Mizuno Neo Zen 2 vs Saucony Ride 19
Two popular shoes in the same category, compared on measured geometry. Each cell carries a provenance badge; open a shoe for sources.
- Mizuno Neo Zen 240/34 mm · toe rocker 29 % · heel bevel 15 %
- Saucony Ride 1938/30 mm · toe rocker 34 % · heel bevel 10 %
Which suits you
| If you want | Pick | Because |
|---|---|---|
| A smoother roll at toe-off | Saucony Ride 19 | 28.6 vs 33.7 % toe rocker |
| More cushioning under the heel | Mizuno Neo Zen 2 | 40 vs 38 mm heel stack |
| More under the forefoot | Mizuno Neo Zen 2 | 34 vs 30 mm forefoot stack |
| A lower drop | Mizuno Neo Zen 2 | 6 vs 8 mm drop |
| A stiffer, snappier forefoot | Saucony Ride 19 | 28 vs 58 /100 stiffness |
| A firmer, more stable feel | Saucony Ride 19 | 45 vs 64 /100 firmness |
| A wider base under the forefoot | Saucony Ride 19 | 115.7 vs 127.1 mm forefoot base |
From the values below, with differences inside measurement noise shown as about the same. This describes the shoes, not what is right for your feet; comfort in the first few runs decides.
| Metric | Mizuno Neo Zen 2 Daily trainer · Road | Saucony Ride 19 Daily trainer · Road |
|---|---|---|
| Heel-to-toe drop | 6 mmStated | 8 mmStated |
| Heel stack | 40 mmStated | 38 mmStated |
| Forefoot stack | 34 mmStated | 30 mmStated |
| Weight | 241 gStated | 252 gStated |
| Toe rocker | 29 %est. | 34 %est. |
| Rocker radius | 31 %est. | 44 %est. |
| Rocker rise angle | 34 degest. | 28 degest. |
| Rocker angle at toe | 59 degest. | 62 degest. |
| Toe tip over ground | 37 mm*est. | 35 mm*est. |
| Visible rocker lift onset | 81 %est. | 76.9 %est. |
| Toe spring (relative) | 19.3 %est. | 17.5 %est. |
| Heel bevel length | 14.9 %*est. | 10.2 %*est. |
| Heel bevel height | 22 mm*est. | 26 mm*est. |
| Midsole width (forefoot) | 115.7 mmMeasured | 127.1 mmMeasured |
| Midsole width (heel) | 94.2 mmMeasured | 100.7 mmMeasured |
| Toe box shape | — | 74 %*est. |
| Interior forefoot width | 92.2 mmMeasured | 96.3 mmMeasured |
| Toebox width | 68.3 mmMeasured | 72.8 mmMeasured |
| Longitudinal stiffness | 28Derived | 58Derived |
| Midsole firmness | 45Derived | 64Derived |
| Plate | No plate | No plate |
| Primary foam | Enerzy NXT | PWRRUN+ |
| List price | $160 | $145 |
Key differences
- Mizuno Neo Zen 2's heel-to-toe drop is 6 mm, 2 mm lower than Saucony Ride 19's 8 mm.
- Mizuno Neo Zen 2's heel stack is 40 mm, 2 mm thicker than Saucony Ride 19's 38 mm.
- Mizuno Neo Zen 2's forefoot stack is 34 mm, 4 mm thicker than Saucony Ride 19's 30 mm.
- Mizuno Neo Zen 2's weight is 241 g, 11 g lighter than Saucony Ride 19's 252 g.
- Mizuno Neo Zen 2's toe rocker is 29 % of length, 5 % of length shorter than Saucony Ride 19's 34 % of length.
Read more about both shoes
We measure the shape. For how they feel over many miles, and for lab tests of cushioning, grip and fit:
Mizuno Neo Zen 2
- Believe in the Run · tester review
- RTINGS · lab test
- RunRepeat · lab test
Saucony Ride 19
- Believe in the Run · tester review
- RTINGS · lab test
- RunRepeat · lab test
Independent sites; we are not affiliated with them.
Mizuno Neo Zen 2 details · Saucony Ride 19 details · Add more shoes