ASICS Novablast 6 vs Hoka Mach 7
Two popular shoes in the same category, compared on measured geometry. Each cell carries a provenance badge; open a shoe for sources.
- ASICS Novablast 642/34 mm · toe rocker 34 % · heel bevel 7 %
- Hoka Mach 737/32 mm · toe rocker 38 % · heel bevel 10 %
Which suits you
| If you want | Pick | Because |
|---|---|---|
| A smoother roll at toe-off | Hoka Mach 7 | 34.2 vs 38 % toe rocker |
| More cushioning under the heel | ASICS Novablast 6 | 41.5 vs 37 mm heel stack |
| More under the forefoot | About the same | 33.5 vs 32 mm forefoot stack |
| A lower drop | Hoka Mach 7 | 8 vs 5 mm drop |
| A stiffer, snappier forefoot | About the same | 39 vs 33 /100 stiffness |
| A firmer, more stable feel | Hoka Mach 7 | 56 vs 82 /100 firmness |
| A wider base under the forefoot | About the same | 115.2 vs 115.5 mm forefoot base |
From the values below, with differences inside measurement noise shown as about the same. This describes the shoes, not what is right for your feet; comfort in the first few runs decides.
| Metric | ASICS Novablast 6 Daily trainer · Road | Hoka Mach 7 Daily trainer · Road |
|---|---|---|
| Heel-to-toe drop | 8 mmStated | 5 mmDerived |
| Heel stack | 41.5 mmStated | 37 mmStated |
| Forefoot stack | 33.5 mmStated | 32 mmStated |
| Weight | 249 gStated | 241 gStated |
| Toe rocker | 34 %est. | 38 %est. |
| Rocker radius | 42 %est. | 45 %est. |
| Rocker rise angle | 29 degest. | 28 degest. |
| Rocker angle at toe | 56 degest. | 54 degest. |
| Toe tip over ground | 42 mmest. | 48 mmest. |
| Visible rocker lift onset | 74.1 %est. | 73.8 %est. |
| Toe spring (relative) | 18.9 %est. | 20.1 %est. |
| Heel bevel length | 7.5 %est. | 9.7 %est. |
| Heel bevel height | 20 mm*est. | 17 mmest. |
| Midsole width (forefoot) | 115.2 mmMeasured | 115.5 mmMeasured |
| Midsole width (heel) | 93.8 mmMeasured | 93.3 mmMeasured |
| Interior forefoot width | 94.8 mmMeasured | 92.5 mmMeasured |
| Toebox width | 71 mmMeasured | 72.9 mmMeasured |
| Longitudinal stiffness | 39Derived | 33Derived |
| Midsole firmness | 56Derived | 82Derived |
| Plate | No plate | No plate |
| Primary foam | FF Blast Max (FF Turbo Squared forefoot trampoline pod) | supercritical EVA |
| List price | $155 | $145 |
Key differences
- ASICS Novablast 6's heel-to-toe drop is 8 mm, 3 mm higher than Hoka Mach 7's 5 mm.
- ASICS Novablast 6's heel stack is 41.5 mm, 4.5 mm thicker than Hoka Mach 7's 37 mm.
- ASICS Novablast 6's forefoot stack is 33.5 mm, 1.5 mm thicker than Hoka Mach 7's 32 mm.
- ASICS Novablast 6's weight is 249 g, 8 g heavier than Hoka Mach 7's 241 g.
- ASICS Novablast 6's toe rocker is 34 % of length, 4 % of length shorter than Hoka Mach 7's 38 % of length.
Read more about both shoes
We measure the shape. For how they feel over many miles, and for lab tests of cushioning, grip and fit:
ASICS Novablast 6
- Believe in the Run · tester review
- RTINGS · lab test
- RunRepeat · lab test
Hoka Mach 7
- Believe in the Run · tester review
- RTINGS · lab test
- RunRepeat · lab test
Independent sites; we are not affiliated with them.
Share or embed
Embed on your site, blog or forum
Image with a link back:
<a href="https://shoegeometry.com/compare/asics-novablast-6-vs-hoka-mach-7"><img src="https://shoegeometry.com/compare/asics-novablast-6-vs-hoka-mach-7/share.png" alt="ASICS Novablast 6 vs Hoka Mach 7: running-shoe geometry (ShoeGeometry)" width="600" height="315" style="max-width:100%;height:auto"></a>
Live embed (updates when we measure more):
<iframe src="https://shoegeometry.com/embed/compare/asics-novablast-6-vs-hoka-mach-7" title="ASICS Novablast 6 vs Hoka Mach 7 (ShoeGeometry)" width="100%" height="580" style="border:0;max-width:640px" loading="lazy"></iframe> <p><a href="https://shoegeometry.com/compare/asics-novablast-6-vs-hoka-mach-7">ASICS Novablast 6 vs Hoka Mach 7</a>: running-shoe geometry from ShoeGeometry</p>
Free to use with the link back (CC BY 4.0). Lab measurements are credited to the lab that made them.
ASICS Novablast 6 details · Hoka Mach 7 details · Add more shoes
