Salomon Pulsar
At a glance
- Heel-to-toe drop
- 6 mmDerived
- Stack, heel / forefoot
- 29 / 23 mmStated
- Weight
- 290 gStated
- Plate
- No plate
- Toe rocker
- 32 % of lengthest.photos 31–35 %
- Heel bevel
- 13.8 % of lengthest.rough estimate; photos 13–15 %
- Stiffness / firmness
- not measured yet
- Primary foam
- optiFOAM2 (supercritical eTPU, 'Energy Foam Evo')
How it compares
- Salomon Pulsar's heel-to-toe drop is 6 mm, about the catalogue median of 6 mm (25% of the 179 other current shoes are lower).
- Salomon Pulsar's heel stack is 29 mm, thinner than the catalogue median of 38 mm (6% of the 176 other current shoes are thinner).
- Salomon Pulsar's forefoot stack is 23 mm, thinner than the catalogue median of 31.5 mm (4% of the 171 other current shoes are thinner).
- Salomon Pulsar's weight is 290 g, heavier than the catalogue median of 269 g (74% of the 167 other current shoes are lighter).
- 4 shoes with similar geometry from other lines.
Differences smaller than the precision of the sources (about 1 mm of stack, 8 g, or the spread between photos for photo estimates) are reported as about the same.
Specifications
- Heel-to-toe drop Derived
- 6mmMediumCalculated
- Heel stack Manufacturer stated
- 29mm
- Forefoot stack Manufacturer stated
- 23mm
- Weight Manufacturer stated
- 290g
- Plate
- No plate
- Primary foam
- optiFOAM2 (supercritical eTPU, 'Energy Foam Evo')
- List price
- $140
Plate, foam and price from PULSAR Trail running shoes · Men | Salomon.
Geometry
Percent values are relative to shoe length so they compare across images and sizes; widths in millimetres are lab measurements from the cited source, while toe tip and heel heights in millimetres are photo estimates converted for a men’s US 9 (assumed 300 mm long), so approximate. See how rocker geometry is defined.
- Toe rocker AI estimated
- 32%
4 photos range 31–35 %; shown is their median.
- Rocker radius AI estimated
- 44%
4 photos range 39–53 %; shown is one of the two that agree most closely.
- Rocker rise angle AI estimated
- 26deg
4 photos range 24–29 deg; shown is their median.
- Toe tip over ground AI estimated
- 34mm
4 photos range 33–35 mm; shown is their median.
- Rocker angle at toe AI estimated
- 50deg
4 photos range 46–57 deg; shown is one of the two that agree most closely.
- Visible rocker lift onset AI estimated
- 77.4%
4 photos range 76.1–77.4 %; shown is one of the two that agree most closely.
- Toe spring (relative) AI estimated
- 15.8%
4 photos range 15.3–16.8 %; shown is their median.
- Heel bevel length AI estimated
- 13.8%
4 photos range 13.4–14.7 %; shown is the average of the two that agree most closely.
- Heel bevel height AI estimated
- 19mm*
4 photos range 19–24 mm; shown is the average of the two that agree most closely (* the photos disagree by more than usual).
Wrong value? Missing data? Tell me
Sources
- Salomon Pulsar Review – iRunFarreviewiRunFaraccessed 2026-10-04open ↗
- Salomon Pulsar Review: All Terrain, All Day | Believe in the RunreviewBelieve in the Runaccessed 2026-10-04open ↗
- PULSAR Trail running shoes · Men | Salomonmanufacturersalomon.comaccessed 2026-10-04open ↗
- salomon-pulsar lateral product photoimageZapposaccessed 2026-10-04open ↗
- salomon-pulsar lateral product photoimageZapposaccessed 2026-10-04open ↗
- salomon-pulsar lateral product photoimageZapposaccessed 2026-10-04open ↗
- salomon-pulsar lateral product photoimageZapposaccessed 2026-10-04open ↗
Technical detail: every recorded value, method and version (28)
All approved observations
Every recorded value, including superseded ones. The displayed value per metric is chosen by precedence (measured › stated › derived › AI estimated), then confidence, then recency. 54 further observations awaiting review.
| Metric | Value | Class | Confidence | Method | Source | Recorded |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Heel-to-toe drop | 6 mm | Derived | Medium | Calculated | — | 2026-10-04 |
| Heel stack | 30 mm | Stated | Medium | Spec listing | iRunFar | 2026-10-04 |
| Heel stack | 30 mm | Stated | Medium | Spec listing | Believe in the Run | 2026-10-04 |
| Heel stack | 29 mm | Stated | High | Spec listing | salomon.com | 2026-10-04 |
| Forefoot stack | 24 mm | Stated | Medium | Spec listing | Believe in the Run | 2026-10-04 |
| Forefoot stack | 23 mm | Stated | High | Spec listing | salomon.com | 2026-10-04 |
| Forefoot stack | 24 mm | Stated | Medium | Spec listing | iRunFar | 2026-10-04 |
| Weight | 290 g | Stated | Medium | Spec listing | iRunFar | 2026-10-04 |
| Weight | 289 g | Stated | Medium | Spec listing | iRunFar | 2026-10-04 |
| Weight | 289 g (US M9) | Stated | Medium | Spec listing | Believe in the Run | 2026-10-04 |
| Rocker apex | 67.5 % | est. | Low | Side photo | Zappos | 2026-10-04 |
| Rocker apex | 67.7 % | est. | Low | Side photo | Zappos | 2026-10-04 |
| Rocker radius | 44 % | est. | Low | Side photo | Zappos | 2026-10-04 |
| Rocker radius | 46 % | est. | Low | Side photo | Zappos | 2026-10-04 |
| Rocker rise angle | 26 deg | est. | Low | Side photo | Zappos | 2026-10-04 |
| Rocker rise angle | 26 deg | est. | Low | Side photo | Zappos | 2026-10-04 |
| Toe tip over ground | 35 mm | est. | Low | Side photo | Zappos | 2026-10-04 |
| Rocker angle at toe | 50 deg | est. | Low | Side photo | Zappos | 2026-10-04 |
| Rocker angle at toe | 50 deg | est. | Low | Side photo | Zappos | 2026-10-04 |
| Toe tip over ground | 35 mm | est. | Low | Side photo | Zappos | 2026-10-04 |
| Visible rocker lift onset | 77.4 % | est. | Low | Side photo | Zappos | 2026-10-04 |
| Visible rocker lift onset | 77.2 % | est. | Low | Side photo | Zappos | 2026-10-04 |
| Toe spring (relative) | 15.9 % | est. | Low | Side photo | Zappos | 2026-10-04 |
| Toe spring (relative) | 15.7 % | est. | Low | Side photo | Zappos | 2026-10-04 |
| Heel bevel length | 13.8 % | est. | Low | Side photo | Zappos | 2026-10-04 |
| Heel bevel length | 13.8 % | est. | Medium | Side photo | Zappos | 2026-10-04 |
| Heel bevel height | 19 mm | est. | Medium | Side photo | Zappos | 2026-10-04 |
| Heel bevel height | 19 mm | est. | Low | Side photo | Zappos | 2026-10-04 |
Classes: Manufacturer stated · Externally measured · AI estimated · Derived · User reported. Hover a method for its identifier and algorithm version.
Source notes
- Zappos: sha256=02bda8b64a63eb728df7081bd81fcaa059e068f12f8663adc4d990ec9b585cec; 0.3
- Zappos: sha256=65e6e933278ef9180c1c151ffd6c595ae41759d81aa022096ad51850295778c8; 0.3
- Zappos: sha256=b8091fdd44da9c4e34470926e140dabe3803e15984ba68a64c09aeba2a010dff; 0.3
- Zappos: sha256=0c63149b1f8384ca73158938ed1feabef23ea4abe55d8515edcb07d9cd694381; 0.3
Shoes with similar geometry
Compare these →Closest current models from other lines by stack, drop, rocker, toe height, stiffness, firmness, weight and width, whichever both shoes have.
- Drop
- 6 mm
- Heel
- 28 mm
- Toe rocker
- 33%
Very close on every shared measure
- Drop
- 4 mm
- Heel
- 33 mm
- Toe rocker
- 34%
vs this shoe: 4 mm higher heel · 2 mm less drop
- Drop
- 6 mm
- Heel
- 33 mm
- Toe rocker
- 35%
vs this shoe: 4 mm higher heel
- Drop
- 6 mm
- Heel
- 34 mm
- Toe rocker
- 32%
vs this shoe: 5 mm higher heel · 25 g lighter