Adidas Adizero Evo SL vs Brooks Hyperion Max 4
Two popular shoes in the same category, compared on measured geometry. Each cell carries a provenance badge; open a shoe for sources.
- Adidas Adizero Evo SL37/31 mm · toe rocker 41 % · heel bevel 7 %
- Brooks Hyperion Max 445/39 mm · toe rocker 36 % · heel bevel 13 %
Which suits you
| If you want | Pick | Because |
|---|---|---|
| A smoother roll at toe-off | Adidas Adizero Evo SL | 40.6 vs 35.7 % toe rocker |
| More cushioning under the heel | Brooks Hyperion Max 4 | 37 vs 45 mm heel stack |
| More under the forefoot | Brooks Hyperion Max 4 | 30.5 vs 39 mm forefoot stack |
| A lower drop | About the same | 6.5 vs 6 mm drop |
| A stiffer, snappier forefoot | Brooks Hyperion Max 4 | 9 vs 58 /100 stiffness |
| A firmer, more stable feel | Adidas Adizero Evo SL | 89 vs 15 /100 firmness |
| A wider base under the forefoot | About the same | 116.3 vs 119 mm forefoot base |
| Less weight | Adidas Adizero Evo SL | 230 vs 286 g |
From the values below, with differences inside measurement noise shown as about the same. This describes the shoes, not what is right for your feet; comfort in the first few runs decides.
| Metric | Adidas Adizero Evo SL Tempo · Road | Brooks Hyperion Max 4 Tempo · Road |
|---|---|---|
| Heel-to-toe drop | 6.5 mmStated | 6 mmStated |
| Heel stack | 37 mmStated | 45 mmStated |
| Forefoot stack | 30.5 mmStated | 39 mmStated |
| Weight | 230 gStated | 286 gStated |
| Toe rocker | 41 %est. | 36 %est. |
| Rocker radius | 44 %est. | 43 %est. |
| Rocker rise angle | 27 degest. | 30 degest. |
| Rocker angle at toe | 56 degest. | 57 degest. |
| Toe tip over ground | 46 mm*est. | 48 mm*est. |
| Visible rocker lift onset | 66.8 %est. | 75.4 %est. |
| Toe spring (relative) | 20.3 %est. | 20.5 %est. |
| Heel bevel length | 6.7 %*est. | 13.2 %est. |
| Heel bevel height | 19 mm*est. | 23 mm*est. |
| Midsole width (forefoot) | 116.3 mmMeasured | 119 mmMeasured |
| Midsole width (heel) | 87.3 mmMeasured | 86.8 mmMeasured |
| Interior forefoot width | 97.5 mmMeasured | 92.7 mmMeasured |
| Toebox width | 71.6 mmMeasured | 71.7 mmMeasured |
| Longitudinal stiffness | 9Derived | 58Derived |
| Midsole firmness | 89Derived | 15Derived |
| Plate | No plate | Nylon plate |
| Primary foam | Lightstrike Pro | DNA Gold (PEBA) |
| List price | $150 | $200 |
Key differences
- Heel-to-toe drop is about the same: 6.5 mm for Adidas Adizero Evo SL, 6 mm for Brooks Hyperion Max 4.
- Adidas Adizero Evo SL's heel stack is 37 mm, 8 mm thinner than Brooks Hyperion Max 4's 45 mm.
- Adidas Adizero Evo SL's forefoot stack is 30.5 mm, 8.5 mm thinner than Brooks Hyperion Max 4's 39 mm.
- Adidas Adizero Evo SL's weight is 230 g, 56 g lighter than Brooks Hyperion Max 4's 286 g.
- Adidas Adizero Evo SL's toe rocker is 41 % of length, 5 % of length longer than Brooks Hyperion Max 4's 36 % of length.
Read more about both shoes
We measure the shape. For how they feel over many miles, and for lab tests of cushioning, grip and fit:
Adidas Adizero Evo SL
- Believe in the Run · tester review
- RTINGS · lab test
- RunRepeat · lab test
Brooks Hyperion Max 4
- Believe in the Run · tester review
- RTINGS · lab test
- RunRepeat · lab test
Independent sites; we are not affiliated with them.
Adidas Adizero Evo SL details · Brooks Hyperion Max 4 details · Add more shoes