Brooks Cascadia 20 vs Puma Voyage Nitro 4
Two current shoes in the same category with similar stack height and drop, compared on the values in the database. Each cell carries a provenance badge; open a shoe for sources.
- Brooks Cascadia 2039/33 mm · toe rocker 36 % · heel bevel 8 %
- Puma Voyage Nitro 438/32 mm · toe rocker 34 % · heel bevel 11 %
| Metric | Brooks Cascadia 20 Trail · Trail | Puma Voyage Nitro 4 Trail · Trail |
|---|---|---|
| Heel-to-toe drop | 6 mmDerived | 6 mmStated |
| Heel stack | 39 mmStated | 38 mmStated |
| Forefoot stack | 33 mmStated | 32 mmStated |
| Weight | 306 gStated | 272 gStated |
| Toe rocker | 36 %est. | 34 %est. |
| Rocker radius | 44 %est. | 41 %est. |
| Rocker rise angle | 28 degest. | 31 degest. |
| Rocker angle at toe | 60 degest. | 63 degest. |
| Toe tip over ground | 44 mm*est. | 42 mm*est. |
| Visible rocker lift onset | 76.3 %est. | 74.4 %est. |
| Toe spring (relative) | 19.4 %est. | 20.8 %est. |
| Heel bevel length | 7.7 %*est. | 11.1 %est. |
| Heel bevel height | 23 mm*est. | 17 mmest. |
| Midsole width (forefoot) | 117.7 mmMeasured | — |
| Midsole width (heel) | 98.5 mmMeasured | — |
| Toe box shape | — | 75 %est. |
| Interior forefoot width | 93.7 mmMeasured | — |
| Toebox width | 70.6 mmMeasured | — |
| Longitudinal stiffness | 53Derived | — |
| Midsole firmness | 74Derived | — |
| Plate | Rock plate | No plate |
| Primary foam | DNA Flash v2 | NITROFOAM |
| List price | $160 | $160 |
Key differences
- Heel-to-toe drop is about the same: 6 mm for Brooks Cascadia 20, 6 mm for Puma Voyage Nitro 4.
- Brooks Cascadia 20's heel stack is 39 mm, 1 mm thicker than Puma Voyage Nitro 4's 38 mm.
- Brooks Cascadia 20's forefoot stack is 33 mm, 1 mm thicker than Puma Voyage Nitro 4's 32 mm.
- Brooks Cascadia 20's weight is 306 g, 34 g heavier than Puma Voyage Nitro 4's 272 g.
- Toe rocker is about the same: 36 % of length for Brooks Cascadia 20, 34 % of length for Puma Voyage Nitro 4.
Brooks Cascadia 20 details · Puma Voyage Nitro 4 details · Add more shoes