ShoeGeometry

Puma Voyage Nitro 4

TrailTrailNo plate2025Men'sCurrent

At a glance

Heel-to-toe drop
6 mmStated
Stack, heel / forefoot
38 / 32 mmStated
Weight
272 gStated
Plate
No plate
Toe rocker
34 % of lengthest.photos 34–35 %
Heel bevel
11.1 % of lengthest.rough estimate; photos 11–12 %
Stiffness / firmness
not measured yet
Primary foam
NITROFOAM

How it compares

  • Puma Voyage Nitro 4's heel-to-toe drop is 6 mm, about the catalogue median of 6 mm (25% of the 179 other current shoes are lower).
  • Puma Voyage Nitro 4's heel stack is 38 mm, about the catalogue median of 38 mm (43% of the 176 other current shoes are thinner).
  • Puma Voyage Nitro 4's forefoot stack is 32 mm, about the catalogue median of 31.5 mm (51% of the 171 other current shoes are thinner).
  • Puma Voyage Nitro 4's weight is 272 g, about the catalogue median of 269 g (54% of the 167 other current shoes are lighter).
  • 4 shoes with similar geometry from other lines.

Differences smaller than the precision of the sources (about 1 mm of stack, 8 g, or the spread between photos for photo estimates) are reported as about the same.

Specifications

Heel-to-toe drop
Manufacturer stated
6mm
HighSpec listingsource
Heel stack
Manufacturer stated
38mm
HighSpec listingsource
Forefoot stack
Manufacturer stated
32mm
HighSpec listingsource
Weight
Manufacturer stated
272g
MediumSpec listingbrand figure, reported by Running Warehousesource
Plate
No plate
Primary foam
NITROFOAM
List price
$160

Plate, foam and price from Voyage NITRO™ 4 Men's Trail Running Shoes | PUMA.

Geometry

Catalogue average: heel 38 mm, forefoot 32 mm, toe rocker 35 %Puma Voyage Nitro 4: heel 38 mm, forefoot 32 mm (drop 6 mm); toe rocker 34 % of length, radius 41 % of length; heel bevel 11 % of length, 17 mm high at the back, ending about under the heel bone.38 mm32 mmUnder the centre of the heel bone: 12 % of length from the heel, where heel stack is measuredheel boneHeel contact: the sole is within 4.5 mm of the ground from 11 % of length (foam compresses more under load), ending about under the heel boneheel bevel 11 %Toe rocker: the front 34 % of the length curves up (the curve leaves the ground 66 % of length from the heel)toe rocker 34 %toeheel
Front: toe rocker shorter longerRear: heel stack lower higher not measured
Dashed: average of the catalogue
Illustrative profile, not a photograph or scan: drawn to scale for a 300 mm shoe from published stack heights and photo estimates of the unloaded shoe (under body weight the foam compresses and the curves flatten). The grey upper is a generic outline, not this shoe’s. Puma Voyage Nitro 4: heel 38 mm, forefoot 32 mm (drop 6 mm); toe rocker 34 % of length, radius 41 % of length; heel bevel 11 % of length, 17 mm high at the back, ending about under the heel bone. Heel bone: 12 % of length from the heel, where heel stack is measured. Heel bevel and toe rocker are marked where each curve meets the ground; for the heel that is where the sole comes within 4.5 mm of the ground, which foam compression closes under body weight.

Percent values are relative to shoe length so they compare across images and sizes; widths in millimetres are lab measurements from the cited source, while toe tip and heel heights in millimetres are photo estimates converted for a men’s US 9 (assumed 300 mm long), so approximate. See how rocker geometry is defined.

Toe rocker
AI estimated
34%

4 photos range 34–35 %; shown is their median.

LowSide photosource
Rocker radius
AI estimated
41%

4 photos range 41–42 %; shown is one of the two that agree most closely.

LowSide photosource
Rocker rise angle
AI estimated
31deg

4 photos range 30–32 deg; shown is their median.

LowSide photosource
Toe tip over ground
AI estimated
42mm*

4 photos range 41–45 mm; shown is their median (* the photos disagree by more than usual).

LowSide photosource
Rocker angle at toe
AI estimated
63deg

4 photos range 62–65 deg; shown is one of the two that agree most closely.

LowSide photosource
Visible rocker lift onset
AI estimated
74.4%

4 photos range 74.4–76.4 %; shown is one of the two that agree most closely.

LowSide photosource
Toe spring (relative)
AI estimated
20.8%

4 photos range 20.1–21.3 %; shown is their median.

LowSide photosource
Heel bevel length
AI estimated
11.1%

4 photos range 10.6–11.6 %; shown is the average of the two that agree most closely.

LowSide photosource
Heel bevel height
AI estimated
17mm

4 photos range 17–18 mm; shown is the average of the two that agree most closely.

LowSide photosource
Toe box shape
AI estimated
75%

2 photos range 74–75 %; shown is the average of the two that agree most closely.

LowTop photosource

How it compares

Compare:Puma Voyage Nitro 4 vs Brooks Cascadia 20

Wrong value? Missing data? Tell me
Stored only to improve the site; see privacy.

Sources

  • PUMA Voyage Nitro 4 Men's Shoes Lux Army/Warm White | Running WarehouseretailerRunning Warehouseaccessed 2026-10-04open ↗
  • Voyage NITRO™ 4 Men's Trail Running Shoes | PUMAmanufacturerPUMAaccessed 2026-10-04open ↗
  • puma-voyage-nitro-4 medial product photoimageRunning Warehouseaccessed 2026-10-04open ↗
  • puma-voyage-nitro-4 medial product photoimageRunning Warehouseaccessed 2026-10-04open ↗
  • puma-voyage-nitro-4 lateral product photoimageRunning Warehouseaccessed 2026-10-04open ↗
  • puma-voyage-nitro-4 lateral product photoimageRunning Warehouseaccessed 2026-10-04open ↗
  • puma-voyage-nitro-4 sole product photoimageRunning Warehouseaccessed 2026-10-04open ↗
  • puma-voyage-nitro-4 top product photoimageRunning Warehouseaccessed 2026-10-04open ↗
Technical detail: every recorded value, method and version (27)

All approved observations

Every recorded value, including superseded ones. The displayed value per metric is chosen by precedence (measured › stated › derived › AI estimated), then confidence, then recency. 58 further observations awaiting review.

MetricValueClassConfidenceMethodSourceRecorded
Heel-to-toe drop6 mmStatedMediumSpec listingRunning Warehouse2026-10-04
Heel-to-toe drop6 mmStatedHighSpec listingPUMA2026-10-04
Heel stack38 mmStatedHighSpec listingPUMA2026-10-04
Heel stack39 mmStatedMediumSpec listingRunning Warehouse2026-10-04
Forefoot stack33 mmStatedMediumSpec listingRunning Warehouse2026-10-04
Forefoot stack32 mmStatedHighSpec listingPUMA2026-10-04
Weight272 gStatedMediumSpec listingRunning Warehouse2026-10-04
Rocker apex65.6 %est.LowSide photoRunning Warehouse2026-10-04
Rocker apex65.9 %est.LowSide photoRunning Warehouse2026-10-04
Rocker radius41 %est.LowSide photoRunning Warehouse2026-10-04
Rocker radius41 %est.LowSide photoRunning Warehouse2026-10-04
Rocker rise angle31 degest.LowSide photoRunning Warehouse2026-10-04
Rocker rise angle30 degest.LowSide photoRunning Warehouse2026-10-04
Toe tip over ground41 mmest.LowSide photoRunning Warehouse2026-10-04
Rocker angle at toe63 degest.LowSide photoRunning Warehouse2026-10-04
Rocker angle at toe63 degest.LowSide photoRunning Warehouse2026-10-04
Toe tip over ground41 mmest.LowSide photoRunning Warehouse2026-10-04
Visible rocker lift onset74.4 %est.LowSide photoRunning Warehouse2026-10-04
Visible rocker lift onset74.8 %est.LowSide photoRunning Warehouse2026-10-04
Toe spring (relative)21.3 %est.LowSide photoRunning Warehouse2026-10-04
Toe spring (relative)21.1 %est.LowSide photoRunning Warehouse2026-10-04
Heel bevel length10.9 %est.LowSide photoRunning Warehouse2026-10-04
Heel bevel length11.2 %est.LowSide photoRunning Warehouse2026-10-04
Heel bevel height17 mmest.LowSide photoRunning Warehouse2026-10-04
Heel bevel height17 mmest.LowSide photoRunning Warehouse2026-10-04
Toe box shape74 %est.LowTop photoRunning Warehouse2026-10-04
Toe box shape75 %est.LowTop photoRunning Warehouse2026-10-04

Classes: Manufacturer stated · Externally measured · AI estimated · Derived · User reported. Hover a method for its identifier and algorithm version.

Source notes

  • Running Warehouse: sha256=1e4ca4e32a3baea4308c0feecd1f35d1ac6b1fca9007ab50908625c70d98d078; 0.3
  • Running Warehouse: sha256=13cb026d6dd2f5e3e8d2377e6050aac8738e071c92ada2fbce4bf70568f2eb1d; 0.3
  • Running Warehouse: sha256=654112f72c20ecf420624c65105ea73d7844b7dd31d588287d00970dc608aaf7; 0.3
  • Running Warehouse: sha256=c304a73e1d988cf20b2f0371b76ce72293c9f38f170b002f636404dea4302943; 0.3
  • Running Warehouse: sha256=be9eb3460adf3acb11ac7ee3db98c41502ed12c01ed0cd3ac6dd6a1062df1f8f; 0.1
  • Running Warehouse: sha256=e97153f0695e8732e4ea5fbaa1946aade4dd061345c497676cdd279cc50852a6; 0.1

Shoes with similar geometry

Compare these →

Closest current models from other lines by stack, drop, rocker, toe height, stiffness, firmness, weight and width, whichever both shoes have.

Side profile illustration of the VJ Ultra 3
VJ
Ultra 3
Trail · Rock plate
Drop
8 mm
Heel
38 mm
Toe rocker
—

vs this shoe: 2 mm more drop

Side profile illustration of the Hoka Tecton X 4
Hoka
Tecton X 4
Trail · Carbon plate
Drop
5 mm
Heel
39 mm
Toe rocker
37%

Very close on every shared measure

Side profile illustration of the Salomon Ultra Glide 4
Salomon
Ultra Glide 4
Trail · No plate
Drop
6 mm
Heel
41 mm
Toe rocker
36%

vs this shoe: 3 mm higher heel

Side profile illustration of the Saucony Xodus Ultra 4
Saucony
Xodus Ultra 4
Trail · No plate
Drop
6 mm
Heel
38 mm
Toe rocker
37%

Very close on every shared measure