ASICS Gel-Cumulus 28 vs Nike Pegasus 42
Two shoes compared on measured geometry. Each cell carries a provenance badge; open a shoe for sources.
- ASICS Gel-Cumulus 2838/30 mm · toe rocker 33 % · heel bevel 11 %
- Nike Pegasus 4237/27 mm · toe rocker 34 % · heel bevel 10 %
Which suits you
| If you want | Pick | Because |
|---|---|---|
| A smoother roll at toe-off | About the same | 33 vs 33.9 % toe rocker |
| More cushioning under the heel | About the same | 37.5 vs 37 mm heel stack |
| More under the forefoot | ASICS Gel-Cumulus 28 | 29.5 vs 27 mm forefoot stack |
| A lower drop | ASICS Gel-Cumulus 28 | 8 vs 10 mm drop |
| A stiffer, snappier forefoot | About the same | 30 vs 35 /100 stiffness |
| A firmer, more stable feel | Nike Pegasus 42 | 44 vs 66 /100 firmness |
| A wider base under the forefoot | ASICS Gel-Cumulus 28 | 120.5 vs 112.3 mm forefoot base |
From the values below, with differences inside measurement noise shown as about the same. This describes the shoes, not what is right for your feet; comfort in the first few runs decides.
| Metric | ASICS Gel-Cumulus 28 Daily trainer · Road | Nike Pegasus 42 Daily trainer · Road |
|---|---|---|
| Heel-to-toe drop | 8 mmStated | 10 mmStated |
| Heel stack | 37.5 mmStated | 37 mmStated |
| Forefoot stack | 29.5 mmStated | 27 mmStated |
| Weight | 259 gStated | 300 gStated |
| Toe rocker | 33 %est. | 34 %est. |
| Rocker radius | 42 %est. | 47 %est. |
| Rocker rise angle | 28 degest. | 24 degest. |
| Rocker angle at toe | 57 degest. | 53 degest. |
| Toe tip over ground | 37 mmest. | 33 mm*est. |
| Visible rocker lift onset | 77.9 %est. | 79 %est. |
| Toe spring (relative) | 18.1 %est. | 15.3 %est. |
| Heel bevel length | 11 %est. | 10 %*est. |
| Heel bevel height | 23 mm*est. | 20 mm*est. |
| Midsole width (forefoot) | 120.5 mmMeasured | 112.3 mmMeasured |
| Midsole width (heel) | 96.5 mmMeasured | 88.1 mmMeasured |
| Toe box shape | 71 %est. | 73 %*est. |
| Interior forefoot width | 94.5 mmMeasured | 96.5 mmMeasured |
| Toebox width | 74.4 mmMeasured | 72.3 mmMeasured |
| Longitudinal stiffness | 30Derived | 35Derived |
| Midsole firmness | 44Derived | 66Derived |
| Plate | No plate | No plate |
| Primary foam | FF Blast Max + PureGEL heel | ReactX + ZoomX, full-length Air Zoom unit |
| List price | $145 | $145 |
Key differences
- ASICS Gel-Cumulus 28's heel-to-toe drop is 8 mm, 2 mm lower than Nike Pegasus 42's 10 mm.
- Heel stack is about the same: 37.5 mm for ASICS Gel-Cumulus 28, 37 mm for Nike Pegasus 42.
- ASICS Gel-Cumulus 28's forefoot stack is 29.5 mm, 2.5 mm thicker than Nike Pegasus 42's 27 mm.
- ASICS Gel-Cumulus 28's weight is 259 g, 41 g lighter than Nike Pegasus 42's 300 g.
- Toe rocker is about the same: 33 % of length for ASICS Gel-Cumulus 28, 34 % of length for Nike Pegasus 42.
Read more about both shoes
We measure the shape. For how they feel over many miles, and for lab tests of cushioning, grip and fit:
Nike Pegasus 42
- Believe in the Run · tester review
- RTINGS · lab test
- RunRepeat · lab test
Independent sites; we are not affiliated with them.
ASICS Gel-Cumulus 28 details · Nike Pegasus 42 details · Add more shoes