ShoeGeometry

Brooks Cascadia Elite vs Topo Athletic Ultraventure 5

Two popular shoes in the same category, compared on measured geometry. Each cell carries a provenance badge; open a shoe for sources.

Image or embed
heel boneBrooks Cascadia Elite: heel 40 mm, forefoot 34 mm (drop 6 mm); toe rocker 38 % of length, radius 47 % of length; heel bevel 12 % of length, 19 mm high at the back, ending about under the heel bone.Brooks Cascadia Elite: toe rocker 38 % of lengthTopo Athletic Ultraventure 5: heel 35 mm, forefoot 30 mm (drop 5 mm); toe rocker 34 % of length, radius 44 % of length; heel bevel 11 % of length, 19 mm high at the back, ending about under the heel bone.Topo Athletic Ultraventure 5: toe rocker 34 % of length
  • Brooks Cascadia Elite40/34 mm · toe rocker 38 % · heel bevel 12 %
  • Topo Athletic Ultraventure 535/30 mm · toe rocker 34 % · heel bevel 11 %
Illustrative profiles, not photographs: drawn from published stack heights and photo estimates of the unloaded shoes on a common length (300 mm), heels aligned, toe to the left; dots mark where each toe rocker starts; the dotted vertical line is under the heel bone (12 % of length), so a heel curve reaching past it is a bevel in front of the heel bone. Dotted lines use typical values where a shoe has no measurement. Exact values are in the table below.

Which suits you

If you wantPickBecause
A smoother roll at toe-offBrooks Cascadia Elite38.1 vs 33.7 % toe rocker
More cushioning under the heelBrooks Cascadia Elite40 vs 35 mm heel stack
More under the forefootBrooks Cascadia Elite34 vs 30 mm forefoot stack
A lower dropTopo Athletic Ultraventure 56 vs 5 mm drop
Less weightBrooks Cascadia Elite266 vs 303 g

From the values below, with differences inside measurement noise shown as about the same. This describes the shoes, not what is right for your feet; comfort in the first few runs decides.

MetricBrooks Cascadia Elite
Trail · Trail
Topo Athletic Ultraventure 5
Trail · Trail
Heel-to-toe drop6 mmDerived5 mmDerived
Heel stack40 mmStated35 mmStated
Forefoot stack34 mmStated30 mmStated
Weight266 gStated303 gStated
Toe rocker38 %est.34 %est.
Rocker radius47 %est.44 %est.
Rocker rise angle28 degest.29 degest.
Rocker angle at toe59 degest.60 degest.
Toe tip over ground46 mmest.38 mmest.
Visible rocker lift onset73.9 %est.75.4 %est.
Toe spring (relative)20.8 %est.19 %est.
Heel bevel length12.4 %est.11.3 %est.
Heel bevel height19 mm*est.19 mm*est.
Midsole width (forefoot)116.9 mmMeasured—
Midsole width (heel)100.9 mmMeasured—
Toe box shape79 %est.—
Interior forefoot width92.6 mmMeasured—
Toebox width71.6 mmMeasured—
Longitudinal stiffness39Derived—
Midsole firmness23Derived—
PlateCarbon compositeNo plate
Primary foamDNA Gold (PEBA)ZipFoam
List price$275$155

Key differences

  • Brooks Cascadia Elite's heel-to-toe drop is 6 mm, 1 mm higher than Topo Athletic Ultraventure 5's 5 mm.
  • Brooks Cascadia Elite's heel stack is 40 mm, 5 mm thicker than Topo Athletic Ultraventure 5's 35 mm.
  • Brooks Cascadia Elite's forefoot stack is 34 mm, 4 mm thicker than Topo Athletic Ultraventure 5's 30 mm.
  • Brooks Cascadia Elite's weight is 266 g, 37 g lighter than Topo Athletic Ultraventure 5's 303 g.
  • Brooks Cascadia Elite's toe rocker is 38 % of length, 4 % of length longer than Topo Athletic Ultraventure 5's 34 % of length.

Read more about both shoes

We measure the shape. For how they feel over many miles, and for lab tests of cushioning, grip and fit:

Brooks Cascadia Elite

Topo Athletic Ultraventure 5

Independent sites; we are not affiliated with them.

Share or embed

Brooks Cascadia Elite vs Topo Athletic Ultraventure 5: side profile drawing and key numbers
Download image

Embed on your site, blog or forum

Image with a link back:

<a href="https://shoegeometry.com/compare/brooks-cascadia-elite-vs-topo-athletic-ultraventure-5"><img src="https://shoegeometry.com/compare/brooks-cascadia-elite-vs-topo-athletic-ultraventure-5/share.png" alt="Brooks Cascadia Elite vs Topo Athletic Ultraventure 5: running-shoe geometry (ShoeGeometry)" width="600" height="315" style="max-width:100%;height:auto"></a>

Live embed (updates when we measure more):

<iframe src="https://shoegeometry.com/embed/compare/brooks-cascadia-elite-vs-topo-athletic-ultraventure-5" title="Brooks Cascadia Elite vs Topo Athletic Ultraventure 5 (ShoeGeometry)" width="100%" height="580" style="border:0;max-width:640px" loading="lazy"></iframe> <p><a href="https://shoegeometry.com/compare/brooks-cascadia-elite-vs-topo-athletic-ultraventure-5">Brooks Cascadia Elite vs Topo Athletic Ultraventure 5</a>: running-shoe geometry from ShoeGeometry</p>

Free to use with the link back (CC BY 4.0). Lab measurements are credited to the lab that made them.

Brooks Cascadia Elite details · Topo Athletic Ultraventure 5 details · Add more shoes