ShoeGeometry

Mizuno Neo Accera

TrailTrailRock plate2026Men'sCurrent

At a glance

Heel-to-toe drop
8 mmStated
Stack, heel / forefoot
41 / 33 mmStated
Weight
286 gStatedUS M9
Plate
Rock plate
Toe rocker
36 % of lengthest.photos 33–66 %
Heel bevel
14.2 % of lengthest.rough estimate; photos 13–14 %
Stiffness / firmness
not measured yet
Primary foam
MIZUNO ENERZY NXT (nitrogen-infused supercritical EVA)

How it compares

  • Mizuno Neo Accera's heel-to-toe drop is 8 mm, higher than the catalogue median of 6 mm (59% of the 179 other current shoes are lower).
  • Mizuno Neo Accera's heel stack is 41 mm, thicker than the catalogue median of 38 mm (74% of the 176 other current shoes are thinner).
  • Mizuno Neo Accera's forefoot stack is 33 mm, thicker than the catalogue median of 31.5 mm (59% of the 171 other current shoes are thinner).
  • Mizuno Neo Accera's weight is 286 g, heavier than the catalogue median of 269 g (69% of the 167 other current shoes are lighter).
  • 4 shoes with similar geometry from other lines.

Differences smaller than the precision of the sources (about 1 mm of stack, 8 g, or the spread between photos for photo estimates) are reported as about the same.

Specifications

Heel-to-toe drop
Manufacturer stated
8mm
LowSpec listingbrand figure, reported by Believe in the Runsource
Heel stack
Manufacturer stated
41mm
LowSpec listingbrand figure, reported by Believe in the Runsource
Forefoot stack
Manufacturer stated
33mm
LowSpec listingbrand figure, reported by Believe in the Runsource
Weight
Manufacturer stated
286g
MediumSpec listingbrand figure, reported by Believe in the RunUS M9source
Plate
Rock plate
Primary foam
MIZUNO ENERZY NXT (nitrogen-infused supercritical EVA)
List price
$200

Geometry

Catalogue average: heel 38 mm, forefoot 32 mm, toe rocker 34 %Mizuno Neo Accera: heel 41 mm, forefoot 33 mm (drop 8 mm); toe rocker 36 % of length, radius 42 % of length; heel bevel 14 % of length, 28 mm high at the back, reaching in front of the heel bone (the sole still curves up under it: a heel rocker).41 mm33 mmUnder the centre of the heel bone: 12 % of length from the heel, where heel stack is measuredheel boneHeel contact: the sole is within 4.5 mm of the ground from 14 % of length (foam compresses more under load), reaching in front of the heel bone (the sole still curves up under it: a heel rocker)heel bevel 14 %Toe rocker: the front 36 % of the length curves up (the curve leaves the ground 64 % of length from the heel)toe rocker 36 %toeheel
Front: toe rocker shorter longerRear: heel stack lower higher not measured
Dashed: average of the catalogue
Illustrative profile, not a photograph or scan: drawn to scale for a 300 mm shoe from published stack heights and photo estimates of the unloaded shoe (under body weight the foam compresses and the curves flatten). The grey upper is a generic outline, not this shoe’s. Mizuno Neo Accera: heel 41 mm, forefoot 33 mm (drop 8 mm); toe rocker 36 % of length, radius 42 % of length; heel bevel 14 % of length, 28 mm high at the back, reaching in front of the heel bone (the sole still curves up under it: a heel rocker). Heel bone: 12 % of length from the heel, where heel stack is measured. Heel bevel and toe rocker are marked where each curve meets the ground; for the heel that is where the sole comes within 4.5 mm of the ground, which foam compression closes under body weight.

Percent values are relative to shoe length so they compare across images and sizes; widths in millimetres are lab measurements from the cited source, while toe tip and heel heights in millimetres are photo estimates converted for a men’s US 9 (assumed 300 mm long), so approximate. See how rocker geometry is defined.

Toe rocker
AI estimated
36%

4 photos range 33–66 %; shown is their median.

LowSide photosource
Rocker radius
AI estimated
42%

3 photos range 42–49 %; shown is one of the two that agree most closely.

LowSide photosource
Rocker rise angle
AI estimated
29deg

4 photos range 21–30 deg; shown is their median.

LowSide photosource
Toe tip over ground
AI estimated
38mm*

4 photos range 36–53 mm; shown is their median (* the photos disagree by more than usual).

LowSide photosource
Rocker angle at toe
AI estimated
67deg

4 photos range 63–67 deg; shown is one of the two that agree most closely.

LowSide photosource
Visible rocker lift onset
AI estimated
76.7%

4 photos range 39.5–79.1 %; shown is one of the two that agree most closely.

LowSide photosource
Toe spring (relative)
AI estimated
20.2%

4 photos range 18.3–26.1 %; shown is their median.

LowSide photosource
Heel bevel length
AI estimated
14.2%

4 photos range 13.1–14.3 %; shown is the average of the two that agree most closely.

LowSide photosource
Heel bevel height
AI estimated
28mm*

4 photos range 23–28 mm; shown is the average of the two that agree most closely (* the photos disagree by more than usual).

LowSide photosource
Toe box shape
AI estimated
74%

2 photos range 73–75 %; shown is the average of the two that agree most closely.

LowTop photosource
Wrong value? Missing data? Tell me
Stored only to improve the site; see privacy.

Sources

  • Mizuno Neo Accera Review: Tumbled Off The Trail | Believe in the RunreviewBelieve in the Runaccessed 2026-10-04open ↗
  • Mizuno Neo Accera Unisex Shoes Dawn Blue/Yello | Running WarehouseretailerRunning Warehouseaccessed 2026-10-04open ↗
  • mizuno-neo-accera lateral product photoimageRunning Warehouseaccessed 2026-10-04open ↗
  • mizuno-neo-accera medial product photoimageRunning Warehouseaccessed 2026-10-04open ↗
  • mizuno-neo-accera lateral product photoimageRunning Warehouseaccessed 2026-10-04open ↗
  • mizuno-neo-accera medial product photoimageRunning Warehouseaccessed 2026-10-04open ↗
  • mizuno-neo-accera sole product photoimageRunning Warehouseaccessed 2026-10-04open ↗
  • mizuno-neo-accera top product photoimageRunning Warehouseaccessed 2026-10-04open ↗
Technical detail: every recorded value, method and version (25)

All approved observations

Every recorded value, including superseded ones. The displayed value per metric is chosen by precedence (measured › stated › derived › AI estimated), then confidence, then recency. 58 further observations awaiting review.

MetricValueClassConfidenceMethodSourceRecorded
Heel-to-toe drop8 mmStatedLowSpec listingBelieve in the Run2026-10-04
Heel stack41 mmStatedLowSpec listingBelieve in the Run2026-10-04
Forefoot stack33 mmStatedLowSpec listingBelieve in the Run2026-10-04
Weight286 g (US M9)StatedMediumSpec listingBelieve in the Run2026-10-04
Weight281 gStatedMediumSpec listingRunning Warehouse2026-10-04
Rocker apex65.8 %est.LowSide photoRunning Warehouse2026-10-04
Rocker apex67.1 %est.LowSide photoRunning Warehouse2026-10-04
Rocker radius44 %est.LowSide photoRunning Warehouse2026-10-04
Rocker radius42 %est.LowSide photoRunning Warehouse2026-10-04
Rocker rise angle29 degest.LowSide photoRunning Warehouse2026-10-04
Rocker rise angle29 degest.LowSide photoRunning Warehouse2026-10-04
Toe tip over ground36 mmest.LowSide photoRunning Warehouse2026-10-04
Toe tip over ground36 mmest.LowSide photoRunning Warehouse2026-10-04
Rocker angle at toe67 degest.LowSide photoRunning Warehouse2026-10-04
Rocker angle at toe67 degest.LowSide photoRunning Warehouse2026-10-04
Visible rocker lift onset76.7 %est.LowSide photoRunning Warehouse2026-10-04
Visible rocker lift onset76.1 %est.LowSide photoRunning Warehouse2026-10-04
Toe spring (relative)19.6 %est.LowSide photoRunning Warehouse2026-10-04
Toe spring (relative)20.8 %est.LowSide photoRunning Warehouse2026-10-04
Heel bevel length14.3 %est.LowSide photoRunning Warehouse2026-10-04
Heel bevel length14.2 %est.LowSide photoRunning Warehouse2026-10-04
Heel bevel height28 mmest.LowSide photoRunning Warehouse2026-10-04
Heel bevel height28 mmest.LowSide photoRunning Warehouse2026-10-04
Toe box shape75 %est.LowTop photoRunning Warehouse2026-10-04
Toe box shape73 %est.LowTop photoRunning Warehouse2026-10-04

Classes: Manufacturer stated · Externally measured · AI estimated · Derived · User reported. Hover a method for its identifier and algorithm version.

Source notes

  • Running Warehouse: sha256=a2e631bc1ab5544fa18b3481b9cafff8f4a63589d130097fa2d5bf8034fc0a5e; 0.3
  • Running Warehouse: sha256=f8eefad1e4e47813759ead124880b991182ae82f40d94b7c93e6bfe20905cc5f; 0.3
  • Running Warehouse: sha256=599c4701a35373ea30a2cb50a47f8a47e41d7cb28bc9fc126f5ccc69517d48d4; 0.3
  • Running Warehouse: sha256=500c0d612901afbdca90f2752c2d16ad20e1b07fbc939f89eed2527587646f03; 0.3
  • Running Warehouse: sha256=de1b0c30cc22a7ec457da0bb3df0cd6f529b7344d830714108e156bcac1ca2b1; 0.1
  • Running Warehouse: sha256=0f094996b8941f06ed2c5f076f8c91bd80cd18bd99a239a2bea100f826763b7b; 0.1

Shoes with similar geometry

Compare these →

Closest current models from other lines by stack, drop, rocker, toe height, stiffness, firmness, weight and width, whichever both shoes have.

Side profile illustration of the Brooks Ghost Trail
Brooks
Ghost Trail
Road/trail hybrid · No plate
Drop
8 mm
Heel
40 mm
Toe rocker
34%

Very close on every shared measure

Side profile illustration of the Salomon Ultra Glide 4
Salomon
Ultra Glide 4
Trail · No plate
Drop
6 mm
Heel
41 mm
Toe rocker
36%

vs this shoe: 2 mm less drop

Side profile illustration of the Salomon S/Lab Ultra Glide 2
Salomon
S/Lab Ultra Glide 2
Trail · No plate
Drop
6 mm
Heel
41 mm
Toe rocker
—

vs this shoe: 2 mm less drop

Side profile illustration of the New Balance FuelCell SuperComp Trail v2
New Balance
FuelCell SuperComp Trail v2
Trail · Carbon plate
Drop
8 mm
Heel
39 mm
Toe rocker
38%

Very close on every shared measure