Hoka Clifton 10 vs Mizuno Wave Rider 30
Two current shoes in the same category with similar stack height and drop, compared on the values in the database. Each cell carries a provenance badge; open a shoe for sources.
- Hoka Clifton 1043/35 mm · apex 63 %
- Mizuno Wave Rider 3043/35 mm · apex 72 %
| Metric | Hoka Clifton 10 Daily trainer · Road | Mizuno Wave Rider 30 Daily trainer · Road |
|---|---|---|
| Heel-to-toe drop | 8 mmStated | 8 mmStated |
| Heel stack | 43 mmStated | 43 mmStated |
| Forefoot stack | 35 mmStated | 35 mmStated |
| Weight | 278 gStated | 266 gStated |
| Rocker apex | 62.8 %est. | 71.8 %est. |
| Rocker radius | 48 %est. | 31 %est. |
| Rocker rise angle | 27 degest. | 33 degest. |
| Toe tip over ground | 42 mmest. | 39 mmest. |
| Rocker angle at toe | 62 degest. | 59 degest. |
| Visible rocker lift onset | 74.5 %est. | 80.5 %est. |
| Toe spring (relative) | 19.2 %est. | 18.1 %est. |
| Midsole width (forefoot) | 116.9 mmMeasured | 117.2 mmMeasured |
| Midsole width (heel) | 94.5 mmMeasured | 90.6 mmMeasured |
| Interior forefoot width | 97.2 mmMeasured | 95.3 mmMeasured |
| Toebox width | 73.1 mmMeasured | 73.3 mmMeasured |
| Longitudinal stiffness | 35Derived | 54Derived |
| Midsole firmness | 53Derived | 51Derived |
| Plate | No plate | TPU plate |
| Primary foam | CMEVA (compression-moulded EVA) | Mizuno Enerzy NXT |
| List price | $150 | $150 |
Key differences
- Heel-to-toe drop is about the same: 8 mm for Hoka Clifton 10, 8 mm for Mizuno Wave Rider 30.
- Hoka Clifton 10's heel stack is 43 mm, 1 mm thicker than Mizuno Wave Rider 30's 43 mm.
- Hoka Clifton 10's forefoot stack is 35 mm, 1 mm thicker than Mizuno Wave Rider 30's 35 mm.
- Hoka Clifton 10's weight is 278 g, 12 g heavier than Mizuno Wave Rider 30's 266 g.
- Hoka Clifton 10's rocker onset is 74 % of length, 6 % of length earlier than Mizuno Wave Rider 30's 80 % of length.
Hoka Clifton 10 details · Mizuno Wave Rider 30 details · Add more shoes