ASICS Novablast 6 vs Saucony Endorphin Azura
Two shoes compared on measured geometry. Each cell carries a provenance badge; open a shoe for sources.
- ASICS Novablast 642/34 mm · toe rocker 34 % · heel bevel 7 %
- Saucony Endorphin Azura40/32 mm · toe rocker 34 % · heel bevel 12 %
Which suits you
| If you want | Pick | Because |
|---|---|---|
| A smoother roll at toe-off | About the same | 34.2 vs 33.7 % toe rocker |
| More cushioning under the heel | About the same | 41.5 vs 40 mm heel stack |
| More under the forefoot | About the same | 33.5 vs 32 mm forefoot stack |
| A lower drop | About the same | 8 vs 8 mm drop |
| A stiffer, snappier forefoot | About the same | 39 vs 45 /100 stiffness |
| A firmer, more stable feel | Saucony Endorphin Azura | 56 vs 76 /100 firmness |
| A wider base under the forefoot | Saucony Endorphin Azura | 115.2 vs 123.4 mm forefoot base |
| Less weight | Saucony Endorphin Azura | 249 vs 241 g |
From the values below, with differences inside measurement noise shown as about the same. This describes the shoes, not what is right for your feet; comfort in the first few runs decides.
| Metric | ASICS Novablast 6 Daily trainer · Road | Saucony Endorphin Azura Daily trainer · Road |
|---|---|---|
| Heel-to-toe drop | 8 mmStated | 8 mmStated |
| Heel stack | 41.5 mmStated | 40 mmStated |
| Forefoot stack | 33.5 mmStated | 32 mmStated |
| Weight | 249 gStated | 241 gStated |
| Toe rocker | 34 %est. | 34 %est. |
| Rocker radius | 42 %est. | 36 %est. |
| Rocker rise angle | 29 degest. | 32 degest. |
| Rocker angle at toe | 56 degest. | 64 degest. |
| Toe tip over ground | 42 mm*est. | 45 mm*est. |
| Visible rocker lift onset | 74.1 %est. | 77.3 %est. |
| Toe spring (relative) | 18.9 %est. | 21.1 %est. |
| Heel bevel length | 7.5 %*est. | 11.8 %*est. |
| Heel bevel height | 20 mm*est. | 29 mm*est. |
| Midsole width (forefoot) | 115.2 mmMeasured | 123.4 mmMeasured |
| Midsole width (heel) | 93.8 mmMeasured | 91.6 mmMeasured |
| Interior forefoot width | 94.8 mmMeasured | 94 mmMeasured |
| Toebox width | 71 mmMeasured | 72.2 mmMeasured |
| Longitudinal stiffness | 39Derived | 45Derived |
| Midsole firmness | 56Derived | 76Derived |
| Plate | No plate | No plate |
| Primary foam | FF Blast Max (FF Turbo Squared forefoot trampoline pod) | PWRRUN PB |
| List price | $155 | $150 |
Key differences
- Heel-to-toe drop is about the same: 8 mm for ASICS Novablast 6, 8 mm for Saucony Endorphin Azura.
- ASICS Novablast 6's heel stack is 41.5 mm, 1.5 mm thicker than Saucony Endorphin Azura's 40 mm.
- ASICS Novablast 6's forefoot stack is 33.5 mm, 1.5 mm thicker than Saucony Endorphin Azura's 32 mm.
- ASICS Novablast 6's weight is 249 g, 8 g heavier than Saucony Endorphin Azura's 241 g.
- Toe rocker is about the same: 34 % of length for ASICS Novablast 6, 34 % of length for Saucony Endorphin Azura.
Read more about both shoes
We measure the shape. For how they feel over many miles, and for lab tests of cushioning, grip and fit:
ASICS Novablast 6
- Believe in the Run · tester review
- RTINGS · lab test
- RunRepeat · lab test
Saucony Endorphin Azura
- Believe in the Run · tester review
- RTINGS · lab test
- RunRepeat · lab test
Independent sites; we are not affiliated with them.
ASICS Novablast 6 details · Saucony Endorphin Azura details · Add more shoes