ASICS GlideRide Max 2 vs Nike Vomero Plus
Two popular shoes in the same category, compared on measured geometry. Each cell carries a provenance badge; open a shoe for sources.
- ASICS GlideRide Max 246/40 mm · toe rocker 36 % · heel bevel 9 %
- Nike Vomero Plus45/35 mm · toe rocker 30 % · heel bevel 12 %
Which suits you
| If you want | Pick | Because |
|---|---|---|
| A smoother roll at toe-off | ASICS GlideRide Max 2 | 36.3 vs 29.9 % toe rocker |
| More cushioning under the heel | About the same | 46 vs 45 mm heel stack |
| More under the forefoot | ASICS GlideRide Max 2 | 40 vs 35 mm forefoot stack |
| A lower drop | ASICS GlideRide Max 2 | 6 vs 10 mm drop |
| A stiffer, snappier forefoot | Nike Vomero Plus | 50 vs 62 /100 stiffness |
| A firmer, more stable feel | About the same | 47 vs 46 /100 firmness |
| A wider base under the forefoot | About the same | 115 vs 117 mm forefoot base |
From the values below, with differences inside measurement noise shown as about the same. This describes the shoes, not what is right for your feet; comfort in the first few runs decides.
| Metric | ASICS GlideRide Max 2 Max cushion · Road | Nike Vomero Plus Max cushion · Road |
|---|---|---|
| Heel-to-toe drop | 6 mmStated | 10 mmStated |
| Heel stack | 46 mmStated | 45 mmStated |
| Forefoot stack | 40 mmStated | 35 mmStated |
| Weight | 261 gStated | 292 gStated |
| Toe rocker | 36 %est. | 30 %est. |
| Rocker radius | 42 %est. | 35 %est. |
| Rocker rise angle | 32 degest. | 27 degest. |
| Rocker angle at toe | 67 degest. | 45 degest. |
| Toe tip over ground | 47 mm*est. | 36 mm*est. |
| Visible rocker lift onset | 74 %est. | 81.5 %est. |
| Toe spring (relative) | 22.8 %est. | 15.4 %est. |
| Heel bevel length | 9 %*est. | 11.9 %*est. |
| Heel bevel height | 18 mm*est. | 24 mm*est. |
| Midsole width (forefoot) | 115 mmMeasured | 117 mmMeasured |
| Midsole width (heel) | 93.5 mmMeasured | 99.2 mmMeasured |
| Toe box shape | 79 %est. | 73 %*est. |
| Interior forefoot width | 96.1 mmMeasured | 94.6 mmMeasured |
| Toebox width | 72.6 mmMeasured | 71.1 mmMeasured |
| Longitudinal stiffness | 50Derived | 62Derived |
| Midsole firmness | 47Derived | 46Derived |
| Plate | Plate unknown | No plate |
| Primary foam | FF Blast+ | ZoomX |
| List price | $170 | $180 |
Key differences
- ASICS GlideRide Max 2's heel-to-toe drop is 6 mm, 4 mm lower than Nike Vomero Plus's 10 mm.
- ASICS GlideRide Max 2's heel stack is 46 mm, 1 mm thicker than Nike Vomero Plus's 45 mm.
- ASICS GlideRide Max 2's forefoot stack is 40 mm, 5 mm thicker than Nike Vomero Plus's 35 mm.
- ASICS GlideRide Max 2's weight is 261 g, 31 g lighter than Nike Vomero Plus's 292 g.
- ASICS GlideRide Max 2's toe rocker is 36 % of length, 6 % of length longer than Nike Vomero Plus's 30 % of length.
Read more about both shoes
We measure the shape. For how they feel over many miles, and for lab tests of cushioning, grip and fit:
Nike Vomero Plus
- Believe in the Run · tester review
- RTINGS · lab test
- RunRepeat · lab test
Independent sites; we are not affiliated with them.
ASICS GlideRide Max 2 details · Nike Vomero Plus details · Add more shoes