ShoeGeometry

Adidas Terrex Agravic Speed 2

TrailTrailNo plate2026Men'sCurrent

At a glance

Heel-to-toe drop
8 mmStated
Stack, heel / forefoot
34 / 26 mmStated
Weight
238 gStatedsize 9
Plate
No plate
Toe rocker
40 % of lengthest.photos 39–40 %
Heel bevel
12.8 % of lengthest.photos 12–14 %
Stiffness / firmness
not measured yet
Primary foam
Lightstrike Pro (bottom) + Lightstrike (top)

How it compares

  • Adidas Terrex Agravic Speed 2's heel-to-toe drop is 8 mm, higher than the catalogue median of 6 mm (59% of the 179 other current shoes are lower).
  • Adidas Terrex Agravic Speed 2's heel stack is 34 mm, thinner than the catalogue median of 38 mm (18% of the 176 other current shoes are thinner).
  • Adidas Terrex Agravic Speed 2's forefoot stack is 26 mm, thinner than the catalogue median of 31.5 mm (11% of the 171 other current shoes are thinner).
  • Adidas Terrex Agravic Speed 2's weight is 238 g, lighter than the catalogue median of 269 g (21% of the 167 other current shoes are lighter).
  • 4 shoes with similar geometry from other lines.

Differences smaller than the precision of the sources (about 1 mm of stack, 8 g, or the spread between photos for photo estimates) are reported as about the same.

Specifications

Heel-to-toe drop
Manufacturer stated
8mm
MediumSpec listingbrand figure, reported by Doctors of Runningsource
Heel stack
Manufacturer stated
34mm
MediumSpec listingbrand figure, reported by Doctors of Runningsource
Forefoot stack
Manufacturer stated
26mm
MediumSpec listingbrand figure, reported by Doctors of Runningsource
Weight
Manufacturer stated
238g
MediumSpec listingbrand figure, reported by Doctors of Runningsize 9source
Plate
No plate
Primary foam
Lightstrike Pro (bottom) + Lightstrike (top)
List price
$165

Geometry

Catalogue average: heel 38 mm, forefoot 32 mm, toe rocker 35 %Adidas Terrex Agravic Speed 2: heel 34 mm, forefoot 26 mm (drop 8 mm); toe rocker 40 % of length, radius 60 % of length; heel bevel 13 % of length, 25 mm high at the back, ending about under the heel bone.34 mm26 mmUnder the centre of the heel bone: 12 % of length from the heel, where heel stack is measuredheel boneHeel contact: the sole is within 4.5 mm of the ground from 13 % of length (foam compresses more under load), ending about under the heel boneheel bevel 13 %Toe rocker: the front 40 % of the length curves up (the curve leaves the ground 60 % of length from the heel)toe rocker 40 %toeheel
Front: toe rocker shorter longerRear: heel stack lower higher not measured
Dashed: average of the catalogue
Illustrative profile, not a photograph or scan: drawn to scale for a 300 mm shoe from published stack heights and photo estimates of the unloaded shoe (under body weight the foam compresses and the curves flatten). The grey upper is a generic outline, not this shoe’s. Adidas Terrex Agravic Speed 2: heel 34 mm, forefoot 26 mm (drop 8 mm); toe rocker 40 % of length, radius 60 % of length; heel bevel 13 % of length, 25 mm high at the back, ending about under the heel bone. Heel bone: 12 % of length from the heel, where heel stack is measured. Heel bevel and toe rocker are marked where each curve meets the ground; for the heel that is where the sole comes within 4.5 mm of the ground, which foam compression closes under body weight.

Percent values are relative to shoe length so they compare across images and sizes; widths in millimetres are lab measurements from the cited source, while toe tip and heel heights in millimetres are photo estimates converted for a men’s US 9 (assumed 300 mm long), so approximate. See how rocker geometry is defined.

Toe rocker
AI estimated
40%

2 photos range 39–40 %; shown is one of the two that agree most closely.

LowSide photosource
Rocker radius
AI estimated
60%

2 photos range 54–60 %; shown is one of the two that agree most closely.

LowSide photosource
Rocker rise angle
AI estimated
22deg

2 photos range 22–24 deg; shown is one of the two that agree most closely.

LowSide photosource
Toe tip over ground
AI estimated
39mm*

2 photos range 37–42 mm; shown is the average of the two that agree most closely (* the photos disagree by more than usual).

LowSide photosource
Rocker angle at toe
AI estimated
47deg

2 photos range 47–51 deg; shown is one of the two that agree most closely.

LowSide photosource
Visible rocker lift onset
AI estimated
74.7%

2 photos range 74.5–74.7 %; shown is one of the two that agree most closely.

LowSide photosource
Toe spring (relative)
AI estimated
16.1%

2 photos range 16.1–17.9 %; shown is one of the two that agree most closely.

LowSide photosource
Heel bevel length
AI estimated
12.8%

2 photos range 12–13.7 %; shown is the average of the two that agree most closely.

LowSide photosource
Heel bevel height
AI estimated
25mm

2 photos range 24–27 mm; shown is the average of the two that agree most closely.

LowSide photosource
Toe box shape
AI estimated
70%

2 photos range 70–70 %; shown is the average of the two that agree most closely.

LowTop photosource

How it compares

Appears in:Longer toe rocker

Compare:Adidas Terrex Agravic Speed 2 vs Salomon Genesis 2Adidas Terrex Agravic Speed 2 vs ASICS Trabuco 14

Wrong value? Missing data? Tell me
Stored only to improve the site; see privacy.

Sources

  • Adidas Terrex Agravic Speed 2: Quick Evaluation - Doctors of RunningreviewDoctors of Runningaccessed 2026-10-04open ↗
  • Adidas Terrex Agravic Speed 2 Review: Less, But Actually More | Believe in the RunreviewBelieve in the Runaccessed 2026-10-04open ↗
  • adidas Terrex Agravic Speed 2 Men's Shoes Blue/Grey/Lim | Running WarehouseretailerRunning Warehouseaccessed 2026-10-04open ↗
  • adidas-terrex-agravic-speed-2 lateral product photoimageRunning Warehouseaccessed 2026-10-04open ↗
  • adidas-terrex-agravic-speed-2 medial product photoimageRunning Warehouseaccessed 2026-10-04open ↗
  • adidas-terrex-agravic-speed-2 sole product photoimageRunning Warehouseaccessed 2026-10-04open ↗
  • adidas-terrex-agravic-speed-2 top product photoimageRunning Warehouseaccessed 2026-10-04open ↗
Technical detail: every recorded value, method and version (32)

All approved observations

Every recorded value, including superseded ones. The displayed value per metric is chosen by precedence (measured › stated › derived › AI estimated), then confidence, then recency. 22 further observations awaiting review.

MetricValueClassConfidenceMethodSourceRecorded
Heel-to-toe drop8 mmStatedMediumSpec listingDoctors of Running2026-10-04
Heel-to-toe drop8.5 mmStatedMediumSpec listingBelieve in the Run2026-10-04
Heel-to-toe drop8 mmStatedMediumSpec listingBelieve in the Run2026-10-04
Heel stack34 mmStatedMediumSpec listingRunning Warehouse2026-10-04
Heel stack34 mmStatedMediumSpec listingDoctors of Running2026-10-04
Heel stack35 mmStatedMediumSpec listingBelieve in the Run2026-10-04
Forefoot stack26 mmStatedMediumSpec listingDoctors of Running2026-10-04
Forefoot stack27 mmStatedMediumSpec listingBelieve in the Run2026-10-04
Forefoot stack26 mmStatedMediumSpec listingRunning Warehouse2026-10-04
Weight238 g (size 9)StatedMediumSpec listingDoctors of Running2026-10-04
Weight238 gStatedMediumSpec listingRunning Warehouse2026-10-04
Weight230 g (US M9)StatedMediumSpec listingBelieve in the Run2026-10-04
Rocker apex60.7 %est.LowSide photoRunning Warehouse2026-10-04
Rocker apex60.2 %est.LowSide photoRunning Warehouse2026-10-04
Rocker radius60 %est.LowSide photoRunning Warehouse2026-10-04
Rocker radius54 %est.LowSide photoRunning Warehouse2026-10-04
Rocker rise angle22 degest.LowSide photoRunning Warehouse2026-10-04
Rocker rise angle24 degest.LowSide photoRunning Warehouse2026-10-04
Toe tip over ground37 mmest.LowSide photoRunning Warehouse2026-10-04
Rocker angle at toe51 degest.LowSide photoRunning Warehouse2026-10-04
Rocker angle at toe47 degest.LowSide photoRunning Warehouse2026-10-04
Toe tip over ground42 mmest.LowSide photoRunning Warehouse2026-10-04
Visible rocker lift onset74.5 %est.LowSide photoRunning Warehouse2026-10-04
Visible rocker lift onset74.7 %est.LowSide photoRunning Warehouse2026-10-04
Toe spring (relative)17.9 %est.LowSide photoRunning Warehouse2026-10-04
Toe spring (relative)16.1 %est.LowSide photoRunning Warehouse2026-10-04
Heel bevel length12 %est.LowSide photoRunning Warehouse2026-10-04
Heel bevel length13.7 %est.LowSide photoRunning Warehouse2026-10-04
Heel bevel height24 mmest.LowSide photoRunning Warehouse2026-10-04
Heel bevel height27 mmest.LowSide photoRunning Warehouse2026-10-04
Toe box shape70 %est.LowTop photoRunning Warehouse2026-10-04
Toe box shape70 %est.LowTop photoRunning Warehouse2026-10-04

Classes: Manufacturer stated · Externally measured · AI estimated · Derived · User reported. Hover a method for its identifier and algorithm version.

Source notes

  • Running Warehouse: sha256=54200220c5b01dc4f8d3449d4c0a235225010d48516bcc978db043c24106a030; 0.3
  • Running Warehouse: sha256=6e1601dc1f8346efd151185fdda77159471db1868b263722bdffef04e5490c4c; 0.3
  • Running Warehouse: sha256=f0049635c29603289eadf533c165d89921ddf6dcc14cf6132e38ffc9852cc808; 0.1
  • Running Warehouse: sha256=c0276f06f200f3bdcc0f42c0d443c0b28b53a5c8afa24f3c950935d678e81a09; 0.1

Shoes with similar geometry

Compare these →

Closest current models from other lines by stack, drop, rocker, toe height, stiffness, firmness, weight and width, whichever both shoes have.

Side profile illustration of the Salomon S/Lab Pulsar 4
Salomon
S/Lab Pulsar 4
Trail · No plate
Drop
6 mm
Heel
34 mm
Toe rocker
40%

vs this shoe: 2 mm less drop

Side profile illustration of the VJ FZN Aerofly
VJ
FZN Aerofly
Road/trail hybrid · Rock plate
Drop
8 mm
Heel
38 mm
Toe rocker
—

vs this shoe: 4 mm higher heel

Side profile illustration of the Salomon Genesis 2
Salomon
Genesis 2
Trail · No plate
Drop
8 mm
Heel
34 mm
Toe rocker
38%

Very close on every shared measure

Side profile illustration of the VJ FZN Tempo
VJ
FZN Tempo
Road/trail hybrid · Rock plate
Drop
6 mm
Heel
34 mm
Toe rocker
39%

vs this shoe: 2 mm less drop