ASICS Magic Speed 5
At a glance
- Heel-to-toe drop
- 7 mmStated
- Stack, heel / forefoot
- 36 / 29 mmStated
- Weight
- 196 gStated
- Plate
- Carbon plate
- Toe rocker
- 36 % of lengthest.photos 33–40 %
- Heel bevel
- 9.1 % of lengthest.rough estimate; photos 9–11 %
- Stiffness / firmness
- 27 / 25 of 100Derived
- Primary foam
- FF Leap top / FF Blast Plus bottom
How it compares
- ASICS Magic Speed 5's heel-to-toe drop is 7 mm, higher than the catalogue median of 6 mm (54% of the 179 other current shoes are lower).
- ASICS Magic Speed 5's heel stack is 36 mm, thinner than the catalogue median of 38 mm (28% of the 176 other current shoes are thinner).
- ASICS Magic Speed 5's forefoot stack is 29 mm, thinner than the catalogue median of 31.5 mm (27% of the 171 other current shoes are thinner).
- ASICS Magic Speed 5's weight is 196 g, lighter than the catalogue median of 269 g (8% of the 167 other current shoes are lighter).
- Against the ASICS Magic Speed 4: stack lower, stiffness more flexible, weight lighter (details).
- 4 shoes with similar geometry from other lines.
Differences smaller than the precision of the sources (about 1 mm of stack, 8 g, or the spread between photos for photo estimates) are reported as about the same.
Specifications
- Heel-to-toe drop Manufacturer stated
- 7mm
- Heel stack Manufacturer stated
- 36mm
- Forefoot stack Manufacturer stated
- 29mm
- Weight Manufacturer stated
- 196g
- Plate
- Carbon plate
- Primary foam
- FF Leap top / FF Blast Plus bottom
- List price
- $180
Geometry
Percent values are relative to shoe length so they compare across images and sizes; widths in millimetres are lab measurements from the cited source, while toe tip and heel heights in millimetres are photo estimates converted for a men’s US 9 (assumed 300 mm long), so approximate. See how rocker geometry is defined.
- Toe rocker AI estimated
- 36%
4 photos range 33–40 %; shown is their median.
- Rocker radius AI estimated
- 37%
4 photos range 36–52 %; shown is one of the two that agree most closely.
- Rocker rise angle AI estimated
- 30deg
4 photos range 28–32 deg; shown is their median.
- Toe tip over ground AI estimated
- 44mm
4 photos range 43–47 mm; shown is their median.
- Rocker angle at toe AI estimated
- 61deg
4 photos range 60–62 deg; shown is one of the two that agree most closely.
- Visible rocker lift onset AI estimated
- 77.9%
4 photos range 72.3–77.9 %; shown is one of the two that agree most closely.
- Toe spring (relative) AI estimated
- 20.5%
4 photos range 20.2–21.3 %; shown is their median.
- Heel bevel length AI estimated
- 9.1%
4 photos range 8.8–11.2 %; shown is the average of the two that agree most closely.
- Heel bevel height AI estimated
- 25mm
4 photos range 23–27 mm; shown is the average of the two that agree most closely.
- Midsole width (forefoot) Externally measured
- 110.1mm
- Midsole width (heel) Externally measured
- 78.1mm
- Interior forefoot width Externally measured
- 95.1mm
- Toebox width Externally measured
- 71.9mm
Stiffness
- Longitudinal stiffness Derived
- 27/ 100
Lab reading: 13.1 N, force to bend the shoe 30° (lab bending test); the score is our 0–100 rescaling of it.
- Midsole firmness Derived
- 25/ 100
Lab reading: 27.0 Asker C, midsole durometer reading (higher = firmer); the score is our 0–100 rescaling of it.
How it compares
Appears in:Carbon plateLightweight
Compare:ASICS Magic Speed 5 vs ASICS Magic Speed 4ASICS Magic Speed 5 vs Adidas Adizero Boston 13ASICS Magic Speed 5 vs Adidas Adizero Evo SLPrevious version: ASICS Magic Speed 4
What changed from the ASICS Magic Speed 4
Stack lower, stiffness more flexible, weight lighter. Compared with the previous version in this catalogue; differences within measurement noise are shown as about the same.
- ASICS Magic Speed 536/29 mm · toe rocker 36 % · heel bevel 9 %
- ASICS Magic Speed 444/36 mm · toe rocker 34 % · heel bevel 9 %
| Measure | ASICS Magic Speed 4 | ASICS Magic Speed 5 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Heel stack | 43.5 mm | 36 mm | lower (−7.5 mm) |
| Forefoot stack | 35.5 mm | 29 mm | lower (−6.5 mm) |
| Drop | 8 mm | 7 mm | less (−1 mm) |
| Weight | 241 g | 196 g | lighter (−45 g) |
| Toe rocker | 34% of length | 35.7% of length | about the same |
| Toe tip over ground | 45 mm | 44.4 mm | about the same |
| Rocker rise angle | 33.6° | 29.9° | flatter (−3.7) |
| Stiffness | 98/100 | 27/100 | more flexible (−71) |
| Firmness | 43/100 | 25/100 | softer (−18) |
| Forefoot base width | 109.6 mm | 110.1 mm | about the same |
| Plate | Carbon composite | Carbon plate | naming difference: a carbon plate in both; sources describe it differently (full carbon vs carbon-infused) |
| Foam | FF Blast+ with FF Turbo forefoot insert | FF Leap top / FF Blast Plus bottom | unclear: named differently; the sources do not say whether the material changed |
Wrong value? Missing data? Tell me
Sources
- SHOE REVIEW: Asics Magic Speed 5 - Canadian Running MagazinereviewCanadian Runningaccessed 2026-10-04open ↗
- ASICS Magic Speed 5 Unisex Shoes White/Black | Running WarehouseretailerRunning Warehouseaccessed 2026-10-04open ↗
- asics-magic-speed-5 medial product photoimageRunning Warehouseaccessed 2026-10-04open ↗
- asics-magic-speed-5 medial product photoimageRunning Warehouseaccessed 2026-10-04open ↗
- asics-magic-speed-5 lateral product photoimageRunning Warehouseaccessed 2026-10-04open ↗
- Cut in half: ASICS Magic Speed 5 Review (2026) | RunRepeatlabRunRepeataccessed 2026-10-04open ↗
Technical detail: every recorded value, method and version (29)
All approved observations
Every recorded value, including superseded ones. The displayed value per metric is chosen by precedence (measured › stated › derived › AI estimated), then confidence, then recency. 57 further observations awaiting review.
| Metric | Value | Class | Confidence | Method | Source | Recorded |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Heel-to-toe drop | 7 mm | Stated | Medium | Spec listing | Canadian Running | 2026-10-04 |
| Heel stack | 36 mm | Stated | Medium | Spec listing | Running Warehouse | 2026-10-04 |
| Forefoot stack | 29 mm | Stated | Medium | Spec listing | Running Warehouse | 2026-10-04 |
| Weight | 196 g | Stated | Medium | Spec listing | Canadian Running | 2026-10-04 |
| Weight | 201 g | Stated | Medium | Spec listing | Running Warehouse | 2026-10-04 |
| Rocker apex | 67.3 % | est. | Low | Side photo | Running Warehouse | 2026-10-04 |
| Rocker apex | 67 % | est. | Low | Side photo | Running Warehouse | 2026-10-04 |
| Rocker radius | 37 % | est. | Low | Side photo | Running Warehouse | 2026-10-04 |
| Rocker radius | 36 % | est. | Low | Side photo | Running Warehouse | 2026-10-04 |
| Rocker rise angle | 32 deg | est. | Low | Side photo | Running Warehouse | 2026-10-04 |
| Rocker rise angle | 32 deg | est. | Low | Side photo | Running Warehouse | 2026-10-04 |
| Toe tip over ground | 44 mm | est. | Low | Side photo | Running Warehouse | 2026-10-04 |
| Toe tip over ground | 44 mm | est. | Low | Side photo | Running Warehouse | 2026-10-04 |
| Rocker angle at toe | 60 deg | est. | Low | Side photo | Running Warehouse | 2026-10-04 |
| Rocker angle at toe | 61 deg | est. | Low | Side photo | Running Warehouse | 2026-10-04 |
| Visible rocker lift onset | 77.9 % | est. | Low | Side photo | Running Warehouse | 2026-10-04 |
| Visible rocker lift onset | 77.6 % | est. | Low | Side photo | Running Warehouse | 2026-10-04 |
| Toe spring (relative) | 20.3 % | est. | Low | Side photo | Running Warehouse | 2026-10-04 |
| Toe spring (relative) | 20.2 % | est. | Low | Side photo | Running Warehouse | 2026-10-04 |
| Heel bevel length | 9.4 % | est. | Low | Side photo | Running Warehouse | 2026-10-04 |
| Heel bevel length | 8.8 % | est. | Low | Side photo | Running Warehouse | 2026-10-04 |
| Heel bevel height | 24 mm | est. | Low | Side photo | Running Warehouse | 2026-10-04 |
| Heel bevel height | 25 mm | est. | Low | Side photo | Running Warehouse | 2026-10-04 |
| Midsole width (forefoot) | 110.1 mm | Measured | Medium | Lab test | RunRepeat | 2026-10-04 |
| Midsole width (heel) | 78.1 mm | Measured | Medium | Lab test | RunRepeat | 2026-10-04 |
| Interior forefoot width | 95.1 mm | Measured | Medium | Lab test | RunRepeat | 2026-10-04 |
| Toebox width | 71.9 mm | Measured | Medium | Lab test | RunRepeat | 2026-10-04 |
| Longitudinal stiffness | 27 | Derived | Medium | Lab flex test | RunRepeat | 2026-10-04 |
| Midsole firmness | 25 | Derived | Medium | Lab durometer | RunRepeat | 2026-10-04 |
Classes: Manufacturer stated · Externally measured · AI estimated · Derived · User reported. Hover a method for its identifier and algorithm version.
Source notes
- Running Warehouse: sha256=eff2df6fe497af8d979fd3a15ec27e4f99c6ed4fe9756aec06a3de3fed29e34b; 0.3
- Running Warehouse: sha256=9c69623b02157180a35d92448f9649c06778fd10aed15568f98dc5ec7136fb47; 0.3
- Running Warehouse: sha256=8f75a2f2c940f33567c2be450e40cae005504f0103ef93d1c1d3c2fd1e5d9647; 0.3
Shoes with similar geometry
Compare these →Closest current models from other lines by stack, drop, rocker, toe height, stiffness, firmness, weight and width, whichever both shoes have.
- Drop
- 6 mm
- Heel
- 35 mm
- Toe rocker
- 36%
Very close on every shared measure
- Drop
- 8 mm
- Heel
- 39 mm
- Toe rocker
- 36%
vs this shoe: 3 mm higher heel
- Drop
- 5.5 mm
- Heel
- 39 mm
- Toe rocker
- 34%
vs this shoe: 3 mm higher heel
- Drop
- 5 mm
- Heel
- 40 mm
- Toe rocker
- 34%
vs this shoe: 4 mm higher heel · 2 mm less drop