Brooks Cascadia Elite vs Hoka Speedgoat 7
Two popular shoes in the same category, compared on measured geometry. Each cell carries a provenance badge; open a shoe for sources.
- Brooks Cascadia Elite40/34 mm · toe rocker 38 % · heel bevel 12 %
- Hoka Speedgoat 737/33 mm · toe rocker 43 % · heel bevel 12 %
Which suits you
| If you want | Pick | Because |
|---|---|---|
| A smoother roll at toe-off | Hoka Speedgoat 7 | 38.1 vs 43.2 % toe rocker |
| More cushioning under the heel | Brooks Cascadia Elite | 40 vs 37 mm heel stack |
| More under the forefoot | About the same | 34 vs 33 mm forefoot stack |
| A lower drop | Hoka Speedgoat 7 | 6 vs 4 mm drop |
| A stiffer, snappier forefoot | About the same | 39 vs 34 /100 stiffness |
| A firmer, more stable feel | Hoka Speedgoat 7 | 23 vs 70 /100 firmness |
| A wider base under the forefoot | About the same | 116.9 vs 117.4 mm forefoot base |
From the values below, with differences inside measurement noise shown as about the same. This describes the shoes, not what is right for your feet; comfort in the first few runs decides.
| Metric | Brooks Cascadia Elite Trail · Trail | Hoka Speedgoat 7 Trail · Trail |
|---|---|---|
| Heel-to-toe drop | 6 mmDerived | 4 mmDerived |
| Heel stack | 40 mmStated | 37 mmStated |
| Forefoot stack | 34 mmStated | 33 mmStated |
| Weight | 266 gStated | 275 gStated |
| Toe rocker | 38 %est. | 43 %est. |
| Rocker radius | 47 %est. | 60 %est. |
| Rocker rise angle | 28 degest. | 23 degest. |
| Rocker angle at toe | 59 degest. | 55 degest. |
| Toe tip over ground | 46 mm*est. | 43 mm*est. |
| Visible rocker lift onset | 73.9 %est. | 74 %est. |
| Toe spring (relative) | 20.8 %est. | 18.6 %est. |
| Heel bevel length | 12.4 %est. | 12.4 %est. |
| Heel bevel height | 19 mm*est. | 21 mm*est. |
| Midsole width (forefoot) | 116.9 mmMeasured | 117.4 mmMeasured |
| Midsole width (heel) | 100.9 mmMeasured | 96 mmMeasured |
| Toe box shape | 79 %est. | — |
| Interior forefoot width | 92.6 mmMeasured | 94.8 mmMeasured |
| Toebox width | 71.6 mmMeasured | 71.4 mmMeasured |
| Longitudinal stiffness | 39Derived | 34Derived |
| Midsole firmness | 23Derived | 70Derived |
| Plate | Carbon composite | No plate |
| Primary foam | DNA Gold (PEBA) | supercritical EVA |
| List price | $275 | $165 |
Key differences
- Brooks Cascadia Elite's heel-to-toe drop is 6 mm, 2 mm higher than Hoka Speedgoat 7's 4 mm.
- Brooks Cascadia Elite's heel stack is 40 mm, 3 mm thicker than Hoka Speedgoat 7's 37 mm.
- Brooks Cascadia Elite's forefoot stack is 34 mm, 1 mm thicker than Hoka Speedgoat 7's 33 mm.
- Brooks Cascadia Elite's weight is 266 g, 9 g lighter than Hoka Speedgoat 7's 275 g.
- Brooks Cascadia Elite's toe rocker is 38 % of length, 5 % of length shorter than Hoka Speedgoat 7's 43 % of length.
Read more about both shoes
We measure the shape. For how they feel over many miles, and for lab tests of cushioning, grip and fit:
Brooks Cascadia Elite
- Believe in the Run · tester review
- RunRepeat · lab test
Hoka Speedgoat 7
- Believe in the Run · tester review
- RunRepeat · lab test
Independent sites; we are not affiliated with them.
Brooks Cascadia Elite details · Hoka Speedgoat 7 details · Add more shoes