ShoeGeometry

Altra Timp 6

TrailTrailNo plate2026Men'sCurrent

At a glance

Heel-to-toe drop
0 mmDerived
Stack, heel / forefoot
30 / 30 mmStated
Weight
324 gStated
Plate
No plate
Toe rocker
31 % of lengthest.photos 30–34 %
Heel bevel
8.6 % of lengthest.rough estimate; photos 6–9 %
Stiffness / firmness
26 / 63 of 100Derived
Primary foam
Altra EGO MAX

How it compares

  • Altra Timp 6's heel-to-toe drop is 0 mm, lower than the catalogue median of 6 mm (0% of the 179 other current shoes are lower).
  • Altra Timp 6's heel stack is 30 mm, thinner than the catalogue median of 38 mm (9% of the 176 other current shoes are thinner).
  • Altra Timp 6's forefoot stack is 30 mm, thinner than the catalogue median of 31.5 mm (33% of the 171 other current shoes are thinner).
  • Altra Timp 6's weight is 324 g, heavier than the catalogue median of 269 g (96% of the 167 other current shoes are lighter).
  • 4 shoes with similar geometry from other lines.

Differences smaller than the precision of the sources (about 1 mm of stack, 8 g, or the spread between photos for photo estimates) are reported as about the same.

Specifications

Heel-to-toe drop
Derived
0mm
MediumCalculated
Heel stack
Manufacturer stated
30mm
MediumSpec listingbrand figure, reported by Running Warehousesource
Forefoot stack
Manufacturer stated
30mm
MediumSpec listingbrand figure, reported by Running Warehousesource
Weight
Manufacturer stated
324g
LowSpec listingbrand figure, reported by iRunFarsource
Plate
No plate
Primary foam
Altra EGO MAX
List price
$165

Geometry

Catalogue average: heel 38 mm, forefoot 32 mm, toe rocker 35 %Altra Timp 6: heel 30 mm, forefoot 30 mm (drop 0 mm); toe rocker 31 % of length, radius 44 % of length; heel bevel 9 % of length, 11 mm high at the back, ending behind the heel bone (only the back edge is rounded).30 mm30 mmUnder the centre of the heel bone: 12 % of length from the heel, where heel stack is measuredheel boneHeel contact: the sole is within 4.5 mm of the ground from 9 % of length (foam compresses more under load), ending behind the heel bone (only the back edge is rounded)heel bevel 9 %Toe rocker: the front 31 % of the length curves up (the curve leaves the ground 69 % of length from the heel)toe rocker 31 %toeheel
Front: toe rocker shorter longerRear: heel stack lower higher not measured
Dashed: average of the catalogue
Illustrative profile, not a photograph or scan: drawn to scale for a 300 mm shoe from published stack heights and photo estimates of the unloaded shoe (under body weight the foam compresses and the curves flatten). The grey upper is a generic outline, not this shoe’s. Altra Timp 6: heel 30 mm, forefoot 30 mm (drop 0 mm); toe rocker 31 % of length, radius 44 % of length; heel bevel 9 % of length, 11 mm high at the back, ending behind the heel bone (only the back edge is rounded). Heel bone: 12 % of length from the heel, where heel stack is measured. Heel bevel and toe rocker are marked where each curve meets the ground; for the heel that is where the sole comes within 4.5 mm of the ground, which foam compression closes under body weight.

Percent values are relative to shoe length so they compare across images and sizes; widths in millimetres are lab measurements from the cited source, while toe tip and heel heights in millimetres are photo estimates converted for a men’s US 9 (assumed 300 mm long), so approximate. See how rocker geometry is defined.

Toe rocker
AI estimated
31%

4 photos range 30–34 %; shown is their median.

LowSide photosource
Rocker radius
AI estimated
44%

4 photos range 36–44 %; shown is one of the two that agree most closely.

LowSide photosource
Rocker rise angle
AI estimated
29deg

4 photos range 26–31 deg; shown is their median.

LowSide photosource
Toe tip over ground
AI estimated
34mm

4 photos range 32–35 mm; shown is their median.

LowSide photosource
Rocker angle at toe
AI estimated
66deg

4 photos range 58–66 deg; shown is one of the two that agree most closely.

LowSide photosource
Visible rocker lift onset
AI estimated
77.7%

4 photos range 76.7–77.9 %; shown is one of the two that agree most closely.

LowSide photosource
Toe spring (relative)
AI estimated
17.4%

4 photos range 16.8–18.4 %; shown is their median.

LowSide photosource
Heel bevel length
AI estimated
8.6%

4 photos range 5.9–8.7 %; shown is the average of the two that agree most closely.

LowSide photosource
Heel bevel height
AI estimated
11mm

4 photos range 9–12 mm; shown is the average of the two that agree most closely.

LowSide photosource
Midsole width (forefoot)
Externally measured
113.9mm
MediumLab testsource
Midsole width (heel)
Externally measured
84.4mm
MediumLab testsource
Toe box shape
AI estimated
82%

2 photos range 82–83 %; shown is the average of the two that agree most closely.

LowTop photosource
Interior forefoot width
Externally measured
99.2mm
MediumLab testsource
Toebox width
Externally measured
81.9mm
MediumLab testsource

Stiffness

Longitudinal stiffness
Derived
26/ 100

Lab reading: 13.0 N, force to bend the shoe 30° (lab bending test); the score is our 0–100 rescaling of it.

MediumLab flex testsource
Midsole firmness
Derived
63/ 100

Lab reading: 36.8 Asker C, midsole durometer reading (higher = firmer); the score is our 0–100 rescaling of it.

MediumLab durometersource

How it compares

Appears in:Zero dropLow drop

Compare:Altra Timp 6 vs Topo Athletic Pursuit 3Altra Timp 6 vs Icebug Acceleritas 9 RB9X

Wrong value? Missing data? Tell me
Stored only to improve the site; see privacy.

Sources

  • Altra Timp 6 Men's Shoes Black/Orange | Running WarehouseretailerRunning Warehouseaccessed 2026-10-04open ↗
  • Altra Timp 6 Review – iRunFarreviewiRunFaraccessed 2026-10-04open ↗
  • altra-timp-6 lateral product photoimageRunning Warehouseaccessed 2026-10-04open ↗
  • altra-timp-6 lateral product photoimageRunning Warehouseaccessed 2026-10-04open ↗
  • altra-timp-6 medial product photoimageRunning Warehouseaccessed 2026-10-04open ↗
  • altra-timp-6 medial product photoimageRunning Warehouseaccessed 2026-10-04open ↗
  • Cut in half: Altra Timp 6 Review (2026) | RunRepeatlabRunRepeataccessed 2026-10-04open ↗
  • altra-timp-6 sole product photoimageRunning Warehouseaccessed 2026-10-04open ↗
  • altra-timp-6 top product photoimageRunning Warehouseaccessed 2026-10-04open ↗
Technical detail: every recorded value, method and version (31)

All approved observations

Every recorded value, including superseded ones. The displayed value per metric is chosen by precedence (measured › stated › derived › AI estimated), then confidence, then recency. 59 further observations awaiting review.

MetricValueClassConfidenceMethodSourceRecorded
Heel-to-toe drop0 mmDerivedMediumCalculated—2026-10-04
Heel stack30 mmStatedMediumSpec listingRunning Warehouse2026-10-04
Forefoot stack30 mmStatedMediumSpec listingRunning Warehouse2026-10-04
Weight323 gStatedLowSpec listingiRunFar2026-10-04
Weight324 gStatedLowSpec listingiRunFar2026-10-04
Rocker apex70.4 %est.LowSide photoRunning Warehouse2026-10-04
Rocker apex69.8 %est.LowSide photoRunning Warehouse2026-10-04
Rocker radius44 %est.LowSide photoRunning Warehouse2026-10-04
Rocker radius43 %est.LowSide photoRunning Warehouse2026-10-04
Rocker rise angle31 degest.LowSide photoRunning Warehouse2026-10-04
Rocker rise angle31 degest.LowSide photoRunning Warehouse2026-10-04
Rocker angle at toe66 degest.LowSide photoRunning Warehouse2026-10-04
Toe tip over ground35 mmest.LowSide photoRunning Warehouse2026-10-04
Toe tip over ground35 mmest.LowSide photoRunning Warehouse2026-10-04
Rocker angle at toe65 degest.LowSide photoRunning Warehouse2026-10-04
Visible rocker lift onset77.7 %est.LowSide photoRunning Warehouse2026-10-04
Visible rocker lift onset77.9 %est.LowSide photoRunning Warehouse2026-10-04
Toe spring (relative)16.8 %est.LowSide photoRunning Warehouse2026-10-04
Toe spring (relative)16.8 %est.LowSide photoRunning Warehouse2026-10-04
Heel bevel length8.5 %est.LowSide photoRunning Warehouse2026-10-04
Heel bevel length8.7 %est.LowSide photoRunning Warehouse2026-10-04
Heel bevel height11 mmest.LowSide photoRunning Warehouse2026-10-04
Heel bevel height11 mmest.LowSide photoRunning Warehouse2026-10-04
Midsole width (forefoot)113.9 mmMeasuredMediumLab testRunRepeat2026-10-04
Midsole width (heel)84.4 mmMeasuredMediumLab testRunRepeat2026-10-04
Toe box shape83 %est.LowTop photoRunning Warehouse2026-10-04
Toe box shape82 %est.LowTop photoRunning Warehouse2026-10-04
Interior forefoot width99.2 mmMeasuredMediumLab testRunRepeat2026-10-04
Toebox width81.9 mmMeasuredMediumLab testRunRepeat2026-10-04
Longitudinal stiffness26 DerivedMediumLab flex testRunRepeat2026-10-04
Midsole firmness63 DerivedMediumLab durometerRunRepeat2026-10-04

Classes: Manufacturer stated · Externally measured · AI estimated · Derived · User reported. Hover a method for its identifier and algorithm version.

Source notes

  • Running Warehouse: sha256=9cb8e73ded91e91a196753bc711b204cb4de8f204f7620de565c302c2deac4c7; 0.3
  • Running Warehouse: sha256=7fe13a39692dd99b220b0f1da594eefcbf3130681a3e05fe08dfaeb7eefa06a0; 0.3
  • Running Warehouse: sha256=30f2bd0fce8ecb85edb646ba92abc4bf67b947cf518770257acd3dc3c145305e; 0.3
  • Running Warehouse: sha256=8097a89d8a4338a197820398d0cbc26c9d6bc71b46420a7ec0658c7cb1b5d525; 0.3
  • Running Warehouse: sha256=693518311d18d59d50b4da29fa123deb89cfc78fc5ade9f4faa4cb6455024d42; 0.1
  • Running Warehouse: sha256=1e4a07fe3317017ab1e557d9c9e5a89cb6de1a62fc3ce79a0ba00e88d265564e; 0.1
Compare these →

Closest current models from other lines by stack, drop, rocker, toe height, stiffness, firmness, weight and width, whichever both shoes have.