ASICS Trabuco 14 vs Hoka Mafate 5
Two popular shoes in the same category, compared on measured geometry. Each cell carries a provenance badge; open a shoe for sources.
- ASICS Trabuco 1436/28 mm · toe rocker 32 % · heel bevel 10 %
- Hoka Mafate 544/36 mm · toe rocker 38 % · heel bevel 10 %
Which suits you
| If you want | Pick | Because |
|---|---|---|
| A smoother roll at toe-off | Hoka Mafate 5 | 32.4 vs 38.1 % toe rocker |
| More cushioning under the heel | Hoka Mafate 5 | 36 vs 44 mm heel stack |
| More under the forefoot | Hoka Mafate 5 | 28 vs 36 mm forefoot stack |
| A lower drop | About the same | 8 vs 8 mm drop |
| A stiffer, snappier forefoot | About the same | 57 vs 48 /100 stiffness |
| A firmer, more stable feel | Hoka Mafate 5 | 60 vs 70 /100 firmness |
| A wider base under the forefoot | Hoka Mafate 5 | 113.5 vs 119.2 mm forefoot base |
| Less weight | ASICS Trabuco 14 | 278 vs 314 g |
From the values below, with differences inside measurement noise shown as about the same. This describes the shoes, not what is right for your feet; comfort in the first few runs decides.
| Metric | ASICS Trabuco 14 Trail · Trail | Hoka Mafate 5 Trail · Trail |
|---|---|---|
| Heel-to-toe drop | 8 mmDerived | 8 mmDerived |
| Heel stack | 36 mmStated | 44 mmStated |
| Forefoot stack | 28 mmStated | 36 mmStated |
| Weight | 278 gStated | 314 gStated |
| Toe rocker | 32 %est. | 38 %est. |
| Rocker radius | 36 %est. | 50 %est. |
| Rocker rise angle | 29 degest. | 28 degest. |
| Rocker angle at toe | 66 degest. | 60 degest. |
| Toe tip over ground | 37 mmest. | 43 mm*est. |
| Visible rocker lift onset | 80.6 %est. | 75.4 %est. |
| Toe spring (relative) | 18.1 %est. | 19.6 %est. |
| Heel bevel length | 9.6 %est. | 10.2 %est. |
| Heel bevel height | 24 mmest. | 20 mm*est. |
| Midsole width (forefoot) | 113.5 mmMeasured | 119.2 mmMeasured |
| Midsole width (heel) | 89.5 mmMeasured | 98.7 mmMeasured |
| Toe box shape | 79 %est. | — |
| Interior forefoot width | 100.3 mmMeasured | 95.5 mmMeasured |
| Toebox width | 76.3 mmMeasured | 74.2 mmMeasured |
| Longitudinal stiffness | 57Derived | 48Derived |
| Midsole firmness | 60Derived | 70Derived |
| Plate | Rock plate | TPU plate |
| Primary foam | FF Blast Max | supercritical EVA + CMEVA |
| List price | $145 | $185 |
Key differences
- Heel-to-toe drop is about the same: 8 mm for ASICS Trabuco 14, 8 mm for Hoka Mafate 5.
- ASICS Trabuco 14's heel stack is 36 mm, 8 mm thinner than Hoka Mafate 5's 44 mm.
- ASICS Trabuco 14's forefoot stack is 28 mm, 8 mm thinner than Hoka Mafate 5's 36 mm.
- ASICS Trabuco 14's weight is 278 g, 36 g lighter than Hoka Mafate 5's 314 g.
- ASICS Trabuco 14's toe rocker is 32 % of length, 6 % of length shorter than Hoka Mafate 5's 38 % of length.
Read more about both shoes
We measure the shape. For how they feel over many miles, and for lab tests of cushioning, grip and fit:
ASICS Trabuco 14
- RunRepeat · lab test
Hoka Mafate 5
- Believe in the Run · tester review
- RunRepeat · lab test
Independent sites; we are not affiliated with them.
ASICS Trabuco 14 details · Hoka Mafate 5 details · Add more shoes