ASICS Novablast 6
At a glance
- Heel-to-toe drop
- 8 mmStated
- Stack, heel / forefoot
- 41.5 / 33.5 mmStated
- Weight
- 249 gStatedsize 9
- Plate
- No plate
- Toe rocker
- 34 % of lengthest.photos 34–35 %
- Heel bevel
- 7.5 % of lengthest.photos 7–11 %
- Stiffness / firmness
- 39 / 56 of 100Derived
- Primary foam
- FF Blast Max (FF Turbo Squared forefoot trampoline pod)
How it compares
- ASICS Novablast 6's heel-to-toe drop is 8 mm, higher than the catalogue median of 6 mm (59% of the 179 other current shoes are lower).
- ASICS Novablast 6's heel stack is 41.5 mm, thicker than the catalogue median of 38 mm (80% of the 176 other current shoes are thinner).
- ASICS Novablast 6's forefoot stack is 33.5 mm, thicker than the catalogue median of 31.5 mm (68% of the 171 other current shoes are thinner).
- ASICS Novablast 6's weight is 249 g, lighter than the catalogue median of 269 g (28% of the 167 other current shoes are lighter).
- Against the ASICS Novablast 5: forefoot base width narrower, stiffness stiffer, firmness firmer (details).
- 4 shoes with similar geometry from other lines.
Differences smaller than the precision of the sources (about 1 mm of stack, 8 g, or the spread between photos for photo estimates) are reported as about the same.
Specifications
- Heel-to-toe drop Manufacturer stated
- 8mm
- Heel stack Manufacturer stated
- 41.5mm
- Forefoot stack Manufacturer stated
- 33.5mm
- Weight Manufacturer stated
- 249g
- Plate
- No plate
- Primary foam
- FF Blast Max (FF Turbo Squared forefoot trampoline pod)
- List price
- $155
Geometry
Percent values are relative to shoe length so they compare across images and sizes; widths in millimetres are lab measurements from the cited source, while toe tip and heel heights in millimetres are photo estimates converted for a men’s US 9 (assumed 300 mm long), so approximate. See how rocker geometry is defined.
- Toe rocker AI estimated
- 34%
4 photos range 34–35 %; shown is one of the two that agree most closely.
- Rocker radius AI estimated
- 42%
4 photos range 41–42 %; shown is one of the two that agree most closely.
- Rocker rise angle AI estimated
- 29deg
4 photos range 28–29 deg; shown is one of the two that agree most closely.
- Toe tip over ground AI estimated
- 42mm*
4 photos range 39–45 mm; shown is the average of the two that agree most closely (* the photos disagree by more than usual).
- Rocker angle at toe AI estimated
- 56deg
4 photos range 53–58 deg; shown is one of the two that agree most closely.
- Visible rocker lift onset AI estimated
- 74.1%
4 photos range 73.4–76.4 %; shown is one of the two that agree most closely.
- Toe spring (relative) AI estimated
- 18.9%
4 photos range 18.1–19.6 %; shown is one of the two that agree most closely.
- Heel bevel length AI estimated
- 7.5%*
4 photos range 7.4–11 %; shown is the average of the two that agree most closely (* the photos disagree by more than usual).
- Heel bevel height AI estimated
- 24mm*
4 photos range 24–31 mm; shown is the average of the two that agree most closely (* the photos disagree by more than usual).
- Midsole width (forefoot) Externally measured
- 115.2mm
- Midsole width (heel) Externally measured
- 93.8mm
- Interior forefoot width Externally measured
- 94.8mm
- Toebox width Externally measured
- 71mm
Stiffness
- Longitudinal stiffness Derived
- 39/ 100
Lab reading: 15.5 N, force to bend the shoe 30° (lab bending test); the score is our 0–100 rescaling of it.
- Midsole firmness Derived
- 56/ 100
Lab reading: 35.1 Asker C, midsole durometer reading (higher = firmer); the score is our 0–100 rescaling of it.
How it compares
Compare:ASICS Novablast 6 vs ASICS Novablast 5ASICS Novablast 6 vs Mizuno Wave Rider 30ASICS Novablast 6 vs Hoka Clifton 11Previous version: ASICS Novablast 5
What changed from the ASICS Novablast 5
Forefoot base width narrower, stiffness stiffer, firmness firmer. Compared with the previous version in this catalogue; differences within measurement noise are shown as about the same.
- ASICS Novablast 642/34 mm · toe rocker 34 % · heel bevel 7 %
- ASICS Novablast 542/34 mm · toe rocker 33 % · heel bevel 10 %
| Measure | ASICS Novablast 5 | ASICS Novablast 6 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Heel stack | 41.5 mm | 41.5 mm | about the same |
| Forefoot stack | 33.5 mm | 33.5 mm | about the same |
| Drop | 8 mm | 8 mm | about the same |
| Weight | 255 g | 249 g | about the same |
| Toe rocker | 33.1% of length | 33.5% of length | about the same |
| Toe tip over ground | 41.9 mm | 42.3 mm | about the same |
| Rocker rise angle | 31.9° | 29° | flatter (−2.9) |
| Stiffness | 17/100 | 39/100 | stiffer (+22) |
| Firmness | 37/100 | 56/100 | firmer (+19) |
| Forefoot base width | 122.3 mm | 115.2 mm | narrower (−7.1 mm) |
| Foam | FF Blast Max | FF Blast Max (FF Turbo Squared forefoot trampoline pod) | naming difference: same foam, described differently by the sources |
Wrong value? Missing data? Tell me
Sources
- ASICS Novablast 6 Review (2026) - Doctors of RunningreviewDoctors of Runningaccessed 2026-10-04open ↗
- ASICS Novablast 6 Men's Shoes Black/Khaki | Running WarehouseretailerRunning Warehouseaccessed 2026-10-04open ↗
- asics-novablast-6 lateral product photoimageRunning Warehouseaccessed 2026-10-04open ↗
- asics-novablast-6 lateral product photoimageRunning Warehouseaccessed 2026-10-04open ↗
- asics-novablast-6 medial product photoimageRunning Warehouseaccessed 2026-10-04open ↗
- asics-novablast-6 medial product photoimageRunning Warehouseaccessed 2026-10-04open ↗
- Cut in half: ASICS Novablast 6 Review (2026) | RunRepeatlabRunRepeataccessed 2026-10-04open ↗
Technical detail: every recorded value, method and version (31)
All approved observations
Every recorded value, including superseded ones. The displayed value per metric is chosen by precedence (measured › stated › derived › AI estimated), then confidence, then recency. 60 further observations awaiting review.
| Metric | Value | Class | Confidence | Method | Source | Recorded |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Heel-to-toe drop | 8 mm | Stated | Medium | Spec listing | Doctors of Running | 2026-10-04 |
| Heel stack | 41.5 mm | Stated | Medium | Spec listing | Doctors of Running | 2026-10-04 |
| Heel stack | 42 mm | Stated | Medium | Spec listing | Running Warehouse | 2026-10-04 |
| Forefoot stack | 33.5 mm | Stated | Medium | Spec listing | Doctors of Running | 2026-10-04 |
| Forefoot stack | 34 mm | Stated | Medium | Spec listing | Running Warehouse | 2026-10-04 |
| Weight | 249 g | Stated | Medium | Spec listing | Running Warehouse | 2026-10-04 |
| Weight | 249 g (size 9) | Stated | Medium | Spec listing | Doctors of Running | 2026-10-04 |
| Rocker apex | 66.5 % | est. | Medium | Side photo | Running Warehouse | 2026-10-04 |
| Rocker apex | 66.1 % | est. | Low | Side photo | Running Warehouse | 2026-10-04 |
| Rocker radius | 42 % | est. | Medium | Side photo | Running Warehouse | 2026-10-04 |
| Rocker radius | 42 % | est. | Medium | Side photo | Running Warehouse | 2026-10-04 |
| Rocker rise angle | 29 deg | est. | Medium | Side photo | Running Warehouse | 2026-10-04 |
| Rocker rise angle | 29 deg | est. | Low | Side photo | Running Warehouse | 2026-10-04 |
| Rocker angle at toe | 56 deg | est. | Low | Side photo | Running Warehouse | 2026-10-04 |
| Rocker angle at toe | 56 deg | est. | Medium | Side photo | Running Warehouse | 2026-10-04 |
| Toe tip over ground | 43 mm | est. | Low | Side photo | Running Warehouse | 2026-10-04 |
| Toe tip over ground | 42 mm | est. | Medium | Side photo | Running Warehouse | 2026-10-04 |
| Visible rocker lift onset | 74.1 % | est. | Medium | Side photo | Running Warehouse | 2026-10-04 |
| Visible rocker lift onset | 73.7 % | est. | Low | Side photo | Running Warehouse | 2026-10-04 |
| Toe spring (relative) | 18.9 % | est. | Medium | Side photo | Running Warehouse | 2026-10-04 |
| Toe spring (relative) | 18.8 % | est. | Low | Side photo | Running Warehouse | 2026-10-04 |
| Heel bevel length | 7.4 % | est. | Medium | Side photo | Running Warehouse | 2026-10-04 |
| Heel bevel length | 7.5 % | est. | Medium | Side photo | Running Warehouse | 2026-10-04 |
| Heel bevel height | 24 mm | est. | Medium | Side photo | Running Warehouse | 2026-10-04 |
| Heel bevel height | 25 mm | est. | Medium | Side photo | Running Warehouse | 2026-10-04 |
| Midsole width (forefoot) | 115.2 mm | Measured | Medium | Lab test | RunRepeat | 2026-10-04 |
| Midsole width (heel) | 93.8 mm | Measured | Medium | Lab test | RunRepeat | 2026-10-04 |
| Interior forefoot width | 94.8 mm | Measured | Medium | Lab test | RunRepeat | 2026-10-04 |
| Toebox width | 71 mm | Measured | Medium | Lab test | RunRepeat | 2026-10-04 |
| Longitudinal stiffness | 39 | Derived | Medium | Lab flex test | RunRepeat | 2026-10-04 |
| Midsole firmness | 56 | Derived | Medium | Lab durometer | RunRepeat | 2026-10-04 |
Classes: Manufacturer stated · Externally measured · AI estimated · Derived · User reported. Hover a method for its identifier and algorithm version.
Source notes
- Running Warehouse: sha256=3d752138e4bd3a1ec9c7024ce3695ffbe8e8312b563f6ccff5b4b490ce15e2aa; 0.3
- Running Warehouse: sha256=10d6579965782346f970ed01ccf9c9bd54e8a86076541fe3c1f27640257d9272; 0.3
- Running Warehouse: sha256=3975d3ccb17e97e662f18dc32f2a3d3b09f82d517e09277583afb0402a5309bc; 0.3
- Running Warehouse: sha256=7cf62ab40cf1f90a0e0734f44b233fb4df733d9495f172dd477cc52644892519; 0.3
Shoes with similar geometry
Compare these →Closest current models from other lines by stack, drop, rocker, toe height, stiffness, firmness, weight and width, whichever both shoes have.
- Drop
- 8 mm
- Heel
- 38 mm
- Toe rocker
- —
vs this shoe: 4 mm lower heel
- Drop
- 8 mm
- Heel
- 38 mm
- Toe rocker
- 32%
vs this shoe: 4 mm lower heel
- Drop
- 8 mm
- Heel
- 41 mm
- Toe rocker
- 34%
vs this shoe: 26 g heavier
- Drop
- 8 mm
- Heel
- 46 mm
- Toe rocker
- 35%
vs this shoe: 5 mm higher heel