Nike Pegasus 42 vs Saucony Endorphin Azura
Two popular shoes in the same category, compared on measured geometry. Each cell carries a provenance badge; open a shoe for sources.
- Nike Pegasus 4237/27 mm · toe rocker 34 % · heel bevel 10 %
- Saucony Endorphin Azura40/32 mm · toe rocker 34 % · heel bevel 12 %
Which suits you
| If you want | Pick | Because |
|---|---|---|
| A smoother roll at toe-off | Saucony Endorphin Azura | 33.9 vs 33.7 % toe rocker; 33 vs 45.4 mm toe tip |
| More cushioning under the heel | Saucony Endorphin Azura | 37 vs 40 mm heel stack |
| More under the forefoot | Saucony Endorphin Azura | 27 vs 32 mm forefoot stack |
| A lower drop | Saucony Endorphin Azura | 10 vs 8 mm drop |
| A stiffer, snappier forefoot | Saucony Endorphin Azura | 35 vs 45 /100 stiffness |
| A firmer, more stable feel | Saucony Endorphin Azura | 66 vs 76 /100 firmness |
| A wider base under the forefoot | Saucony Endorphin Azura | 112.3 vs 123.4 mm forefoot base |
From the values below, with differences inside measurement noise shown as about the same. This describes the shoes, not what is right for your feet; comfort in the first few runs decides.
| Metric | Nike Pegasus 42 Daily trainer · Road | Saucony Endorphin Azura Daily trainer · Road |
|---|---|---|
| Heel-to-toe drop | 10 mmStated | 8 mmStated |
| Heel stack | 37 mmStated | 40 mmStated |
| Forefoot stack | 27 mmStated | 32 mmStated |
| Weight | 300 gStated | 241 gStated |
| Toe rocker | 34 %est. | 34 %est. |
| Rocker radius | 47 %est. | 36 %est. |
| Rocker rise angle | 24 degest. | 32 degest. |
| Rocker angle at toe | 53 degest. | 64 degest. |
| Toe tip over ground | 33 mm*est. | 45 mm*est. |
| Visible rocker lift onset | 79 %est. | 77.3 %est. |
| Toe spring (relative) | 15.3 %est. | 21.1 %est. |
| Heel bevel length | 10 %*est. | 11.8 %*est. |
| Heel bevel height | 20 mm*est. | 29 mm*est. |
| Midsole width (forefoot) | 112.3 mmMeasured | 123.4 mmMeasured |
| Midsole width (heel) | 88.1 mmMeasured | 91.6 mmMeasured |
| Toe box shape | 73 %*est. | — |
| Interior forefoot width | 96.5 mmMeasured | 94 mmMeasured |
| Toebox width | 72.3 mmMeasured | 72.2 mmMeasured |
| Longitudinal stiffness | 35Derived | 45Derived |
| Midsole firmness | 66Derived | 76Derived |
| Plate | No plate | No plate |
| Primary foam | ReactX + ZoomX, full-length Air Zoom unit | PWRRUN PB |
| List price | $145 | $150 |
Key differences
- Nike Pegasus 42's heel-to-toe drop is 10 mm, 2 mm higher than Saucony Endorphin Azura's 8 mm.
- Nike Pegasus 42's heel stack is 37 mm, 3 mm thinner than Saucony Endorphin Azura's 40 mm.
- Nike Pegasus 42's forefoot stack is 27 mm, 5 mm thinner than Saucony Endorphin Azura's 32 mm.
- Nike Pegasus 42's weight is 300 g, 59 g heavier than Saucony Endorphin Azura's 241 g.
- Toe rocker is about the same: 34 % of length for Nike Pegasus 42, 34 % of length for Saucony Endorphin Azura.
Read more about both shoes
We measure the shape. For how they feel over many miles, and for lab tests of cushioning, grip and fit:
Nike Pegasus 42
- Believe in the Run · tester review
- RTINGS · lab test
- RunRepeat · lab test
Saucony Endorphin Azura
- Believe in the Run · tester review
- RTINGS · lab test
- RunRepeat · lab test
Independent sites; we are not affiliated with them.
Nike Pegasus 42 details · Saucony Endorphin Azura details · Add more shoes