Brooks Cascadia Elite vs La Sportiva Prodigio Pro
Two popular shoes in the same category, compared on measured geometry. Each cell carries a provenance badge; open a shoe for sources.
- Brooks Cascadia Elite40/34 mm · toe rocker 38 % · heel bevel 12 %
- La Sportiva Prodigio Pro34/28 mm · toe rocker 39 % · heel bevel 18 %
Which suits you
| If you want | Pick | Because |
|---|---|---|
| A smoother roll at toe-off | About the same | 38.1 vs 39.2 % toe rocker |
| More cushioning under the heel | Brooks Cascadia Elite | 40 vs 34 mm heel stack |
| More under the forefoot | Brooks Cascadia Elite | 34 vs 28 mm forefoot stack |
| A lower drop | About the same | 6 vs 6 mm drop |
| A stiffer, snappier forefoot | About the same | 39 vs 33 /100 stiffness |
| A firmer, more stable feel | La Sportiva Prodigio Pro | 23 vs 56 /100 firmness |
| A wider base under the forefoot | About the same | 116.9 vs 117.1 mm forefoot base |
From the values below, with differences inside measurement noise shown as about the same. This describes the shoes, not what is right for your feet; comfort in the first few runs decides.
| Metric | Brooks Cascadia Elite Trail · Trail | La Sportiva Prodigio Pro Trail · Trail |
|---|---|---|
| Heel-to-toe drop | 6 mmDerived | 6 mmStated |
| Heel stack | 40 mmStated | 34 mmStated |
| Forefoot stack | 34 mmStated | 28 mmStated |
| Weight | 266 gStated | 267 gStated |
| Toe rocker | 38 %est. | 39 %est. |
| Rocker radius | 47 %est. | 51 %est. |
| Rocker rise angle | 28 degest. | 28 degest. |
| Rocker angle at toe | 59 degest. | 59 degest. |
| Toe tip over ground | 46 mm*est. | 44 mmest. |
| Visible rocker lift onset | 73.9 %est. | 74.6 %est. |
| Toe spring (relative) | 20.8 %est. | 20.9 %est. |
| Heel bevel length | 12.4 %est. | 18.1 %est. |
| Heel bevel height | 19 mm*est. | 6 mm*est. |
| Midsole width (forefoot) | 116.9 mmMeasured | 117.1 mmMeasured |
| Midsole width (heel) | 100.9 mmMeasured | 86.1 mmMeasured |
| Toe box shape | 79 %est. | — |
| Interior forefoot width | 92.6 mmMeasured | 92 mmMeasured |
| Toebox width | 71.6 mmMeasured | 72.4 mmMeasured |
| Longitudinal stiffness | 39Derived | 33Derived |
| Midsole firmness | 23Derived | 56Derived |
| Plate | Carbon composite | Rock plate |
| Primary foam | DNA Gold (PEBA) | XFlow Speed (supercritical TPU core) |
| List price | $275 | $225 |
Key differences
- Heel-to-toe drop is about the same: 6 mm for Brooks Cascadia Elite, 6 mm for La Sportiva Prodigio Pro.
- Brooks Cascadia Elite's heel stack is 40 mm, 6 mm thicker than La Sportiva Prodigio Pro's 34 mm.
- Brooks Cascadia Elite's forefoot stack is 34 mm, 6 mm thicker than La Sportiva Prodigio Pro's 28 mm.
- Weight is about the same: 266 g for Brooks Cascadia Elite, 267 g for La Sportiva Prodigio Pro.
- Toe rocker is about the same: 38 % of length for Brooks Cascadia Elite, 39 % of length for La Sportiva Prodigio Pro.
Read more about both shoes
We measure the shape. For how they feel over many miles, and for lab tests of cushioning, grip and fit:
Brooks Cascadia Elite
- Believe in the Run · tester review
- RunRepeat · lab test
La Sportiva Prodigio Pro
- Believe in the Run · tester review
- RunRepeat · lab test
Independent sites; we are not affiliated with them.
Brooks Cascadia Elite details · La Sportiva Prodigio Pro details · Add more shoes