Hoka Bondi 9 vs New Balance Fresh Foam X 1080v15
Two popular shoes in the same category, compared on measured geometry. Each cell carries a provenance badge; open a shoe for sources.
- Hoka Bondi 943/38 mm · toe rocker 35 % · heel bevel 12 %
- New Balance Fresh Foam X 1080v1538/32 mm · toe rocker 31 % · heel bevel 11 %
Which suits you
| If you want | Pick | Because |
|---|---|---|
| A smoother roll at toe-off | Hoka Bondi 9 | 35 vs 31.5 % toe rocker |
| More cushioning under the heel | Hoka Bondi 9 | 43 vs 38 mm heel stack |
| More under the forefoot | Hoka Bondi 9 | 38 vs 32 mm forefoot stack |
| A lower drop | Hoka Bondi 9 | 5 vs 6 mm drop |
| A stiffer, snappier forefoot | About the same | 45 vs 37 /100 stiffness |
| A firmer, more stable feel | Hoka Bondi 9 | 87 vs 3 /100 firmness |
| A wider base under the forefoot | Hoka Bondi 9 | 123.2 vs 108.9 mm forefoot base |
From the values below, with differences inside measurement noise shown as about the same. This describes the shoes, not what is right for your feet; comfort in the first few runs decides.
| Metric | Hoka Bondi 9 Max cushion · Road | New Balance Fresh Foam X 1080v15 Max cushion · Road |
|---|---|---|
| Heel-to-toe drop | 5 mmStated | 6 mmDerived |
| Heel stack | 43 mmStated | 38 mmMeasured |
| Forefoot stack | 38 mmStated | 32 mmMeasured |
| Weight | 298 gStated | 261 gStated |
| Toe rocker | 35 %est. | 31 %est. |
| Rocker radius | 41 %est. | 48 %est. |
| Rocker rise angle | 27 degest. | 28 degest. |
| Rocker angle at toe | 58 degest. | 53 degest. |
| Toe tip over ground | 39 mm*est. | 36 mm*est. |
| Visible rocker lift onset | 78.5 %est. | 76.6 %est. |
| Toe spring (relative) | 18.3 %est. | 16.8 %est. |
| Heel bevel length | 11.5 %*est. | 10.9 %*est. |
| Heel bevel height | 20 mmest. | 18 mm*est. |
| Midsole width (forefoot) | 123.2 mmMeasured | 108.9 mmMeasured |
| Midsole width (heel) | 104.2 mmMeasured | 91.4 mmMeasured |
| Toe box shape | 75 %*est. | — |
| Interior forefoot width | 94.1 mmMeasured | 94.8 mmMeasured |
| Toebox width | 72.5 mmMeasured | 73.2 mmMeasured |
| Longitudinal stiffness | 45Derived | 37Derived |
| Midsole firmness | 87Derived | 3Derived |
| Plate | No plate | No plate |
| Primary foam | Supercritical EVA | Infinion (supercritical TPEE/EVA blend) |
| List price | $170 | $170 |
Key differences
- Hoka Bondi 9's heel-to-toe drop is 5 mm, 1 mm lower than New Balance Fresh Foam X 1080v15's 6 mm.
- Hoka Bondi 9's heel stack is 43 mm, 5 mm thicker than New Balance Fresh Foam X 1080v15's 38 mm.
- Hoka Bondi 9's forefoot stack is 38 mm, 6 mm thicker than New Balance Fresh Foam X 1080v15's 32 mm.
- Hoka Bondi 9's weight is 298 g, 37 g heavier than New Balance Fresh Foam X 1080v15's 261 g.
- Hoka Bondi 9's toe rocker is 35 % of length, 4 % of length longer than New Balance Fresh Foam X 1080v15's 31 % of length.
Read more about both shoes
We measure the shape. For how they feel over many miles, and for lab tests of cushioning, grip and fit:
Hoka Bondi 9
- Believe in the Run · tester review
- RTINGS · lab test
- RunRepeat · lab test
New Balance Fresh Foam X 1080v15
- Believe in the Run · tester review
- RTINGS · lab test
- RunRepeat · lab test
Independent sites; we are not affiliated with them.
Hoka Bondi 9 details · New Balance Fresh Foam X 1080v15 details · Add more shoes