Altra Timp 6
At a glance
- Heel-to-toe drop
- 0 mmDerived
- Stack, heel / forefoot
- 30 / 30 mmStated
- Weight
- 324 gStated
- Plate
- No plate
- Toe rocker
- 31 % of lengthest.photos 30–34 %
- Heel bevel
- 8.6 % of lengthest.rough estimate; photos 6–9 %
- Stiffness / firmness
- 26 / 63 of 100Derived
- Primary foam
- Altra EGO MAX
How it compares
- Altra Timp 6's heel-to-toe drop is 0 mm, lower than the catalogue median of 6 mm (0% of the 179 other current shoes are lower).
- Altra Timp 6's heel stack is 30 mm, thinner than the catalogue median of 38 mm (9% of the 176 other current shoes are thinner).
- Altra Timp 6's forefoot stack is 30 mm, thinner than the catalogue median of 31.5 mm (33% of the 171 other current shoes are thinner).
- Altra Timp 6's weight is 324 g, heavier than the catalogue median of 269 g (96% of the 167 other current shoes are lighter).
- 4 shoes with similar geometry from other lines.
Differences smaller than the precision of the sources (about 1 mm of stack, 8 g, or the spread between photos for photo estimates) are reported as about the same.
Specifications
- Heel-to-toe drop Derived
- 0mmMediumCalculated
- Heel stack Manufacturer stated
- 30mm
- Forefoot stack Manufacturer stated
- 30mm
- Weight Manufacturer stated
- 324g
- Plate
- No plate
- Primary foam
- Altra EGO MAX
- List price
- $165
Geometry
Percent values are relative to shoe length so they compare across images and sizes; widths in millimetres are lab measurements from the cited source, while toe tip and heel heights in millimetres are photo estimates converted for a men’s US 9 (assumed 300 mm long), so approximate. See how rocker geometry is defined.
- Toe rocker AI estimated
- 31%
4 photos range 30–34 %; shown is their median.
- Rocker radius AI estimated
- 44%
4 photos range 36–44 %; shown is one of the two that agree most closely.
- Rocker rise angle AI estimated
- 29deg
4 photos range 26–31 deg; shown is their median.
- Toe tip over ground AI estimated
- 34mm
4 photos range 32–35 mm; shown is their median.
- Rocker angle at toe AI estimated
- 66deg
4 photos range 58–66 deg; shown is one of the two that agree most closely.
- Visible rocker lift onset AI estimated
- 77.7%
4 photos range 76.7–77.9 %; shown is one of the two that agree most closely.
- Toe spring (relative) AI estimated
- 17.4%
4 photos range 16.8–18.4 %; shown is their median.
- Heel bevel length AI estimated
- 8.6%
4 photos range 5.9–8.7 %; shown is the average of the two that agree most closely.
- Heel bevel height AI estimated
- 11mm
4 photos range 9–12 mm; shown is the average of the two that agree most closely.
- Midsole width (forefoot) Externally measured
- 113.9mm
- Midsole width (heel) Externally measured
- 84.4mm
- Toe box shape AI estimated
- 82%
2 photos range 82–83 %; shown is the average of the two that agree most closely.
- Interior forefoot width Externally measured
- 99.2mm
- Toebox width Externally measured
- 81.9mm
Stiffness
- Longitudinal stiffness Derived
- 26/ 100
Lab reading: 13.0 N, force to bend the shoe 30° (lab bending test); the score is our 0–100 rescaling of it.
- Midsole firmness Derived
- 63/ 100
Lab reading: 36.8 Asker C, midsole durometer reading (higher = firmer); the score is our 0–100 rescaling of it.
How it compares
Compare:Altra Timp 6 vs Topo Athletic Pursuit 3Altra Timp 6 vs Icebug Acceleritas 9 RB9X
Wrong value? Missing data? Tell me
Sources
- Altra Timp 6 Men's Shoes Black/Orange | Running WarehouseretailerRunning Warehouseaccessed 2026-10-04open ↗
- Altra Timp 6 Review – iRunFarreviewiRunFaraccessed 2026-10-04open ↗
- altra-timp-6 lateral product photoimageRunning Warehouseaccessed 2026-10-04open ↗
- altra-timp-6 lateral product photoimageRunning Warehouseaccessed 2026-10-04open ↗
- altra-timp-6 medial product photoimageRunning Warehouseaccessed 2026-10-04open ↗
- altra-timp-6 medial product photoimageRunning Warehouseaccessed 2026-10-04open ↗
- Cut in half: Altra Timp 6 Review (2026) | RunRepeatlabRunRepeataccessed 2026-10-04open ↗
- altra-timp-6 sole product photoimageRunning Warehouseaccessed 2026-10-04open ↗
- altra-timp-6 top product photoimageRunning Warehouseaccessed 2026-10-04open ↗
Technical detail: every recorded value, method and version (31)
All approved observations
Every recorded value, including superseded ones. The displayed value per metric is chosen by precedence (measured › stated › derived › AI estimated), then confidence, then recency. 59 further observations awaiting review.
| Metric | Value | Class | Confidence | Method | Source | Recorded |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Heel-to-toe drop | 0 mm | Derived | Medium | Calculated | — | 2026-10-04 |
| Heel stack | 30 mm | Stated | Medium | Spec listing | Running Warehouse | 2026-10-04 |
| Forefoot stack | 30 mm | Stated | Medium | Spec listing | Running Warehouse | 2026-10-04 |
| Weight | 323 g | Stated | Low | Spec listing | iRunFar | 2026-10-04 |
| Weight | 324 g | Stated | Low | Spec listing | iRunFar | 2026-10-04 |
| Rocker apex | 70.4 % | est. | Low | Side photo | Running Warehouse | 2026-10-04 |
| Rocker apex | 69.8 % | est. | Low | Side photo | Running Warehouse | 2026-10-04 |
| Rocker radius | 44 % | est. | Low | Side photo | Running Warehouse | 2026-10-04 |
| Rocker radius | 43 % | est. | Low | Side photo | Running Warehouse | 2026-10-04 |
| Rocker rise angle | 31 deg | est. | Low | Side photo | Running Warehouse | 2026-10-04 |
| Rocker rise angle | 31 deg | est. | Low | Side photo | Running Warehouse | 2026-10-04 |
| Rocker angle at toe | 66 deg | est. | Low | Side photo | Running Warehouse | 2026-10-04 |
| Toe tip over ground | 35 mm | est. | Low | Side photo | Running Warehouse | 2026-10-04 |
| Toe tip over ground | 35 mm | est. | Low | Side photo | Running Warehouse | 2026-10-04 |
| Rocker angle at toe | 65 deg | est. | Low | Side photo | Running Warehouse | 2026-10-04 |
| Visible rocker lift onset | 77.7 % | est. | Low | Side photo | Running Warehouse | 2026-10-04 |
| Visible rocker lift onset | 77.9 % | est. | Low | Side photo | Running Warehouse | 2026-10-04 |
| Toe spring (relative) | 16.8 % | est. | Low | Side photo | Running Warehouse | 2026-10-04 |
| Toe spring (relative) | 16.8 % | est. | Low | Side photo | Running Warehouse | 2026-10-04 |
| Heel bevel length | 8.5 % | est. | Low | Side photo | Running Warehouse | 2026-10-04 |
| Heel bevel length | 8.7 % | est. | Low | Side photo | Running Warehouse | 2026-10-04 |
| Heel bevel height | 11 mm | est. | Low | Side photo | Running Warehouse | 2026-10-04 |
| Heel bevel height | 11 mm | est. | Low | Side photo | Running Warehouse | 2026-10-04 |
| Midsole width (forefoot) | 113.9 mm | Measured | Medium | Lab test | RunRepeat | 2026-10-04 |
| Midsole width (heel) | 84.4 mm | Measured | Medium | Lab test | RunRepeat | 2026-10-04 |
| Toe box shape | 83 % | est. | Low | Top photo | Running Warehouse | 2026-10-04 |
| Toe box shape | 82 % | est. | Low | Top photo | Running Warehouse | 2026-10-04 |
| Interior forefoot width | 99.2 mm | Measured | Medium | Lab test | RunRepeat | 2026-10-04 |
| Toebox width | 81.9 mm | Measured | Medium | Lab test | RunRepeat | 2026-10-04 |
| Longitudinal stiffness | 26 | Derived | Medium | Lab flex test | RunRepeat | 2026-10-04 |
| Midsole firmness | 63 | Derived | Medium | Lab durometer | RunRepeat | 2026-10-04 |
Classes: Manufacturer stated · Externally measured · AI estimated · Derived · User reported. Hover a method for its identifier and algorithm version.
Source notes
- Running Warehouse: sha256=9cb8e73ded91e91a196753bc711b204cb4de8f204f7620de565c302c2deac4c7; 0.3
- Running Warehouse: sha256=7fe13a39692dd99b220b0f1da594eefcbf3130681a3e05fe08dfaeb7eefa06a0; 0.3
- Running Warehouse: sha256=30f2bd0fce8ecb85edb646ba92abc4bf67b947cf518770257acd3dc3c145305e; 0.3
- Running Warehouse: sha256=8097a89d8a4338a197820398d0cbc26c9d6bc71b46420a7ec0658c7cb1b5d525; 0.3
- Running Warehouse: sha256=693518311d18d59d50b4da29fa123deb89cfc78fc5ade9f4faa4cb6455024d42; 0.1
- Running Warehouse: sha256=1e4a07fe3317017ab1e557d9c9e5a89cb6de1a62fc3ce79a0ba00e88d265564e; 0.1
Shoes with similar geometry
Compare these →Closest current models from other lines by stack, drop, rocker, toe height, stiffness, firmness, weight and width, whichever both shoes have.
- Drop
- 0 mm
- Heel
- 33 mm
- Toe rocker
- 32%
vs this shoe: 3 mm higher heel
- Drop
- 0 mm
- Heel
- 28 mm
- Toe rocker
- —
vs this shoe: 23 g lighter
- Drop
- 0 mm
- Heel
- 25 mm
- Toe rocker
- 27%
vs this shoe: 8 mm lower toe · 5 mm lower heel · firmer foam
- Drop
- 4 mm
- Heel
- 35 mm
- Toe rocker
- 35%
vs this shoe: 4 mm more drop · 5 mm higher heel · softer foam