ShoeGeometry

ASICS Sonicblast 2

TempoRoadPebax plate2026Men'sCurrent

At a glance

Heel-to-toe drop
8 mmStated
Stack, heel / forefoot
46 / 38 mmStated
Weight
241 gStatedUS M9
Plate
Pebax plate
Toe rocker
35 % of lengthest.photos 34–37 %
Heel bevel
10.4 % of lengthest.rough estimate; photos 10–13 %
Stiffness / firmness
not measured yet
Primary foam
FF Turbo Squared top / FF Blast Max bottom

How it compares

  • ASICS Sonicblast 2's heel-to-toe drop is 8 mm, higher than the catalogue median of 6 mm (59% of the 179 other current shoes are lower).
  • ASICS Sonicblast 2's heel stack is 46 mm, thicker than the catalogue median of 38 mm (95% of the 176 other current shoes are thinner).
  • ASICS Sonicblast 2's forefoot stack is 38 mm, thicker than the catalogue median of 31.5 mm (91% of the 171 other current shoes are thinner).
  • ASICS Sonicblast 2's weight is 241 g, lighter than the catalogue median of 269 g (23% of the 167 other current shoes are lighter).
  • 4 shoes with similar geometry from other lines.

Differences smaller than the precision of the sources (about 1 mm of stack, 8 g, or the spread between photos for photo estimates) are reported as about the same.

Specifications

Heel-to-toe drop
Manufacturer stated
8mm
MediumSpec listingbrand figure, reported by Believe in the Runsource
Heel stack
Manufacturer stated
46mm
MediumSpec listingbrand figure, reported by Believe in the Runsource
Forefoot stack
Manufacturer stated
38mm
MediumSpec listingbrand figure, reported by Believe in the Runsource
Weight
Manufacturer stated
241g
MediumSpec listingbrand figure, reported by Believe in the RunUS M9source
Plate
Pebax plate
Primary foam
FF Turbo Squared top / FF Blast Max bottom
List price
$190

Geometry

Catalogue average: heel 38 mm, forefoot 32 mm, toe rocker 34 %ASICS Sonicblast 2: heel 46 mm, forefoot 38 mm (drop 8 mm); toe rocker 35 % of length, radius 37 % of length; heel bevel 10 % of length, 21 mm high at the back, ending about under the heel bone.46 mm38 mmUnder the centre of the heel bone: 12 % of length from the heel, where heel stack is measuredheel boneHeel contact: the sole is within 4.5 mm of the ground from 10 % of length (foam compresses more under load), ending about under the heel boneheel bevel 10 %Toe rocker: the front 35 % of the length curves up (the curve leaves the ground 65 % of length from the heel)toe rocker 35 %toeheel
Front: toe rocker shorter longerRear: heel stack lower higher not measured
Dashed: average of the catalogue
Illustrative profile, not a photograph or scan: drawn to scale for a 300 mm shoe from published stack heights and photo estimates of the unloaded shoe (under body weight the foam compresses and the curves flatten). The grey upper is a generic outline, not this shoe’s. ASICS Sonicblast 2: heel 46 mm, forefoot 38 mm (drop 8 mm); toe rocker 35 % of length, radius 37 % of length; heel bevel 10 % of length, 21 mm high at the back, ending about under the heel bone. Heel bone: 12 % of length from the heel, where heel stack is measured. Heel bevel and toe rocker are marked where each curve meets the ground; for the heel that is where the sole comes within 4.5 mm of the ground, which foam compression closes under body weight.

Percent values are relative to shoe length so they compare across images and sizes; widths in millimetres are lab measurements from the cited source, while toe tip and heel heights in millimetres are photo estimates converted for a men’s US 9 (assumed 300 mm long), so approximate. See how rocker geometry is defined.

Toe rocker
AI estimated
35%

4 photos range 34–37 %; shown is their median.

MediumSide photosource
Rocker radius
AI estimated
37%

4 photos range 37–45 %; shown is one of the two that agree most closely.

MediumSide photosource
Rocker rise angle
AI estimated
31deg

4 photos range 28–34 deg; shown is their median.

MediumSide photosource
Toe tip over ground
AI estimated
46mm*

4 photos range 44–49 mm; shown is their median (* the photos disagree by more than usual).

MediumSide photosource
Rocker angle at toe
AI estimated
67deg

4 photos range 57–67 deg; shown is one of the two that agree most closely.

MediumSide photosource
Visible rocker lift onset
AI estimated
76.4%

4 photos range 73.9–76.4 %; shown is one of the two that agree most closely.

MediumSide photosource
Toe spring (relative)
AI estimated
21.1%

4 photos range 19.4–23.5 %; shown is their median.

MediumSide photosource
Heel bevel length
AI estimated
10.4%

4 photos range 9.6–12.5 %; shown is the average of the two that agree most closely.

MediumSide photosource
Heel bevel height
AI estimated
21mm*

4 photos range 18–22 mm; shown is the average of the two that agree most closely (* the photos disagree by more than usual).

MediumSide photosource
Toe box shape
AI estimated
70%

2 photos range 69–70 %; shown is the average of the two that agree most closely.

LowTop photosource

How it compares

Appears in:High stack

Compare:ASICS Sonicblast 2 vs Brooks Hyperion Max 4ASICS Sonicblast 2 vs Saucony Endorphin Trainer

Wrong value? Missing data? Tell me
Stored only to improve the site; see privacy.

Sources

  • ASICS Sonicblast 2 Review (2026) - Doctors of RunningreviewDoctors of Runningaccessed 2026-10-04open ↗
  • Can the Asics Sonicblast 2 repeat as super trainer of the year? | Believe in the RunreviewBelieve in the Runaccessed 2026-10-04open ↗
  • ASICS SONICBLAST 2 Men's Shoes Energy Aqua/Yellow | Running WarehouseretailerRunning Warehouseaccessed 2026-10-04open ↗
  • asics-sonicblast-2 medial product photoimageRunning Warehouseaccessed 2026-10-04open ↗
  • asics-sonicblast-2 lateral product photoimageRunning Warehouseaccessed 2026-10-04open ↗
  • asics-sonicblast-2 medial product photoimageRunning Warehouseaccessed 2026-10-04open ↗
  • asics-sonicblast-2 lateral product photoimageRunning Warehouseaccessed 2026-10-04open ↗
  • asics-sonicblast-2 top product photoimageRunning Warehouseaccessed 2026-10-04open ↗
  • asics-sonicblast-2 sole product photoimageRunning Warehouseaccessed 2026-10-04open ↗
Technical detail: every recorded value, method and version (32)

All approved observations

Every recorded value, including superseded ones. The displayed value per metric is chosen by precedence (measured › stated › derived › AI estimated), then confidence, then recency. 59 further observations awaiting review.

MetricValueClassConfidenceMethodSourceRecorded
Heel-to-toe drop8 mmStatedMediumSpec listingDoctors of Running2026-10-04
Heel-to-toe drop8 mmStatedMediumSpec listingBelieve in the Run2026-10-04
Heel stack45 mmStatedMediumSpec listingDoctors of Running2026-10-04
Heel stack46 mmStatedMediumSpec listingDoctors of Running2026-10-04
Heel stack45 mmStatedMediumSpec listingRunning Warehouse2026-10-04
Heel stack46 mmStatedMediumSpec listingBelieve in the Run2026-10-04
Forefoot stack37 mmStatedMediumSpec listingDoctors of Running2026-10-04
Forefoot stack38 mmStatedMediumSpec listingDoctors of Running2026-10-04
Forefoot stack38 mmStatedMediumSpec listingBelieve in the Run2026-10-04
Forefoot stack37 mmStatedMediumSpec listingRunning Warehouse2026-10-04
Weight241 g (size 9)StatedMediumSpec listingDoctors of Running2026-10-04
Weight241 g (US M9)StatedMediumSpec listingBelieve in the Run2026-10-04
Rocker apex64.7 %est.MediumSide photoRunning Warehouse2026-10-04
Rocker apex65.1 %est.MediumSide photoRunning Warehouse2026-10-04
Rocker radius38 %est.MediumSide photoRunning Warehouse2026-10-04
Rocker radius37 %est.MediumSide photoRunning Warehouse2026-10-04
Rocker rise angle34 degest.MediumSide photoRunning Warehouse2026-10-04
Rocker rise angle34 degest.MediumSide photoRunning Warehouse2026-10-04
Rocker angle at toe67 degest.MediumSide photoRunning Warehouse2026-10-04
Rocker angle at toe67 degest.MediumSide photoRunning Warehouse2026-10-04
Toe tip over ground44 mmest.MediumSide photoRunning Warehouse2026-10-04
Toe tip over ground44 mmest.MediumSide photoRunning Warehouse2026-10-04
Visible rocker lift onset75.8 %est.MediumSide photoRunning Warehouse2026-10-04
Visible rocker lift onset76.4 %est.MediumSide photoRunning Warehouse2026-10-04
Toe spring (relative)19.4 %est.MediumSide photoRunning Warehouse2026-10-04
Toe spring (relative)19.4 %est.MediumSide photoRunning Warehouse2026-10-04
Heel bevel length10.6 %est.MediumSide photoRunning Warehouse2026-10-04
Heel bevel length10.2 %est.MediumSide photoRunning Warehouse2026-10-04
Heel bevel height21 mmest.MediumSide photoRunning Warehouse2026-10-04
Heel bevel height21 mmest.MediumSide photoRunning Warehouse2026-10-04
Toe box shape69 %est.LowTop photoRunning Warehouse2026-10-04
Toe box shape70 %est.LowTop photoRunning Warehouse2026-10-04

Classes: Manufacturer stated · Externally measured · AI estimated · Derived · User reported. Hover a method for its identifier and algorithm version.

Source notes

  • Running Warehouse: sha256=b5aa398f666aa466919665d1f9e0a1351608389789bd8bff13c2cf5ffd9de44d; 0.3
  • Running Warehouse: sha256=9d2b89be986a69ad30e5c74602e937c824709150cbca1f88de66d11975dc5666; 0.3
  • Running Warehouse: sha256=d130518f2a8c1803802710ffc6c864949f3bc1da751a15209fd30238add18c90; 0.3
  • Running Warehouse: sha256=79f582a27150277850004bf9d6b4f8423451247ffb8bbc4864d966d1a569af66; 0.3
  • Running Warehouse: sha256=64ba9a37ff2ddb66078c478073a69d4807155e1829571672eaabecd222e88313; 0.1
  • Running Warehouse: sha256=336e351bea8bd0aa55ac8a671fe8e083bbef9fca3ce49d460b7dfb1f649c97f3; 0.1
Compare these →

Closest current models from other lines by stack, drop, rocker, toe height, stiffness, firmness, weight and width, whichever both shoes have.