ShoeGeometry

ASICS GT-2000 15 vs Saucony Omni ST 23

Two current shoes in the same category with similar stack height and drop, compared on the values in the database. Each cell carries a provenance badge; open a shoe for sources.

heel boneASICS GT-2000 15: heel 40 mm, forefoot 32 mm (drop 8 mm); toe rocker 32 % of length, radius 36 % of length; heel bevel 7 % of length, 15 mm high at the back, ending behind the heel bone (only the back edge is rounded).ASICS GT-2000 15: toe rocker 32 % of lengthSaucony Omni ST 23: heel 40 mm, forefoot 32 mm (drop 8 mm); toe rocker 32 % of length, radius 36 % of length; heel bevel 12 % of length, 24 mm high at the back, ending about under the heel bone.Saucony Omni ST 23: toe rocker 32 % of length
  • ASICS GT-2000 1540/32 mm · toe rocker 32 % · heel bevel 7 %
  • Saucony Omni ST 2340/32 mm · toe rocker 32 % · heel bevel 12 %
Illustrative profiles, not photographs: drawn from published stack heights and photo estimates of the unloaded shoes on a common length (300 mm), heels aligned, toe to the left; dots mark where each toe rocker starts; the dotted vertical line is under the heel bone (12 % of length), so a heel curve reaching past it is a bevel in front of the heel bone. Dotted lines use typical values where a shoe has no measurement. Exact values are in the table below.
MetricASICS GT-2000 15
Stability · Road
Saucony Omni ST 23
Stability · Road
Heel-to-toe drop8 mmStated8 mmStated
Heel stack40 mmStated40 mmStated
Forefoot stack32 mmStated32 mmStated
Weight258 gStated286 gStated
Toe rocker32 %est.32 %est.
Rocker radius36 %est.36 %est.
Rocker rise angle28 degest.30 degest.
Rocker angle at toe61 degest.59 degest.
Toe tip over ground36 mm*est.41 mm*est.
Visible rocker lift onset78.6 %est.79 %est.
Toe spring (relative)17.6 %est.17.7 %est.
Heel bevel length7.1 %est.12.4 %*est.
Heel bevel height15 mm*est.24 mm*est.
Midsole width (forefoot)117.2 mmMeasured—
Midsole width (heel)95.7 mmMeasured—
Toe box shape—75 %est.
Interior forefoot width95.9 mmMeasured—
Toebox width71.3 mmMeasured—
Longitudinal stiffness27Derived—
Midsole firmness39Derived—
PlateNo plateNo plate
Primary foamFF Blast MaxPWRRUN PB core over PWRRUN, TPU stability frame
List price$150$170

Key differences

  • Heel-to-toe drop is about the same: 8 mm for ASICS GT-2000 15, 8 mm for Saucony Omni ST 23.
  • Heel stack is about the same: 40 mm for ASICS GT-2000 15, 40 mm for Saucony Omni ST 23.
  • Forefoot stack is about the same: 32 mm for ASICS GT-2000 15, 32 mm for Saucony Omni ST 23.
  • ASICS GT-2000 15's weight is 258 g, 28 g lighter than Saucony Omni ST 23's 286 g.
  • Toe rocker is about the same: 32 % of length for ASICS GT-2000 15, 32 % of length for Saucony Omni ST 23.

ASICS GT-2000 15 details · Saucony Omni ST 23 details · Add more shoes