ShoeGeometry

Altra Olympus 7

TrailTrailNo plate2026Men'sCurrent

At a glance

Heel-to-toe drop
0 mmStated
Stack, heel / forefoot
33 / 33 mmStated
Weight
325 gStated
Plate
No plate
Toe rocker
32 % of lengthest.photos 30–34 %
Heel bevel
7.1 % of lengthest.rough estimate; photos 7–10 %
Stiffness / firmness
not measured yet
Primary foam
Altra EGO MAX

How it compares

  • Altra Olympus 7's heel-to-toe drop is 0 mm, lower than the catalogue median of 6 mm (0% of the 179 other current shoes are lower).
  • Altra Olympus 7's heel stack is 33 mm, thinner than the catalogue median of 38 mm (14% of the 176 other current shoes are thinner).
  • Altra Olympus 7's forefoot stack is 33 mm, thicker than the catalogue median of 31.5 mm (59% of the 171 other current shoes are thinner).
  • Altra Olympus 7's weight is 325 g, heavier than the catalogue median of 269 g (96% of the 167 other current shoes are lighter).
  • 4 shoes with similar geometry from other lines.

Differences smaller than the precision of the sources (about 1 mm of stack, 8 g, or the spread between photos for photo estimates) are reported as about the same.

Specifications

Heel-to-toe drop
Manufacturer stated
0mm
HighSpec listingsource
Heel stack
Manufacturer stated
33mm
MediumSpec listingbrand figure, reported by Running Warehousesource
Forefoot stack
Manufacturer stated
33mm
MediumSpec listingbrand figure, reported by Running Warehousesource
Weight
Manufacturer stated
325g
HighSpec listingsource
Plate
No plate
Primary foam
Altra EGO MAX
List price
$195

Plate, foam and price from Olympus 7 Men’s Trail Running Shoe Dark Olive/Black | Altra Running US.

Geometry

Catalogue average: heel 38 mm, forefoot 32 mm, toe rocker 35 %Altra Olympus 7: heel 33 mm, forefoot 33 mm (drop 0 mm); toe rocker 32 % of length, radius 46 % of length; heel bevel 7 % of length, 12 mm high at the back, ending behind the heel bone (only the back edge is rounded).33 mm33 mmUnder the centre of the heel bone: 12 % of length from the heel, where heel stack is measuredheel boneHeel contact: the sole is within 4.5 mm of the ground from 7 % of length (foam compresses more under load), ending behind the heel bone (only the back edge is rounded)heel bevel 7 %Toe rocker: the front 32 % of the length curves up (the curve leaves the ground 68 % of length from the heel)toe rocker 32 %toeheel
Front: toe rocker shorter longerRear: heel stack lower higher not measured
Dashed: average of the catalogue
Illustrative profile, not a photograph or scan: drawn to scale for a 300 mm shoe from published stack heights and photo estimates of the unloaded shoe (under body weight the foam compresses and the curves flatten). The grey upper is a generic outline, not this shoe’s. Altra Olympus 7: heel 33 mm, forefoot 33 mm (drop 0 mm); toe rocker 32 % of length, radius 46 % of length; heel bevel 7 % of length, 12 mm high at the back, ending behind the heel bone (only the back edge is rounded). Heel bone: 12 % of length from the heel, where heel stack is measured. Heel bevel and toe rocker are marked where each curve meets the ground; for the heel that is where the sole comes within 4.5 mm of the ground, which foam compression closes under body weight.

Percent values are relative to shoe length so they compare across images and sizes; widths in millimetres are lab measurements from the cited source, while toe tip and heel heights in millimetres are photo estimates converted for a men’s US 9 (assumed 300 mm long), so approximate. See how rocker geometry is defined.

Toe rocker
AI estimated
32%

4 photos range 30–34 %; shown is their median.

LowSide photosource
Rocker radius
AI estimated
46%

4 photos range 39–46 %; shown is one of the two that agree most closely.

LowSide photosource
Rocker rise angle
AI estimated
26deg

4 photos range 25–27 deg; shown is their median.

LowSide photosource
Toe tip over ground
AI estimated
34mm*

4 photos range 31–35 mm; shown is their median (* the photos disagree by more than usual).

LowSide photosource
Rocker angle at toe
AI estimated
56deg

4 photos range 48–58 deg; shown is one of the two that agree most closely.

LowSide photosource
Visible rocker lift onset
AI estimated
79.2%

4 photos range 79.2–82.2 %; shown is one of the two that agree most closely.

LowSide photosource
Toe spring (relative)
AI estimated
15.8%

4 photos range 15–15.9 %; shown is their median.

LowSide photosource
Heel bevel length
AI estimated
7.1%

4 photos range 7.1–9.5 %; shown is the average of the two that agree most closely.

LowSide photosource
Heel bevel height
AI estimated
12mm

4 photos range 12–13 mm; shown is the average of the two that agree most closely.

LowSide photosource
Toe box shape
AI estimated
84%

2 photos range 83–85 %; shown is the average of the two that agree most closely.

LowTop photosource

How it compares

Appears in:Zero dropLow drop

Compare:Altra Olympus 7 vs Topo Athletic Pursuit 3Altra Olympus 7 vs Saucony Peregrine 16

Wrong value? Missing data? Tell me
Stored only to improve the site; see privacy.

Sources

  • Olympus 7 Men’s Trail Running Shoe Dark Olive/Black | Altra Running USmanufactureraltrarunning.comaccessed 2026-10-04open ↗
  • Altra Olympus 7 Men's Shoes Taupe/Fungi/Birch | Running WarehouseretailerRunning Warehouseaccessed 2026-10-04open ↗
  • altra-olympus-7 lateral product photoimageRunning Warehouseaccessed 2026-10-04open ↗
  • altra-olympus-7 medial product photoimageRunning Warehouseaccessed 2026-10-04open ↗
  • altra-olympus-7 medial product photoimageRunning Warehouseaccessed 2026-10-04open ↗
  • altra-olympus-7 lateral product photoimageRunning Warehouseaccessed 2026-10-04open ↗
  • altra-olympus-7 sole product photoimageRunning Warehouseaccessed 2026-10-04open ↗
  • altra-olympus-7 top product photoimageRunning Warehouseaccessed 2026-10-04open ↗
Technical detail: every recorded value, method and version (26)

All approved observations

Every recorded value, including superseded ones. The displayed value per metric is chosen by precedence (measured › stated › derived › AI estimated), then confidence, then recency. 58 further observations awaiting review.

MetricValueClassConfidenceMethodSourceRecorded
Heel-to-toe drop0 mmStatedHighSpec listingaltrarunning.com2026-10-04
Heel stack33 mmStatedMediumSpec listingaltrarunning.com2026-10-04
Heel stack33 mmStatedMediumSpec listingRunning Warehouse2026-10-04
Forefoot stack33 mmStatedMediumSpec listingRunning Warehouse2026-10-04
Weight325 gStatedHighSpec listingaltrarunning.com2026-10-04
Weight320 gStatedMediumSpec listingRunning Warehouse2026-10-04
Rocker apex67.4 %est.LowSide photoRunning Warehouse2026-10-04
Rocker apex68.2 %est.LowSide photoRunning Warehouse2026-10-04
Rocker radius44 %est.LowSide photoRunning Warehouse2026-10-04
Rocker radius46 %est.LowSide photoRunning Warehouse2026-10-04
Rocker rise angle25 degest.LowSide photoRunning Warehouse2026-10-04
Rocker rise angle26 degest.LowSide photoRunning Warehouse2026-10-04
Toe tip over ground35 mmest.LowSide photoRunning Warehouse2026-10-04
Toe tip over ground35 mmest.LowSide photoRunning Warehouse2026-10-04
Rocker angle at toe56 degest.LowSide photoRunning Warehouse2026-10-04
Rocker angle at toe58 degest.LowSide photoRunning Warehouse2026-10-04
Visible rocker lift onset79.7 %est.LowSide photoRunning Warehouse2026-10-04
Visible rocker lift onset79.2 %est.LowSide photoRunning Warehouse2026-10-04
Toe spring (relative)15.8 %est.LowSide photoRunning Warehouse2026-10-04
Toe spring (relative)15.9 %est.LowSide photoRunning Warehouse2026-10-04
Heel bevel length7.2 %est.LowSide photoRunning Warehouse2026-10-04
Heel bevel length7.1 %est.LowSide photoRunning Warehouse2026-10-04
Heel bevel height12 mmest.LowSide photoRunning Warehouse2026-10-04
Heel bevel height12 mmest.LowSide photoRunning Warehouse2026-10-04
Toe box shape85 %est.LowTop photoRunning Warehouse2026-10-04
Toe box shape83 %est.LowTop photoRunning Warehouse2026-10-04

Classes: Manufacturer stated · Externally measured · AI estimated · Derived · User reported. Hover a method for its identifier and algorithm version.

Source notes

  • Running Warehouse: sha256=dcd680b6a4db12757b5ba5916d7e5a29968736315634c84b0853ed3600e969ee; 0.3
  • Running Warehouse: sha256=4c61d1c4d299d13a6ea63791fd6b66d6a2c5521672d42de82c85ea50839b3325; 0.3
  • Running Warehouse: sha256=5d7bcbd5740b79d59dbb5c09bd4c23464ddd26a6b44847c42844e5e8de977a8a; 0.3
  • Running Warehouse: sha256=552ad306d4612687663bacd5ac7094531c932d3d4b679438f3e11c9e812d12c2; 0.3
  • Running Warehouse: sha256=8fddc0e7fa4ebe23193e991af5d3860ece3bafc24f3e66a3d1c7166303fd9280; 0.1
  • Running Warehouse: sha256=875f863fbb758daa541475bdb7814404069d0a7d9e617ac866093d0a98f93cdc; 0.1

Shoes with similar geometry

Compare these →

Closest current models from other lines by stack, drop, rocker, toe height, stiffness, firmness, weight and width, whichever both shoes have.

Side profile illustration of the Altra Timp 6
Altra
Timp 6
Trail · No plate
Drop
0 mm
Heel
30 mm
Toe rocker
31%

vs this shoe: 3 mm lower heel

Side profile illustration of the Topo Athletic Pursuit 3
Topo Athletic
Pursuit 3
Trail · No plate
Drop
0 mm
Heel
28 mm
Toe rocker
—

vs this shoe: 5 mm lower heel · 24 g lighter

Side profile illustration of the Nike ACG Pegasus Trail
Nike
ACG Pegasus Trail
Road/trail hybrid · No plate
Drop
4 mm
Heel
35 mm
Toe rocker
35%

vs this shoe: 4 mm more drop

Side profile illustration of the Nike ACG Zegama
Nike
ACG Zegama
Trail · Rock plate
Drop
4 mm
Heel
38 mm
Toe rocker
35%

vs this shoe: 4 mm more drop · 5 mm higher heel