Hoka Cielo X1 3.0 vs Saucony Endorphin Elite 3
Two popular shoes in the same category, compared on measured geometry. Each cell carries a provenance badge; open a shoe for sources.
- Hoka Cielo X1 3.037/30 mm · toe rocker 43 % · heel bevel 12 %
- Saucony Endorphin Elite 340/32 mm · toe rocker 31 % · heel bevel 12 %
Which suits you
| If you want | Pick | Because |
|---|---|---|
| A smoother roll at toe-off | Hoka Cielo X1 3.0 | 42.9 vs 31 % toe rocker |
| More cushioning under the heel | Saucony Endorphin Elite 3 | 37 vs 39.5 mm heel stack |
| More under the forefoot | About the same | 30 vs 31.5 mm forefoot stack |
| A lower drop | Hoka Cielo X1 3.0 | 7 vs 8 mm drop |
| A stiffer, snappier forefoot | About the same | 46 vs 54 /100 stiffness |
| A firmer, more stable feel | Hoka Cielo X1 3.0 | 48 vs 0 /100 firmness |
| A wider base under the forefoot | Saucony Endorphin Elite 3 | 107.6 vs 116.2 mm forefoot base |
From the values below, with differences inside measurement noise shown as about the same. This describes the shoes, not what is right for your feet; comfort in the first few runs decides.
| Metric | Hoka Cielo X1 3.0 Racing · Road | Saucony Endorphin Elite 3 Racing · Road |
|---|---|---|
| Heel-to-toe drop | 7 mmStated | 8 mmStated |
| Heel stack | 37 mmMeasured | 39.5 mmStated |
| Forefoot stack | 30 mmMeasured | 31.5 mmStated |
| Weight | — | 207 gStated |
| Toe rocker | 43 %est. | 31 %est. |
| Rocker radius | 52 %est. | 33 %est. |
| Rocker rise angle | 29 degest. | 35 degest. |
| Rocker angle at toe | 57 degest. | 63 degest. |
| Toe tip over ground | 55 mm*est. | 44 mm*est. |
| Visible rocker lift onset | 68.7 %est. | 78 %est. |
| Toe spring (relative) | 23.9 %est. | 21.8 %est. |
| Heel bevel length | 12.2 %est. | 12.1 %*est. |
| Heel bevel height | 34 mm*est. | 26 mm*est. |
| Midsole width (forefoot) | 107.6 mmMeasured | 116.2 mmMeasured |
| Midsole width (heel) | 78.1 mmMeasured | 94.2 mmMeasured |
| Toe box shape | — | 80 %*est. |
| Interior forefoot width | 91.4 mmMeasured | 93.8 mmMeasured |
| Toebox width | 70.4 mmMeasured | 71.8 mmMeasured |
| Longitudinal stiffness | 46Derived | 54Derived |
| Midsole firmness | 48Derived | 0Derived |
| Plate | Carbon plate | Carbon plate |
| Primary foam | Dual-layer PEBA | IncrediRUN |
| List price | $275 | $290 |
Key differences
- Hoka Cielo X1 3.0's heel-to-toe drop is 7 mm, 1 mm lower than Saucony Endorphin Elite 3's 8 mm.
- Hoka Cielo X1 3.0's heel stack is 37 mm, 2.5 mm thinner than Saucony Endorphin Elite 3's 39.5 mm.
- Hoka Cielo X1 3.0's forefoot stack is 30 mm, 1.5 mm thinner than Saucony Endorphin Elite 3's 31.5 mm.
- Hoka Cielo X1 3.0's toe rocker is 43 % of length, 12 % of length longer than Saucony Endorphin Elite 3's 31 % of length.
Read more about both shoes
We measure the shape. For how they feel over many miles, and for lab tests of cushioning, grip and fit:
Saucony Endorphin Elite 3
- Believe in the Run · tester review
- RTINGS · lab test
- RunRepeat · lab test
Independent sites; we are not affiliated with them.
Hoka Cielo X1 3.0 details · Saucony Endorphin Elite 3 details · Add more shoes