Brooks Adrenaline GTS 25 vs New Balance Fresh Foam X 860 v15
Two popular shoes in the same category, compared on measured geometry. Each cell carries a provenance badge; open a shoe for sources.
- Brooks Adrenaline GTS 2537/27 mm · toe rocker 32 % · heel bevel 9 %
- New Balance Fresh Foam X 860 v1543/35 mm · toe rocker 32 % · heel bevel 10 %
Which suits you
| If you want | Pick | Because |
|---|---|---|
| A smoother roll at toe-off | About the same | 32 vs 31.7 % toe rocker |
| More cushioning under the heel | New Balance Fresh Foam X 860 v15 | 37 vs 43 mm heel stack |
| More under the forefoot | New Balance Fresh Foam X 860 v15 | 27 vs 35 mm forefoot stack |
| A lower drop | New Balance Fresh Foam X 860 v15 | 10 vs 8 mm drop |
| A stiffer, snappier forefoot | New Balance Fresh Foam X 860 v15 | 33 vs 67 /100 stiffness |
| A firmer, more stable feel | Brooks Adrenaline GTS 25 | 54 vs 20 /100 firmness |
| A wider base under the forefoot | About the same | 117.7 vs 117 mm forefoot base |
| Less weight | Brooks Adrenaline GTS 25 | 301 vs 335 g |
From the values below, with differences inside measurement noise shown as about the same. This describes the shoes, not what is right for your feet; comfort in the first few runs decides.
| Metric | Brooks Adrenaline GTS 25 Stability · Road | New Balance Fresh Foam X 860 v15 Stability · Road |
|---|---|---|
| Heel-to-toe drop | 10 mmStated | 8 mmStated |
| Heel stack | 37 mmStated | 43 mmStated |
| Forefoot stack | 27 mmStated | 35 mmStated |
| Weight | 301 gStated | 335 gStated |
| Toe rocker | 32 %est. | 32 %est. |
| Rocker radius | 36 %est. | 35 %est. |
| Rocker rise angle | 31 degest. | 33 degest. |
| Rocker angle at toe | 60 degest. | 62 degest. |
| Toe tip over ground | 39 mm*est. | 40 mm*est. |
| Visible rocker lift onset | 76.5 %est. | 78.3 %est. |
| Toe spring (relative) | 19.3 %est. | 20.5 %est. |
| Heel bevel length | 9 %*est. | 10.1 %est. |
| Heel bevel height | 14 mm*est. | 23 mm*est. |
| Midsole width (forefoot) | 117.7 mmMeasured | 117 mmMeasured |
| Midsole width (heel) | 100.7 mmMeasured | 93.4 mmMeasured |
| Toe box shape | 77 %*est. | — |
| Interior forefoot width | 96 mmMeasured | 93.6 mmMeasured |
| Toebox width | 72.8 mmMeasured | 75.1 mmMeasured |
| Longitudinal stiffness | 33Derived | 67Derived |
| Midsole firmness | 54Derived | 20Derived |
| Plate | No plate | Plate unknown |
| Primary foam | DNA Loft v3 | Fresh Foam X (dual-density) |
| List price | $145 | $150 |
Key differences
- Brooks Adrenaline GTS 25's heel-to-toe drop is 10 mm, 2 mm higher than New Balance Fresh Foam X 860 v15's 8 mm.
- Brooks Adrenaline GTS 25's heel stack is 37 mm, 6 mm thinner than New Balance Fresh Foam X 860 v15's 43 mm.
- Brooks Adrenaline GTS 25's forefoot stack is 27 mm, 8 mm thinner than New Balance Fresh Foam X 860 v15's 35 mm.
- Brooks Adrenaline GTS 25's weight is 301 g, 34 g lighter than New Balance Fresh Foam X 860 v15's 335 g.
- Toe rocker is about the same: 32 % of length for Brooks Adrenaline GTS 25, 32 % of length for New Balance Fresh Foam X 860 v15.
Read more about both shoes
We measure the shape. For how they feel over many miles, and for lab tests of cushioning, grip and fit:
Brooks Adrenaline GTS 25
- Believe in the Run · tester review
- RTINGS · lab test
- RunRepeat · lab test
Independent sites; we are not affiliated with them.
Brooks Adrenaline GTS 25 details · New Balance Fresh Foam X 860 v15 details · Add more shoes