Brooks Ghost AMP vs Hoka Mach 7
Two shoes compared on measured geometry. Each cell carries a provenance badge; open a shoe for sources.
- Brooks Ghost AMP36/30 mm · toe rocker 33 % · heel bevel 9 %
- Hoka Mach 737/32 mm · toe rocker 38 % · heel bevel 10 %
Which suits you
| If you want | Pick | Because |
|---|---|---|
| A smoother roll at toe-off | Hoka Mach 7 | 32.7 vs 38 % toe rocker |
| More cushioning under the heel | About the same | 36 vs 37 mm heel stack |
| More under the forefoot | Hoka Mach 7 | 30 vs 32 mm forefoot stack |
| A lower drop | Hoka Mach 7 | 6 vs 5 mm drop |
| A stiffer, snappier forefoot | Hoka Mach 7 | 15 vs 33 /100 stiffness |
| A firmer, more stable feel | Hoka Mach 7 | 52 vs 82 /100 firmness |
| A wider base under the forefoot | Hoka Mach 7 | 112.2 vs 115.5 mm forefoot base |
| Less weight | Hoka Mach 7 | 255 vs 241 g |
From the values below, with differences inside measurement noise shown as about the same. This describes the shoes, not what is right for your feet; comfort in the first few runs decides.
| Metric | Brooks Ghost AMP Daily trainer · Road | Hoka Mach 7 Daily trainer · Road |
|---|---|---|
| Heel-to-toe drop | 6 mmStated | 5 mmDerived |
| Heel stack | 36 mmStated | 37 mmStated |
| Forefoot stack | 30 mmStated | 32 mmStated |
| Weight | 255 gStated | 241 gStated |
| Toe rocker | 33 %est. | 38 %est. |
| Rocker radius | 40 %est. | 45 %est. |
| Rocker rise angle | 30 degest. | 28 degest. |
| Rocker angle at toe | 63 degest. | 54 degest. |
| Toe tip over ground | 39 mm*est. | 48 mmest. |
| Visible rocker lift onset | 78.1 %est. | 73.8 %est. |
| Toe spring (relative) | 19.2 %est. | 20.1 %est. |
| Heel bevel length | 8.9 %est. | 9.7 %est. |
| Heel bevel height | 19 mm*est. | 17 mmest. |
| Midsole width (forefoot) | 112.2 mmMeasured | 115.5 mmMeasured |
| Midsole width (heel) | 94.2 mmMeasured | 93.3 mmMeasured |
| Toe box shape | 72 %est. | — |
| Interior forefoot width | 94.4 mmMeasured | 92.5 mmMeasured |
| Toebox width | 71 mmMeasured | 72.9 mmMeasured |
| Longitudinal stiffness | 15Derived | 33Derived |
| Midsole firmness | 52Derived | 82Derived |
| Plate | No plate | No plate |
| Primary foam | DNA Hype (PEBA/EVA blend) | supercritical EVA |
| List price | $150 | $145 |
Key differences
- Brooks Ghost AMP's heel-to-toe drop is 6 mm, 1 mm higher than Hoka Mach 7's 5 mm.
- Brooks Ghost AMP's heel stack is 36 mm, 1 mm thinner than Hoka Mach 7's 37 mm.
- Brooks Ghost AMP's forefoot stack is 30 mm, 2 mm thinner than Hoka Mach 7's 32 mm.
- Brooks Ghost AMP's weight is 255 g, 14 g heavier than Hoka Mach 7's 241 g.
- Brooks Ghost AMP's toe rocker is 33 % of length, 5 % of length shorter than Hoka Mach 7's 38 % of length.
Read more about both shoes
We measure the shape. For how they feel over many miles, and for lab tests of cushioning, grip and fit:
Brooks Ghost AMP
- Believe in the Run · tester review
- RTINGS · lab test
- RunRepeat · lab test
Hoka Mach 7
- Believe in the Run · tester review
- RTINGS · lab test
- RunRepeat · lab test
Independent sites; we are not affiliated with them.
Brooks Ghost AMP details · Hoka Mach 7 details · Add more shoes