ASICS Sonicblast 2
At a glance
- Heel-to-toe drop
- 8 mmStated
- Stack, heel / forefoot
- 46 / 38 mmStated
- Weight
- 241 gStatedUS M9
- Plate
- Pebax plate
- Toe rocker
- 35 % of lengthest.photos 34–37 %
- Heel bevel
- 10.4 % of lengthest.rough estimate; photos 10–13 %
- Stiffness / firmness
- not measured yet
- Primary foam
- FF Turbo Squared top / FF Blast Max bottom
How it compares
- ASICS Sonicblast 2's heel-to-toe drop is 8 mm, higher than the catalogue median of 6 mm (59% of the 179 other current shoes are lower).
- ASICS Sonicblast 2's heel stack is 46 mm, thicker than the catalogue median of 38 mm (95% of the 176 other current shoes are thinner).
- ASICS Sonicblast 2's forefoot stack is 38 mm, thicker than the catalogue median of 31.5 mm (91% of the 171 other current shoes are thinner).
- ASICS Sonicblast 2's weight is 241 g, lighter than the catalogue median of 269 g (23% of the 167 other current shoes are lighter).
- 4 shoes with similar geometry from other lines.
Differences smaller than the precision of the sources (about 1 mm of stack, 8 g, or the spread between photos for photo estimates) are reported as about the same.
Specifications
- Heel-to-toe drop Manufacturer stated
- 8mm
- Heel stack Manufacturer stated
- 46mm
- Forefoot stack Manufacturer stated
- 38mm
- Weight Manufacturer stated
- 241g
- Plate
- Pebax plate
- Primary foam
- FF Turbo Squared top / FF Blast Max bottom
- List price
- $190
Geometry
Percent values are relative to shoe length so they compare across images and sizes; widths in millimetres are lab measurements from the cited source, while toe tip and heel heights in millimetres are photo estimates converted for a men’s US 9 (assumed 300 mm long), so approximate. See how rocker geometry is defined.
- Toe rocker AI estimated
- 35%
4 photos range 34–37 %; shown is their median.
- Rocker radius AI estimated
- 37%
4 photos range 37–45 %; shown is one of the two that agree most closely.
- Rocker rise angle AI estimated
- 31deg
4 photos range 28–34 deg; shown is their median.
- Toe tip over ground AI estimated
- 46mm*
4 photos range 44–49 mm; shown is their median (* the photos disagree by more than usual).
- Rocker angle at toe AI estimated
- 67deg
4 photos range 57–67 deg; shown is one of the two that agree most closely.
- Visible rocker lift onset AI estimated
- 76.4%
4 photos range 73.9–76.4 %; shown is one of the two that agree most closely.
- Toe spring (relative) AI estimated
- 21.1%
4 photos range 19.4–23.5 %; shown is their median.
- Heel bevel length AI estimated
- 10.4%
4 photos range 9.6–12.5 %; shown is the average of the two that agree most closely.
- Heel bevel height AI estimated
- 21mm*
4 photos range 18–22 mm; shown is the average of the two that agree most closely (* the photos disagree by more than usual).
- Toe box shape AI estimated
- 70%
2 photos range 69–70 %; shown is the average of the two that agree most closely.
How it compares
Appears in:High stack
Compare:ASICS Sonicblast 2 vs Brooks Hyperion Max 4ASICS Sonicblast 2 vs Saucony Endorphin Trainer
Wrong value? Missing data? Tell me
Sources
- ASICS Sonicblast 2 Review (2026) - Doctors of RunningreviewDoctors of Runningaccessed 2026-10-04open ↗
- Can the Asics Sonicblast 2 repeat as super trainer of the year? | Believe in the RunreviewBelieve in the Runaccessed 2026-10-04open ↗
- ASICS SONICBLAST 2 Men's Shoes Energy Aqua/Yellow | Running WarehouseretailerRunning Warehouseaccessed 2026-10-04open ↗
- asics-sonicblast-2 medial product photoimageRunning Warehouseaccessed 2026-10-04open ↗
- asics-sonicblast-2 lateral product photoimageRunning Warehouseaccessed 2026-10-04open ↗
- asics-sonicblast-2 medial product photoimageRunning Warehouseaccessed 2026-10-04open ↗
- asics-sonicblast-2 lateral product photoimageRunning Warehouseaccessed 2026-10-04open ↗
- asics-sonicblast-2 top product photoimageRunning Warehouseaccessed 2026-10-04open ↗
- asics-sonicblast-2 sole product photoimageRunning Warehouseaccessed 2026-10-04open ↗
Technical detail: every recorded value, method and version (32)
All approved observations
Every recorded value, including superseded ones. The displayed value per metric is chosen by precedence (measured › stated › derived › AI estimated), then confidence, then recency. 59 further observations awaiting review.
| Metric | Value | Class | Confidence | Method | Source | Recorded |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Heel-to-toe drop | 8 mm | Stated | Medium | Spec listing | Doctors of Running | 2026-10-04 |
| Heel-to-toe drop | 8 mm | Stated | Medium | Spec listing | Believe in the Run | 2026-10-04 |
| Heel stack | 45 mm | Stated | Medium | Spec listing | Doctors of Running | 2026-10-04 |
| Heel stack | 46 mm | Stated | Medium | Spec listing | Doctors of Running | 2026-10-04 |
| Heel stack | 45 mm | Stated | Medium | Spec listing | Running Warehouse | 2026-10-04 |
| Heel stack | 46 mm | Stated | Medium | Spec listing | Believe in the Run | 2026-10-04 |
| Forefoot stack | 37 mm | Stated | Medium | Spec listing | Doctors of Running | 2026-10-04 |
| Forefoot stack | 38 mm | Stated | Medium | Spec listing | Doctors of Running | 2026-10-04 |
| Forefoot stack | 38 mm | Stated | Medium | Spec listing | Believe in the Run | 2026-10-04 |
| Forefoot stack | 37 mm | Stated | Medium | Spec listing | Running Warehouse | 2026-10-04 |
| Weight | 241 g (size 9) | Stated | Medium | Spec listing | Doctors of Running | 2026-10-04 |
| Weight | 241 g (US M9) | Stated | Medium | Spec listing | Believe in the Run | 2026-10-04 |
| Rocker apex | 64.7 % | est. | Medium | Side photo | Running Warehouse | 2026-10-04 |
| Rocker apex | 65.1 % | est. | Medium | Side photo | Running Warehouse | 2026-10-04 |
| Rocker radius | 38 % | est. | Medium | Side photo | Running Warehouse | 2026-10-04 |
| Rocker radius | 37 % | est. | Medium | Side photo | Running Warehouse | 2026-10-04 |
| Rocker rise angle | 34 deg | est. | Medium | Side photo | Running Warehouse | 2026-10-04 |
| Rocker rise angle | 34 deg | est. | Medium | Side photo | Running Warehouse | 2026-10-04 |
| Rocker angle at toe | 67 deg | est. | Medium | Side photo | Running Warehouse | 2026-10-04 |
| Rocker angle at toe | 67 deg | est. | Medium | Side photo | Running Warehouse | 2026-10-04 |
| Toe tip over ground | 44 mm | est. | Medium | Side photo | Running Warehouse | 2026-10-04 |
| Toe tip over ground | 44 mm | est. | Medium | Side photo | Running Warehouse | 2026-10-04 |
| Visible rocker lift onset | 75.8 % | est. | Medium | Side photo | Running Warehouse | 2026-10-04 |
| Visible rocker lift onset | 76.4 % | est. | Medium | Side photo | Running Warehouse | 2026-10-04 |
| Toe spring (relative) | 19.4 % | est. | Medium | Side photo | Running Warehouse | 2026-10-04 |
| Toe spring (relative) | 19.4 % | est. | Medium | Side photo | Running Warehouse | 2026-10-04 |
| Heel bevel length | 10.6 % | est. | Medium | Side photo | Running Warehouse | 2026-10-04 |
| Heel bevel length | 10.2 % | est. | Medium | Side photo | Running Warehouse | 2026-10-04 |
| Heel bevel height | 21 mm | est. | Medium | Side photo | Running Warehouse | 2026-10-04 |
| Heel bevel height | 21 mm | est. | Medium | Side photo | Running Warehouse | 2026-10-04 |
| Toe box shape | 69 % | est. | Low | Top photo | Running Warehouse | 2026-10-04 |
| Toe box shape | 70 % | est. | Low | Top photo | Running Warehouse | 2026-10-04 |
Classes: Manufacturer stated · Externally measured · AI estimated · Derived · User reported. Hover a method for its identifier and algorithm version.
Source notes
- Running Warehouse: sha256=b5aa398f666aa466919665d1f9e0a1351608389789bd8bff13c2cf5ffd9de44d; 0.3
- Running Warehouse: sha256=9d2b89be986a69ad30e5c74602e937c824709150cbca1f88de66d11975dc5666; 0.3
- Running Warehouse: sha256=d130518f2a8c1803802710ffc6c864949f3bc1da751a15209fd30238add18c90; 0.3
- Running Warehouse: sha256=79f582a27150277850004bf9d6b4f8423451247ffb8bbc4864d966d1a569af66; 0.3
- Running Warehouse: sha256=64ba9a37ff2ddb66078c478073a69d4807155e1829571672eaabecd222e88313; 0.1
- Running Warehouse: sha256=336e351bea8bd0aa55ac8a671fe8e083bbef9fca3ce49d460b7dfb1f649c97f3; 0.1
Shoes with similar geometry
Compare these →Closest current models from other lines by stack, drop, rocker, toe height, stiffness, firmness, weight and width, whichever both shoes have.
- Drop
- 6 mm
- Heel
- 46 mm
- Toe rocker
- 36%
vs this shoe: 2 mm less drop · 20 g heavier
- Drop
- 8 mm
- Heel
- 41.5 mm
- Toe rocker
- 34%
vs this shoe: 5 mm lower heel
- Drop
- 8 mm
- Heel
- 45 mm
- Toe rocker
- 32%
Very close on every shared measure
- Drop
- 6 mm
- Heel
- 45 mm
- Toe rocker
- 32%
vs this shoe: 2 mm less drop