Brooks Ghost AMP vs Mizuno Neo Zen 2
Two shoes compared on measured geometry. Each cell carries a provenance badge; open a shoe for sources.
- Brooks Ghost AMP36/30 mm · toe rocker 33 % · heel bevel 9 %
- Mizuno Neo Zen 240/34 mm · toe rocker 29 % · heel bevel 15 %
Which suits you
| If you want | Pick | Because |
|---|---|---|
| A smoother roll at toe-off | Brooks Ghost AMP | 32.7 vs 28.6 % toe rocker |
| More cushioning under the heel | Mizuno Neo Zen 2 | 36 vs 40 mm heel stack |
| More under the forefoot | Mizuno Neo Zen 2 | 30 vs 34 mm forefoot stack |
| A lower drop | About the same | 6 vs 6 mm drop |
| A stiffer, snappier forefoot | Mizuno Neo Zen 2 | 15 vs 28 /100 stiffness |
| A firmer, more stable feel | About the same | 52 vs 45 /100 firmness |
| A wider base under the forefoot | Mizuno Neo Zen 2 | 112.2 vs 115.7 mm forefoot base |
From the values below, with differences inside measurement noise shown as about the same. This describes the shoes, not what is right for your feet; comfort in the first few runs decides.
| Metric | Brooks Ghost AMP Daily trainer · Road | Mizuno Neo Zen 2 Daily trainer · Road |
|---|---|---|
| Heel-to-toe drop | 6 mmStated | 6 mmStated |
| Heel stack | 36 mmStated | 40 mmStated |
| Forefoot stack | 30 mmStated | 34 mmStated |
| Weight | 255 gStated | 241 gStated |
| Toe rocker | 33 %est. | 29 %est. |
| Rocker radius | 40 %est. | 31 %est. |
| Rocker rise angle | 30 degest. | 34 degest. |
| Rocker angle at toe | 63 degest. | 59 degest. |
| Toe tip over ground | 39 mm*est. | 37 mm*est. |
| Visible rocker lift onset | 78.1 %est. | 81 %est. |
| Toe spring (relative) | 19.2 %est. | 19.3 %est. |
| Heel bevel length | 8.9 %est. | 14.9 %*est. |
| Heel bevel height | 19 mm*est. | 22 mm*est. |
| Midsole width (forefoot) | 112.2 mmMeasured | 115.7 mmMeasured |
| Midsole width (heel) | 94.2 mmMeasured | 94.2 mmMeasured |
| Toe box shape | 72 %est. | — |
| Interior forefoot width | 94.4 mmMeasured | 92.2 mmMeasured |
| Toebox width | 71 mmMeasured | 68.3 mmMeasured |
| Longitudinal stiffness | 15Derived | 28Derived |
| Midsole firmness | 52Derived | 45Derived |
| Plate | No plate | No plate |
| Primary foam | DNA Hype (PEBA/EVA blend) | Enerzy NXT |
| List price | $150 | $160 |
Key differences
- Heel-to-toe drop is about the same: 6 mm for Brooks Ghost AMP, 6 mm for Mizuno Neo Zen 2.
- Brooks Ghost AMP's heel stack is 36 mm, 4 mm thinner than Mizuno Neo Zen 2's 40 mm.
- Brooks Ghost AMP's forefoot stack is 30 mm, 4 mm thinner than Mizuno Neo Zen 2's 34 mm.
- Brooks Ghost AMP's weight is 255 g, 14 g heavier than Mizuno Neo Zen 2's 241 g.
- Brooks Ghost AMP's toe rocker is 33 % of length, 4 % of length longer than Mizuno Neo Zen 2's 29 % of length.
Read more about both shoes
We measure the shape. For how they feel over many miles, and for lab tests of cushioning, grip and fit:
Brooks Ghost AMP
- Believe in the Run · tester review
- RTINGS · lab test
- RunRepeat · lab test
Mizuno Neo Zen 2
- Believe in the Run · tester review
- RTINGS · lab test
- RunRepeat · lab test
Independent sites; we are not affiliated with them.
Brooks Ghost AMP details · Mizuno Neo Zen 2 details · Add more shoes