New Balance FuelCell SuperComp Elite v6 vs Saucony Endorphin Elite 3
Two shoes compared on measured geometry. Each cell carries a provenance badge; open a shoe for sources.
- New Balance FuelCell SuperComp Elite v640/32 mm · toe rocker 39 % · heel bevel 8 %
- Saucony Endorphin Elite 340/32 mm · toe rocker 31 % · heel bevel 12 %
Which suits you
| If you want | Pick | Because |
|---|---|---|
| A smoother roll at toe-off | New Balance FuelCell SuperComp Elite v6 | 38.5 vs 31 % toe rocker |
| More cushioning under the heel | About the same | 40 vs 39.5 mm heel stack |
| More under the forefoot | About the same | 32 vs 31.5 mm forefoot stack |
| A lower drop | About the same | 8 vs 8 mm drop |
| A stiffer, snappier forefoot | New Balance FuelCell SuperComp Elite v6 | 83 vs 54 /100 stiffness |
| A firmer, more stable feel | New Balance FuelCell SuperComp Elite v6 | 38 vs 0 /100 firmness |
| A wider base under the forefoot | About the same | 114.9 vs 116.2 mm forefoot base |
From the values below, with differences inside measurement noise shown as about the same. This describes the shoes, not what is right for your feet; comfort in the first few runs decides.
| Metric | New Balance FuelCell SuperComp Elite v6 Racing · Road | Saucony Endorphin Elite 3 Racing · Road |
|---|---|---|
| Heel-to-toe drop | 8 mmStated | 8 mmStated |
| Heel stack | 40 mmStated | 39.5 mmStated |
| Forefoot stack | 32 mmStated | 31.5 mmStated |
| Weight | 190 gStated | 207 gStated |
| Toe rocker | 39 %est. | 31 %est. |
| Rocker radius | 49 %est. | 33 %est. |
| Rocker rise angle | 30 degest. | 35 degest. |
| Rocker angle at toe | 64 degest. | 63 degest. |
| Toe tip over ground | 48 mm*est. | 44 mm*est. |
| Visible rocker lift onset | 70.8 %est. | 78 %est. |
| Toe spring (relative) | 22.3 %est. | 21.8 %est. |
| Heel bevel length | 8.4 %est. | 12.1 %*est. |
| Heel bevel height | 16 mm*est. | 26 mm*est. |
| Midsole width (forefoot) | 114.9 mmMeasured | 116.2 mmMeasured |
| Midsole width (heel) | 76.1 mmMeasured | 94.2 mmMeasured |
| Toe box shape | — | 80 %*est. |
| Interior forefoot width | 90.7 mmMeasured | 93.8 mmMeasured |
| Toebox width | 71.4 mmMeasured | 71.8 mmMeasured |
| Longitudinal stiffness | 83Derived | 54Derived |
| Midsole firmness | 38Derived | 0Derived |
| Plate | Carbon plate | Carbon plate |
| Primary foam | Infinion (supercritical TPEE) | IncrediRUN |
| List price | $275 | $290 |
Key differences
- Heel-to-toe drop is about the same: 8 mm for New Balance FuelCell SuperComp Elite v6, 8 mm for Saucony Endorphin Elite 3.
- Heel stack is about the same: 40 mm for New Balance FuelCell SuperComp Elite v6, 39.5 mm for Saucony Endorphin Elite 3.
- Forefoot stack is about the same: 32 mm for New Balance FuelCell SuperComp Elite v6, 31.5 mm for Saucony Endorphin Elite 3.
- New Balance FuelCell SuperComp Elite v6's weight is 190 g, 17 g lighter than Saucony Endorphin Elite 3's 207 g.
- New Balance FuelCell SuperComp Elite v6's toe rocker is 39 % of length, 8 % of length longer than Saucony Endorphin Elite 3's 31 % of length.
Read more about both shoes
We measure the shape. For how they feel over many miles, and for lab tests of cushioning, grip and fit:
Saucony Endorphin Elite 3
- Believe in the Run · tester review
- RTINGS · lab test
- RunRepeat · lab test
Independent sites; we are not affiliated with them.
New Balance FuelCell SuperComp Elite v6 details · Saucony Endorphin Elite 3 details · Add more shoes