Hoka Mach 7 vs Saucony Endorphin Azura
Two popular shoes in the same category, compared on measured geometry. Each cell carries a provenance badge; open a shoe for sources.
- Hoka Mach 737/32 mm · toe rocker 38 % · heel bevel 10 %
- Saucony Endorphin Azura40/32 mm · toe rocker 34 % · heel bevel 12 %
Which suits you
| If you want | Pick | Because |
|---|---|---|
| A smoother roll at toe-off | Hoka Mach 7 | 38 vs 33.7 % toe rocker |
| More cushioning under the heel | Saucony Endorphin Azura | 37 vs 40 mm heel stack |
| More under the forefoot | About the same | 32 vs 32 mm forefoot stack |
| A lower drop | Hoka Mach 7 | 5 vs 8 mm drop |
| A stiffer, snappier forefoot | Saucony Endorphin Azura | 33 vs 45 /100 stiffness |
| A firmer, more stable feel | About the same | 82 vs 76 /100 firmness |
| A wider base under the forefoot | Saucony Endorphin Azura | 115.5 vs 123.4 mm forefoot base |
From the values below, with differences inside measurement noise shown as about the same. This describes the shoes, not what is right for your feet; comfort in the first few runs decides.
| Metric | Hoka Mach 7 Daily trainer · Road | Saucony Endorphin Azura Daily trainer · Road |
|---|---|---|
| Heel-to-toe drop | 5 mmDerived | 8 mmStated |
| Heel stack | 37 mmStated | 40 mmStated |
| Forefoot stack | 32 mmStated | 32 mmStated |
| Weight | 241 gStated | 241 gStated |
| Toe rocker | 38 %est. | 34 %est. |
| Rocker radius | 45 %est. | 36 %est. |
| Rocker rise angle | 28 degest. | 32 degest. |
| Rocker angle at toe | 54 degest. | 64 degest. |
| Toe tip over ground | 48 mmest. | 45 mm*est. |
| Visible rocker lift onset | 73.8 %est. | 77.3 %est. |
| Toe spring (relative) | 20.1 %est. | 21.1 %est. |
| Heel bevel length | 9.7 %est. | 11.8 %*est. |
| Heel bevel height | 17 mmest. | 29 mm*est. |
| Midsole width (forefoot) | 115.5 mmMeasured | 123.4 mmMeasured |
| Midsole width (heel) | 93.3 mmMeasured | 91.6 mmMeasured |
| Interior forefoot width | 92.5 mmMeasured | 94 mmMeasured |
| Toebox width | 72.9 mmMeasured | 72.2 mmMeasured |
| Longitudinal stiffness | 33Derived | 45Derived |
| Midsole firmness | 82Derived | 76Derived |
| Plate | No plate | No plate |
| Primary foam | supercritical EVA | PWRRUN PB |
| List price | $145 | $150 |
Key differences
- Hoka Mach 7's heel-to-toe drop is 5 mm, 3 mm lower than Saucony Endorphin Azura's 8 mm.
- Hoka Mach 7's heel stack is 37 mm, 3 mm thinner than Saucony Endorphin Azura's 40 mm.
- Forefoot stack is about the same: 32 mm for Hoka Mach 7, 32 mm for Saucony Endorphin Azura.
- Weight is about the same: 241 g for Hoka Mach 7, 241 g for Saucony Endorphin Azura.
- Hoka Mach 7's toe rocker is 38 % of length, 4 % of length longer than Saucony Endorphin Azura's 34 % of length.
Read more about both shoes
We measure the shape. For how they feel over many miles, and for lab tests of cushioning, grip and fit:
Hoka Mach 7
- Believe in the Run · tester review
- RTINGS · lab test
- RunRepeat · lab test
Saucony Endorphin Azura
- Believe in the Run · tester review
- RTINGS · lab test
- RunRepeat · lab test
Independent sites; we are not affiliated with them.
Hoka Mach 7 details · Saucony Endorphin Azura details · Add more shoes