Brooks Hyperion Max 4 vs Hoka Mach X 3
Two shoes compared on measured geometry. Each cell carries a provenance badge; open a shoe for sources.
- Brooks Hyperion Max 445/39 mm · toe rocker 36 % · heel bevel 13 %
- Hoka Mach X 346/41 mm · toe rocker 36 % · heel bevel 14 %
Which suits you
| If you want | Pick | Because |
|---|---|---|
| A smoother roll at toe-off | Brooks Hyperion Max 4 | 35.7 vs 35.5 % toe rocker; 47.5 vs 42.1 mm toe tip |
| More cushioning under the heel | About the same | 45 vs 46 mm heel stack |
| More under the forefoot | Hoka Mach X 3 | 39 vs 41 mm forefoot stack |
| A lower drop | Hoka Mach X 3 | 6 vs 5 mm drop |
| A stiffer, snappier forefoot | About the same | 58 vs 52 /100 stiffness |
| A firmer, more stable feel | Hoka Mach X 3 | 15 vs 46 /100 firmness |
| A wider base under the forefoot | Brooks Hyperion Max 4 | 119 vs 115.4 mm forefoot base |
| Less weight | About the same | 286 vs 289 g |
From the values below, with differences inside measurement noise shown as about the same. This describes the shoes, not what is right for your feet; comfort in the first few runs decides.
| Metric | Brooks Hyperion Max 4 Tempo · Road | Hoka Mach X 3 Tempo · Road |
|---|---|---|
| Heel-to-toe drop | 6 mmStated | 5 mmStated |
| Heel stack | 45 mmStated | 46 mmStated |
| Forefoot stack | 39 mmStated | 41 mmStated |
| Weight | 286 gStated | 289 gStated |
| Toe rocker | 36 %est. | 36 %est. |
| Rocker radius | 43 %est. | 45 %est. |
| Rocker rise angle | 30 degest. | 29 degest. |
| Rocker angle at toe | 57 degest. | 57 degest. |
| Toe tip over ground | 48 mm*est. | 42 mm*est. |
| Visible rocker lift onset | 75.4 %est. | 76.6 %est. |
| Toe spring (relative) | 20.5 %est. | 20.3 %est. |
| Heel bevel length | 13.2 %est. | 13.6 %est. |
| Heel bevel height | 23 mm*est. | 28 mm*est. |
| Midsole width (forefoot) | 119 mmMeasured | 115.4 mmMeasured |
| Midsole width (heel) | 86.8 mmMeasured | 89.1 mmMeasured |
| Toe box shape | — | 75 %est. |
| Interior forefoot width | 92.7 mmMeasured | 91.6 mmMeasured |
| Toebox width | 71.7 mmMeasured | 70.8 mmMeasured |
| Longitudinal stiffness | 58Derived | 52Derived |
| Midsole firmness | 15Derived | 46Derived |
| Plate | Nylon plate | Pebax plate |
| Primary foam | DNA Gold (PEBA) | PEBA top layer + EVA base |
| List price | $200 | $190 |
Key differences
- Brooks Hyperion Max 4's heel-to-toe drop is 6 mm, 1 mm higher than Hoka Mach X 3's 5 mm.
- Brooks Hyperion Max 4's heel stack is 45 mm, 1 mm thinner than Hoka Mach X 3's 46 mm.
- Brooks Hyperion Max 4's forefoot stack is 39 mm, 2 mm thinner than Hoka Mach X 3's 41 mm.
- Weight is about the same: 286 g for Brooks Hyperion Max 4, 289 g for Hoka Mach X 3.
- Toe rocker is about the same: 36 % of length for Brooks Hyperion Max 4, 36 % of length for Hoka Mach X 3.
Read more about both shoes
We measure the shape. For how they feel over many miles, and for lab tests of cushioning, grip and fit:
Brooks Hyperion Max 4
- Believe in the Run · tester review
- RTINGS · lab test
- RunRepeat · lab test
Hoka Mach X 3
- Believe in the Run · tester review
- RTINGS · lab test
- RunRepeat · lab test
Independent sites; we are not affiliated with them.
Brooks Hyperion Max 4 details · Hoka Mach X 3 details · Add more shoes