ShoeGeometry

Nike ACG Zegama

TrailTrailRock plate2026Men'sCurrent

Specifications

Heel-to-toe drop
Derived
4mm
Mediumderived_from_stack_v1source
Heel stack
Manufacturer stated
38mm
Lowregex_specs_v2source
Forefoot stack
Manufacturer stated
34mm
Lowregex_specs_v2source
Weight
Manufacturer stated
320g
Mediumregex_specs_v2source
Plate
Rock plate
Primary foam
ZoomX + Cushlon 3.0
List price
$180

Plate, foam and price from The Nike ACG Zegama Trail Is Finally Worthy Of Its Name | Believe in the Run.

Geometry

Catalogue average: heel 39 mm, forefoot 32 mm, rocker apex 65 %Nike ACG Zegama: heel 38 mm, forefoot 34 mm (drop 4 mm); rocker apex 66 % of length, radius 50 % of length.38 mm34 mmRocker apex at 66 % of length from the heelrocker apex 66 %toeheel
Forefoot: rocker apex later earlierRear: heel stack lower higher not measured
Dashed: average of the catalogue
Drawn from the measured values, to scale for a 290 mm shoe; the grey upper is a generic outline, not this shoe’s. Nike ACG Zegama: heel 38 mm, forefoot 34 mm (drop 4 mm); rocker apex 66 % of length, radius 50 % of length.

Percent values are relative to shoe length so they compare across images and sizes; millimetre values are lab measurements from the cited source. See how rocker geometry is defined.

Rocker apex
AI estimated
65.5%
Mediumvision_rocker · 0.3-bc1source
Rocker radius
AI estimated
50%
Mediumvision_rocker · 0.3-bc1source
Rocker rise angle
AI estimated
22deg
Mediumvision_rocker · 0.3-bc1source
Toe tip over ground
AI estimated
34mm

Average of two photos 0 mm apart.

Mediumvision_rocker · 0.3-bc1source
Rocker angle at toe
AI estimated
46deg
Lowvision_rocker · 0.3-bc1source
Visible rocker lift onset
AI estimated
77.5%
Mediumvision_rocker · 0.3-bc1source
Toe spring (relative)
AI estimated
18.1%
Lowvision_rocker · 0.3-bc1source

How it compares

  • Nike ACG Zegama's heel-to-toe drop is 4 mm, lower than the catalogue median of 7 mm (4% of the 91 other current shoes are lower).
  • Nike ACG Zegama's heel stack is 38 mm, thinner than the catalogue median of 39 mm (34% of the 91 other current shoes are thinner).
  • Nike ACG Zegama's forefoot stack is 34 mm, thicker than the catalogue median of 32 mm (63% of the 91 other current shoes are thinner).
  • Nike ACG Zegama's weight is 315 g, heavier than the catalogue median of 268 g (91% of the 82 other current shoes are lighter).

Appears in:Low drop

Compare:Nike ACG Zegama vs Hoka Speedgoat 7Nike ACG Zegama vs Hoka Tecton X 4Nike ACG Zegama vs New Balance Fresh Foam X Hierro v9

Wrong value? Missing data? Tell me
Stored only to improve the site; see privacy.

Sources

  • The Nike ACG Zegama Trail Is Finally Worthy Of Its Name | Believe in the Runreviewbelieveintherun.comaccessed 2026-10-03open ↗
  • Nike ACG Zegama Trail Men's Shoes Platinum/Black/Hyper | Running Warehouseretailerrunningwarehouse.comaccessed 2026-10-03open ↗
  • nike-acg-zegama lateral product photoimageRunning Warehouseaccessed 2026-10-03open ↗sha256=aec155a0038596cf25fe26613cf8443c9a8ea78d0a61d603626af71fd32e7226; 0.3
  • nike-acg-zegama lateral product photoimageRunning Warehouseaccessed 2026-10-03open ↗sha256=b51ffb7fb5eb049498beb796f28bd3471d9eee6dfa2b6442788c1b9a62940aa9; 0.3
  • nike-acg-zegama medial product photoimageRunning Warehouseaccessed 2026-10-03open ↗sha256=0b29b7223120bdf63f12686d6f5f7e22f5f3acc0dbbe3158c6b22d07aa1bdc5d; 0.3
  • nike-acg-zegama medial product photoimageRunning Warehouseaccessed 2026-10-03open ↗sha256=8a75dd90a6b7f819cfd9c48eef13644b39d68350a8243b90e83626376f4d5cce; 0.3
  • nike-acg-zegama medial product photoimageRunning Warehouseaccessed 2026-10-03open ↗sha256=cef461b45e2e59bad7527e722a30ecc4803fd770f10b26694a36d82ea218c7b3; 0.3
  • nike-acg-zegama lateral product photoimageRunning Warehouseaccessed 2026-10-03open ↗sha256=a3e6f41d2791ee557b4439ddf5be69f40725863e5bc2aeb64eaa3ccae32aed21; 0.3

All approved observations

Every recorded value, including superseded ones. The displayed value per metric is chosen by precedence (measured › stated › derived › AI estimated), then confidence, then recency. 83 further observations awaiting review.

MetricValueClassConfidenceMethodSourceRecorded
Heel-to-toe drop4 mmDerivedMediumderived_from_stack_v1believeintherun.com2026-10-03
Heel stack38 mmStatedLowregex_specs_v2believeintherun.com2026-10-03
Forefoot stack34 mmStatedLowregex_specs_v2believeintherun.com2026-10-03
Weight315 gStatedMediumregex_specs_v2runningwarehouse.com2026-10-03
Weight320 gStatedMediumregex_specs_v2believeintherun.com2026-10-03
Weight310 gStatedMediumregex_specs_v2believeintherun.com2026-10-03
Rocker apex65.5 %est.Lowvision_rocker 0.3-bc1Running Warehouse2026-10-03
Rocker apex65.5 %est.Mediumvision_rocker 0.3-bc1Running Warehouse2026-10-03
Rocker radius50 %est.Mediumvision_rocker 0.3-bc1Running Warehouse2026-10-03
Rocker radius50 %est.Mediumvision_rocker 0.3-bc1Running Warehouse2026-10-03
Rocker rise angle24 degest.Mediumvision_rocker 0.3-bc1Running Warehouse2026-10-03
Rocker rise angle22 degest.Mediumvision_rocker 0.3-bc1Running Warehouse2026-10-03
Rocker angle at toe46 degest.Lowvision_rocker 0.3-bc1Running Warehouse2026-10-03
Rocker angle at toe46 degest.Lowvision_rocker 0.3-bc1Running Warehouse2026-10-03
Toe tip over ground34 mmest.Mediumvision_rocker 0.3-bc1Running Warehouse2026-10-03
Toe tip over ground34 mmest.Mediumvision_rocker 0.3-bc1Running Warehouse2026-10-03
Visible rocker lift onset77.5 %est.Mediumvision_rocker 0.3-bc1Running Warehouse2026-10-03
Visible rocker lift onset77.1 %est.Mediumvision_rocker 0.3-bc1Running Warehouse2026-10-03
Toe spring (relative)17.9 %est.Lowvision_rocker 0.3-bc1Running Warehouse2026-10-03
Toe spring (relative)18.1 %est.Lowvision_rocker 0.3-bc1Running Warehouse2026-10-03

Classes: Manufacturer stated · Externally measured · AI estimated · Derived · User reported.

Compare these →

Closest current models from other lines by stack, drop, rocker, toe height, stiffness, firmness, weight and width, whichever both shoes have.