ASICS Megablast vs New Balance Fresh Foam X 1080v15
Two popular shoes in the same category, compared on measured geometry. Each cell carries a provenance badge; open a shoe for sources.
- ASICS Megablast45/37 mm · toe rocker 32 % · heel bevel 12 %
- New Balance Fresh Foam X 1080v1538/32 mm · toe rocker 31 % · heel bevel 11 %
Which suits you
| If you want | Pick | Because |
|---|---|---|
| A smoother roll at toe-off | ASICS Megablast | 32.1 vs 31.5 % toe rocker; 42.4 vs 35.8 mm toe tip |
| More cushioning under the heel | ASICS Megablast | 45 vs 38 mm heel stack |
| More under the forefoot | ASICS Megablast | 37 vs 32 mm forefoot stack |
| A lower drop | New Balance Fresh Foam X 1080v15 | 8 vs 6 mm drop |
| A stiffer, snappier forefoot | ASICS Megablast | 57 vs 37 /100 stiffness |
| A firmer, more stable feel | ASICS Megablast | 39 vs 3 /100 firmness |
| A wider base under the forefoot | ASICS Megablast | 117.9 vs 108.9 mm forefoot base |
From the values below, with differences inside measurement noise shown as about the same. This describes the shoes, not what is right for your feet; comfort in the first few runs decides.
| Metric | ASICS Megablast Max cushion · Road | New Balance Fresh Foam X 1080v15 Max cushion · Road |
|---|---|---|
| Heel-to-toe drop | 8 mmStated | 6 mmDerived |
| Heel stack | 45 mmStated | 38 mmMeasured |
| Forefoot stack | 37 mmStated | 32 mmMeasured |
| Weight | 224 gStated | 261 gStated |
| Toe rocker | 32 %est. | 31 %est. |
| Rocker radius | 37 %est. | 48 %est. |
| Rocker rise angle | 33 degest. | 28 degest. |
| Rocker angle at toe | 66 degest. | 53 degest. |
| Toe tip over ground | 42 mmest. | 36 mm*est. |
| Visible rocker lift onset | 78.5 %est. | 76.6 %est. |
| Toe spring (relative) | 20.8 %est. | 16.8 %est. |
| Heel bevel length | 12.3 %est. | 10.9 %*est. |
| Heel bevel height | 25 mmest. | 18 mm*est. |
| Midsole width (forefoot) | 117.9 mmMeasured | 108.9 mmMeasured |
| Midsole width (heel) | 95.4 mmMeasured | 91.4 mmMeasured |
| Interior forefoot width | 93.7 mmMeasured | 94.8 mmMeasured |
| Toebox width | 74.3 mmMeasured | 73.2 mmMeasured |
| Longitudinal stiffness | 57Derived | 37Derived |
| Midsole firmness | 39Derived | 3Derived |
| Plate | No plate | No plate |
| Primary foam | FF Turbo Squared (full-length) | Infinion (supercritical TPEE/EVA blend) |
| List price | $225 | $170 |
Key differences
- ASICS Megablast's heel-to-toe drop is 8 mm, 2 mm higher than New Balance Fresh Foam X 1080v15's 6 mm.
- ASICS Megablast's heel stack is 45 mm, 7 mm thicker than New Balance Fresh Foam X 1080v15's 38 mm.
- ASICS Megablast's forefoot stack is 37 mm, 5 mm thicker than New Balance Fresh Foam X 1080v15's 32 mm.
- ASICS Megablast's weight is 224 g, 37 g lighter than New Balance Fresh Foam X 1080v15's 261 g.
- Toe rocker is about the same: 32 % of length for ASICS Megablast, 31 % of length for New Balance Fresh Foam X 1080v15.
Read more about both shoes
We measure the shape. For how they feel over many miles, and for lab tests of cushioning, grip and fit:
ASICS Megablast
- Believe in the Run · tester review
- RTINGS · lab test
- RunRepeat · lab test
New Balance Fresh Foam X 1080v15
- Believe in the Run · tester review
- RTINGS · lab test
- RunRepeat · lab test
Independent sites; we are not affiliated with them.
ASICS Megablast details · New Balance Fresh Foam X 1080v15 details · Add more shoes