Hoka Clifton 11
At a glance
- Heel-to-toe drop
- 8 mmStated
- Stack, heel / forefoot
- 43 / 35 mmStated
- Weight
- 261 gStatedsize 9
- Plate
- No plate
- Toe rocker
- 38 % of lengthest.photos 35–38 %
- Heel bevel
- 11.7 % of lengthest.rough estimate; photos 12–14 %
- Stiffness / firmness
- 29 / 41 of 100Derived
- Primary foam
- CMEVA (compression-molded EVA)
How it compares
- Hoka Clifton 11's heel-to-toe drop is 8 mm, higher than the catalogue median of 6 mm (59% of the 179 other current shoes are lower).
- Hoka Clifton 11's heel stack is 43 mm, thicker than the catalogue median of 38 mm (84% of the 176 other current shoes are thinner).
- Hoka Clifton 11's forefoot stack is 35 mm, thicker than the catalogue median of 31.5 mm (76% of the 171 other current shoes are thinner).
- Hoka Clifton 11's weight is 261 g, lighter than the catalogue median of 269 g (38% of the 167 other current shoes are lighter).
- Against the Hoka Clifton 10: weight lighter, firmness softer, forefoot base width narrower (details).
- 4 shoes with similar geometry from other lines.
Differences smaller than the precision of the sources (about 1 mm of stack, 8 g, or the spread between photos for photo estimates) are reported as about the same.
Specifications
- Heel-to-toe drop Manufacturer stated
- 8mm
- Heel stack Manufacturer stated
- 43mm
- Forefoot stack Manufacturer stated
- 35mm
- Weight Manufacturer stated
- 261g
- Plate
- No plate
- Primary foam
- CMEVA (compression-molded EVA)
- List price
- $155
Geometry
Percent values are relative to shoe length so they compare across images and sizes; widths in millimetres are lab measurements from the cited source, while toe tip and heel heights in millimetres are photo estimates converted for a men’s US 9 (assumed 300 mm long), so approximate. See how rocker geometry is defined.
- Toe rocker AI estimated
- 38%
4 photos range 35–38 %; shown is their median.
- Rocker radius AI estimated
- 51%
4 photos range 44–51 %; shown is one of the two that agree most closely.
- Rocker rise angle AI estimated
- 28deg
4 photos range 25–30 deg; shown is their median.
- Toe tip over ground AI estimated
- 43mm
4 photos range 41–44 mm; shown is their median.
- Rocker angle at toe AI estimated
- 62deg
4 photos range 54–62 deg; shown is one of the two that agree most closely.
- Visible rocker lift onset AI estimated
- 75.2%
4 photos range 75.2–76 %; shown is one of the two that agree most closely.
- Toe spring (relative) AI estimated
- 19.7%
4 photos range 17.9–21.5 %; shown is their median.
- Heel bevel length AI estimated
- 11.7%
4 photos range 11.6–13.6 %; shown is the average of the two that agree most closely.
- Heel bevel height AI estimated
- 22mm
4 photos range 21–25 mm; shown is the average of the two that agree most closely.
- Midsole width (forefoot) Externally measured
- 113.8mm
- Midsole width (heel) Externally measured
- 96.2mm
- Toe box shape AI estimated
- 79%
2 photos range 78–80 %; shown is the average of the two that agree most closely.
- Interior forefoot width Externally measured
- 94.7mm
- Toebox width Externally measured
- 70.9mm
Stiffness
- Longitudinal stiffness Derived
- 29/ 100
Lab reading: 13.5 N, force to bend the shoe 30° (lab bending test); the score is our 0–100 rescaling of it.
- Midsole firmness Derived
- 41/ 100
Lab reading: 31.1 Asker C, midsole durometer reading (higher = firmer); the score is our 0–100 rescaling of it.
How it compares
Appears in:High stackLonger toe rocker
Compare:Hoka Clifton 11 vs Hoka Clifton 10Hoka Clifton 11 vs ASICS Novablast 6Previous version: Hoka Clifton 10
What changed from the Hoka Clifton 10
Weight lighter, firmness softer, forefoot base width narrower. Compared with the previous version in this catalogue; differences within measurement noise are shown as about the same.
- Hoka Clifton 1143/35 mm · toe rocker 38 % · heel bevel 12 %
- Hoka Clifton 1043/35 mm · toe rocker 37 % · heel bevel 12 %
| Measure | Hoka Clifton 10 | Hoka Clifton 11 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Heel stack | 43 mm | 43 mm | about the same |
| Forefoot stack | 35 mm | 35 mm | about the same |
| Drop | 8 mm | 8 mm | about the same |
| Weight | 278 g | 261 g | lighter (−17 g) |
| Toe rocker | 36.8% of length | 37.7% of length | about the same |
| Toe tip over ground | 41.4 mm | 42.6 mm | about the same |
| Rocker rise angle | 27.7° | 27.9° | about the same |
| Stiffness | 35/100 | 29/100 | about the same |
| Firmness | 53/100 | 41/100 | softer (−12) |
| Forefoot base width | 116.9 mm | 113.8 mm | narrower (−3.1 mm) |
| Foam | CMEVA (compression-moulded EVA) | CMEVA (compression-molded EVA) | naming difference: same foam, described differently by the sources |
Wrong value? Missing data? Tell me
Sources
- Hoka Clifton 11 Review (2026) - Doctors of RunningreviewDoctors of Runningaccessed 2026-10-04open ↗
- HOKA Clifton 11 Men's Shoes Black/Neon Yuzu | Running WarehouseretailerRunning Warehouseaccessed 2026-10-04open ↗
- hoka-clifton-11 lateral product photoimageRunning Warehouseaccessed 2026-10-04open ↗
- hoka-clifton-11 medial product photoimageRunning Warehouseaccessed 2026-10-04open ↗
- hoka-clifton-11 lateral product photoimageRunning Warehouseaccessed 2026-10-04open ↗
- hoka-clifton-11 medial product photoimageRunning Warehouseaccessed 2026-10-04open ↗
- Cut in half: HOKA Clifton 11 Review (2026) | RunRepeatlabRunRepeataccessed 2026-10-04open ↗
- hoka-clifton-11 sole product photoimageRunning Warehouseaccessed 2026-10-04open ↗
- hoka-clifton-11 top product photoimageRunning Warehouseaccessed 2026-10-04open ↗
Technical detail: every recorded value, method and version (33)
All approved observations
Every recorded value, including superseded ones. The displayed value per metric is chosen by precedence (measured › stated › derived › AI estimated), then confidence, then recency. 58 further observations awaiting review.
| Metric | Value | Class | Confidence | Method | Source | Recorded |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Heel-to-toe drop | 8 mm | Stated | Medium | Spec listing | Doctors of Running | 2026-10-04 |
| Heel stack | 43 mm | Stated | Medium | Spec listing | Doctors of Running | 2026-10-04 |
| Heel stack | 43 mm | Stated | Medium | Spec listing | Running Warehouse | 2026-10-04 |
| Forefoot stack | 35 mm | Stated | Medium | Spec listing | Doctors of Running | 2026-10-04 |
| Forefoot stack | 35 mm | Stated | Medium | Spec listing | Running Warehouse | 2026-10-04 |
| Weight | 261 g (size 9) | Stated | Medium | Spec listing | Doctors of Running | 2026-10-04 |
| Weight | 261 g | Stated | Medium | Spec listing | Running Warehouse | 2026-10-04 |
| Rocker apex | 61.9 % | est. | Medium | Side photo | Running Warehouse | 2026-10-04 |
| Rocker apex | 61.8 % | est. | Medium | Side photo | Running Warehouse | 2026-10-04 |
| Rocker radius | 51 % | est. | Medium | Side photo | Running Warehouse | 2026-10-04 |
| Rocker radius | 49 % | est. | Medium | Side photo | Running Warehouse | 2026-10-04 |
| Rocker rise angle | 30 deg | est. | Low | Side photo | Running Warehouse | 2026-10-04 |
| Rocker rise angle | 30 deg | est. | Low | Side photo | Running Warehouse | 2026-10-04 |
| Toe tip over ground | 44 mm | est. | Medium | Side photo | Running Warehouse | 2026-10-04 |
| Rocker angle at toe | 62 deg | est. | Low | Side photo | Running Warehouse | 2026-10-04 |
| Toe tip over ground | 44 mm | est. | Low | Side photo | Running Warehouse | 2026-10-04 |
| Rocker angle at toe | 62 deg | est. | Low | Side photo | Running Warehouse | 2026-10-04 |
| Visible rocker lift onset | 75.3 % | est. | Low | Side photo | Running Warehouse | 2026-10-04 |
| Visible rocker lift onset | 75.2 % | est. | Medium | Side photo | Running Warehouse | 2026-10-04 |
| Toe spring (relative) | 18.5 % | est. | Medium | Side photo | Running Warehouse | 2026-10-04 |
| Toe spring (relative) | 17.9 % | est. | Medium | Side photo | Running Warehouse | 2026-10-04 |
| Heel bevel length | 11.8 % | est. | Medium | Side photo | Running Warehouse | 2026-10-04 |
| Heel bevel length | 11.6 % | est. | Low | Side photo | Running Warehouse | 2026-10-04 |
| Heel bevel height | 23 mm | est. | Medium | Side photo | Running Warehouse | 2026-10-04 |
| Heel bevel height | 22 mm | est. | Low | Side photo | Running Warehouse | 2026-10-04 |
| Midsole width (forefoot) | 113.8 mm | Measured | Medium | Lab test | RunRepeat | 2026-10-04 |
| Midsole width (heel) | 96.2 mm | Measured | Medium | Lab test | RunRepeat | 2026-10-04 |
| Toe box shape | 78 % | est. | Low | Top photo | Running Warehouse | 2026-10-04 |
| Toe box shape | 80 % | est. | Low | Top photo | Running Warehouse | 2026-10-04 |
| Interior forefoot width | 94.7 mm | Measured | Medium | Lab test | RunRepeat | 2026-10-04 |
| Toebox width | 70.9 mm | Measured | Medium | Lab test | RunRepeat | 2026-10-04 |
| Longitudinal stiffness | 29 | Derived | Medium | Lab flex test | RunRepeat | 2026-10-04 |
| Midsole firmness | 41 | Derived | Medium | Lab durometer | RunRepeat | 2026-10-04 |
Classes: Manufacturer stated · Externally measured · AI estimated · Derived · User reported. Hover a method for its identifier and algorithm version.
Source notes
- Running Warehouse: sha256=182225fc86a7e5adb444df925f12f22dcd93a830e4dead98fa2c6459fde6d780; 0.3
- Running Warehouse: sha256=d05baf1a58096efd8f2bfc7b7a76d4706fc9b879bb78f23b3718345dc5ffea3b; 0.3
- Running Warehouse: sha256=2daed0412ac8f7d49f8e93d0f3044dabaa2afd14333a061a44568ad9fc49f853; 0.3
- Running Warehouse: sha256=6dfe1fbaebf19ad640e2e20d85f26d9fe3f93f0549d572fccecf90e31eac97a8; 0.3
- Running Warehouse: sha256=fd5cae084e9294246b34532f256447984ea7ab14217f74d56de8d58f7e6a29bb; 0.1
- Running Warehouse: sha256=5c63713a3c9c761e2935869b5c2643dbf02c31af5503dd35d18d8f108d7fc290; 0.1
Shoes with similar geometry
Compare these →Closest current models from other lines by stack, drop, rocker, toe height, stiffness, firmness, weight and width, whichever both shoes have.
- Drop
- 7 mm
- Heel
- 44 mm
- Toe rocker
- 39%
Very close on every shared measure
- Drop
- 8 mm
- Heel
- 41 mm
- Toe rocker
- 36%
Very close on every shared measure
- Drop
- 8 mm
- Heel
- 41.5 mm
- Toe rocker
- 34%
vs this shoe: firmer foam
- Drop
- 6 mm
- Heel
- 40.5 mm
- Toe rocker
- 37%
vs this shoe: 2 mm less drop