Hoka Cielo X1 2.0 vs Saucony Endorphin Elite 3
Two current shoes in the same category with similar stack height and drop, compared on the values in the database. Each cell carries a provenance badge; open a shoe for sources.
- Hoka Cielo X1 2.046/39 mm · apex 54 %
- Saucony Endorphin Elite 340/32 mm · apex 69 %
| Metric | Hoka Cielo X1 2.0 Racing · Road | Saucony Endorphin Elite 3 Racing · Road |
|---|---|---|
| Heel-to-toe drop | 7 mmStated | 8 mmStated |
| Heel stack | 46 mmStated | 40 mmStated |
| Forefoot stack | 39 mmStated | 32 mmStated |
| Weight | 230 gStated | 207 gStated |
| Rocker apex | 53.6 %est. | 69.3 %est. |
| Rocker radius | 62 %est. | 33 %est. |
| Rocker rise angle | 27 degest. | 36 degest. |
| Toe tip over ground | 58 mmest. | 44 mmest. |
| Rocker angle at toe | 53 degest. | 63 degest. |
| Visible rocker lift onset | 66.6 %est. | 78 %est. |
| Toe spring (relative) | 24.2 %est. | 21.6 %est. |
| Midsole width (forefoot) | — | 116.2 mmMeasured |
| Midsole width (heel) | — | 94.2 mmMeasured |
| Interior forefoot width | — | 93.8 mmMeasured |
| Toebox width | — | 71.8 mmMeasured |
| Longitudinal stiffness | — | 54Derived |
| Midsole firmness | — | 0Derived |
| Plate | Carbon plate | Carbon plate |
| Primary foam | Dual-layer PEBA | IncrediRUN |
| List price | $275 | $290 |
Key differences
- Hoka Cielo X1 2.0's heel-to-toe drop is 7 mm, 1 mm lower than Saucony Endorphin Elite 3's 8 mm.
- Hoka Cielo X1 2.0's heel stack is 46 mm, 7 mm thicker than Saucony Endorphin Elite 3's 40 mm.
- Hoka Cielo X1 2.0's forefoot stack is 39 mm, 8 mm thicker than Saucony Endorphin Elite 3's 32 mm.
- Hoka Cielo X1 2.0's weight is 230 g, 23 g heavier than Saucony Endorphin Elite 3's 207 g.
- Hoka Cielo X1 2.0's rocker onset is 67 % of length, 11 % of length earlier than Saucony Endorphin Elite 3's 78 % of length.
Hoka Cielo X1 2.0 details · Saucony Endorphin Elite 3 details · Add more shoes