %est.MediumSide photoRunning Warehouse2026-10-04
Rocker radius41 %est.MediumSide photoRunning Warehouse2026-10-04
Rocker radius42 %est.MediumSide photoRunning Warehouse2026-10-04
Rocker rise angle28 degest.MediumSide photoRunning Warehouse2026-10-04
Rocker rise angle28 degest.MediumSide photoRunning Warehouse2026-10-04
Toe tip over ground37 mmest.MediumSide photoRunning Warehouse2026-10-04
Toe tip over ground37 mmest.MediumSide photoRunning Warehouse2026-10-04
Rocker angle at toe57 degest.MediumSide photoRunning Warehouse2026-10-04
Rocker angle at toe57 degest.MediumSide photoRunning Warehouse2026-10-04
Visible rocker lift onset77.9 %est.MediumSide photoRunning Warehouse2026-10-04
Visible rocker lift onset78.1 %est.MediumSide photoRunning Warehouse2026-10-04
Toe spring (relative)18.4 %est.MediumSide photoRunning Warehouse2026-10-04
Toe spring (relative)18.3 %est.MediumSide photoRunning Warehouse2026-10-04
Heel bevel length10.8 %est.MediumSide photoRunning Warehouse2026-10-04
Heel bevel length11.3 %est.MediumSide photoRunning Warehouse2026-10-04
Heel bevel height25 mmest.MediumSide photoRunning Warehouse2026-10-04
Heel bevel height24 mmest.MediumSide photoRunning Warehouse2026-10-04
Midsole width (forefoot)120.5 mmMeasuredMediumLab testRunRepeat2026-10-04
Midsole width (heel)96.5 mmMeasuredMediumLab testRunRepeat2026-10-04
Toe box shape72 %est.LowTop photoRunning Warehouse2026-10-04
Toe box shape71 %est.LowTop photoRunning Warehouse2026-10-04
Interior forefoot width94.5 mmMeasuredMediumLab testRunRepeat2026-10-04
Toebox width74.4 mmMeasuredMediumLab testRunRepeat2026-10-04
Longitudinal stiffness30 DerivedMediumLab flex testRunRepeat2026-10-04
Midsole firmness44 DerivedMediumLab durometerRunRepeat2026-10-04

Classes: Manufacturer stated · Externally measured · AI estimated · Derived · User reported. Hover a method for its identifier and algorithm version.

Source notes

  • Running Warehouse: sha256=deb3b9867a2fede69b79d579df6823f5648f5d15a3068da892c8eee1a15e50b7; 0.3
  • Running Warehouse: sha256=6c4b911daf04019a9827e65a62ad57cea1679a15bfcfe04429706cce323597e4; 0.3
  • Running Warehouse: sha256=41cdd6f888b2727e315ebc5cedc56adeacdff8d18ad96e9c8e65e898da9eb734; 0.3
  • Running Warehouse: sha256=0d8da9ddd325dcc9d6fa9d09a893c0a30a3099b5c137b5b2b9c23f6ed197ec6c; 0.3
  • Running Warehouse: sha256=64c59a89240a743ec2da54b08291cba9d77cb0a902bdcad2aedba89f65b109cb; 0.1
  • Running Warehouse: sha256=1e8c814d432ce32f9162905a6420a78c009f8b2acc33c62a7424201e157867e2; 0.1
Compare these →

Closest current models from other lines by stack, drop, rocker, toe height, stiffness, firmness, weight and width, whichever both shoes have.