ASICS Trabuco 14 vs Scott Kinabalu Trail
Two current shoes in the same category with similar stack height and drop, compared on the values in the database. Each cell carries a provenance badge; open a shoe for sources.
- ASICS Trabuco 1436/28 mm · toe rocker 31 % · heel bevel 10 %
- Scott Kinabalu Trail37/29 mm · toe rocker not measured
| Metric | ASICS Trabuco 14 Trail · Trail | Scott Kinabalu Trail Trail · Trail |
|---|---|---|
| Heel-to-toe drop | 8 mmDerived | 8 mmStated |
| Heel stack | 36 mmStated | 37 mmStated |
| Forefoot stack | 28 mmStated | 29 mmStated |
| Weight | 278 gStated | 249 gStated |
| Toe rocker | 31 %est. | — |
| Rocker radius | 36 %est. | — |
| Rocker rise angle | 27 degest. | — |
| Rocker angle at toe | 66 degest. | — |
| Toe tip over ground | 39 mmest. | 32 mmest. |
| Visible rocker lift onset | 80.6 %est. | 77.4 %est. |
| Toe spring (relative) | 18 %est. | 14.5 %est. |
| Heel bevel length | 9.6 %est. | — |
| Heel bevel height | 24 mmest. | — |
| Midsole width (forefoot) | 113.5 mmMeasured | — |
| Midsole width (heel) | 89.5 mmMeasured | — |
| Toe box shape | 79 %est. | — |
| Interior forefoot width | 100.3 mmMeasured | — |
| Toebox width | 76.3 mmMeasured | — |
| Longitudinal stiffness | 57Derived | — |
| Midsole firmness | 60Derived | — |
| Plate | Rock plate | No plate |
| Primary foam | FF Blast Max | Kinetic Fusion Foam (EVA/PEBA blend) |
| List price | $145 | $170 |
Key differences
- Heel-to-toe drop is about the same: 8 mm for ASICS Trabuco 14, 8 mm for Scott Kinabalu Trail.
- ASICS Trabuco 14's heel stack is 36 mm, 1 mm thinner than Scott Kinabalu Trail's 37 mm.
- ASICS Trabuco 14's forefoot stack is 28 mm, 1 mm thinner than Scott Kinabalu Trail's 29 mm.
- ASICS Trabuco 14's weight is 278 g, 29 g heavier than Scott Kinabalu Trail's 249 g.
ASICS Trabuco 14 details · Scott Kinabalu Trail details · Add more shoes