ShoeGeometry

Mizuno Hyperwarp Pro

RacingRoadCarbon composite2026Men'sCurrent

At a glance

Heel-to-toe drop
5.5 mmStated
Stack, heel / forefoot
39 / 33.5 mmStated
Weight
201 gStatedsize 9
Plate
Carbon composite
Toe rocker
34 % of lengthest.photos 33–34 %
Heel bevel
17.2 % of lengthest.rough estimate; photos 17–17 %
Stiffness / firmness
not measured yet
Primary foam
MIZUNO ENERZY XP (supercritical TPEE)

How it compares

  • Mizuno Hyperwarp Pro's heel-to-toe drop is 5.5 mm, about the catalogue median of 6 mm (24% of the 179 other current shoes are lower).
  • Mizuno Hyperwarp Pro's heel stack is 39 mm, thicker than the catalogue median of 38 mm (55% of the 176 other current shoes are thinner).
  • Mizuno Hyperwarp Pro's forefoot stack is 33.5 mm, thicker than the catalogue median of 31.5 mm (68% of the 171 other current shoes are thinner).
  • Mizuno Hyperwarp Pro's weight is 201 g, lighter than the catalogue median of 269 g (9% of the 167 other current shoes are lighter).
  • 4 shoes with similar geometry from other lines.

Differences smaller than the precision of the sources (about 1 mm of stack, 8 g, or the spread between photos for photo estimates) are reported as about the same.

Specifications

Heel-to-toe drop
Manufacturer stated
5.5mm
MediumSpec listingbrand figure, reported by Doctors of Runningsource
Heel stack
Manufacturer stated
39mm
MediumSpec listingbrand figure, reported by Doctors of Runningsource
Forefoot stack
Manufacturer stated
33.5mm
MediumSpec listingbrand figure, reported by Doctors of Runningsource
Weight
Manufacturer stated
201g
MediumSpec listingbrand figure, reported by Doctors of Runningsize 9source
Plate
Carbon composite
Primary foam
MIZUNO ENERZY XP (supercritical TPEE)
List price
$250

Geometry

Catalogue average: heel 38 mm, forefoot 32 mm, toe rocker 35 %Mizuno Hyperwarp Pro: heel 39 mm, forefoot 34 mm (drop 6 mm); toe rocker 34 % of length, radius 39 % of length; heel bevel 17 % of length, 29 mm high at the back, reaching in front of the heel bone (the sole still curves up under it: a heel rocker).39 mm34 mmUnder the centre of the heel bone: 12 % of length from the heel, where heel stack is measuredheel boneHeel contact: the sole is within 4.5 mm of the ground from 17 % of length (foam compresses more under load), reaching in front of the heel bone (the sole still curves up under it: a heel rocker)heel bevel 17 %Toe rocker: the front 34 % of the length curves up (the curve leaves the ground 66 % of length from the heel)toe rocker 34 %toeheel
Front: toe rocker shorter longerRear: heel stack lower higher not measured
Dashed: average of the catalogue
Illustrative profile, not a photograph or scan: drawn to scale for a 300 mm shoe from published stack heights and photo estimates of the unloaded shoe (under body weight the foam compresses and the curves flatten). The grey upper is a generic outline, not this shoe’s. Mizuno Hyperwarp Pro: heel 39 mm, forefoot 34 mm (drop 6 mm); toe rocker 34 % of length, radius 39 % of length; heel bevel 17 % of length, 29 mm high at the back, reaching in front of the heel bone (the sole still curves up under it: a heel rocker). Heel bone: 12 % of length from the heel, where heel stack is measured. Heel bevel and toe rocker are marked where each curve meets the ground; for the heel that is where the sole comes within 4.5 mm of the ground, which foam compression closes under body weight.

Percent values are relative to shoe length so they compare across images and sizes; widths in millimetres are lab measurements from the cited source, while toe tip and heel heights in millimetres are photo estimates converted for a men’s US 9 (assumed 300 mm long), so approximate. See how rocker geometry is defined.

Toe rocker
AI estimated
34%

4 photos range 33–34 %; shown is their median.

MediumSide photosource
Rocker radius
AI estimated
39%

4 photos range 38–39 %; shown is one of the two that agree most closely.

MediumSide photosource
Rocker rise angle
AI estimated
31deg

4 photos range 31–31 deg; shown is their median.

MediumSide photosource
Toe tip over ground
AI estimated
45mm

4 photos range 43–46 mm; shown is their median.

MediumSide photosource
Rocker angle at toe
AI estimated
59deg

4 photos range 56–62 deg; shown is one of the two that agree most closely.

MediumSide photosource
Visible rocker lift onset
AI estimated
76.4%

4 photos range 76.4–77.6 %; shown is one of the two that agree most closely.

LowSide photosource
Toe spring (relative)
AI estimated
20%

4 photos range 19.9–20.3 %; shown is their median.

MediumSide photosource
Heel bevel length
AI estimated
17.2%

4 photos range 16.6–17.2 %; shown is the average of the two that agree most closely.

MediumSide photosource
Heel bevel height
AI estimated
29mm

4 photos range 29–31 mm; shown is the average of the two that agree most closely.

MediumSide photosource

How it compares

Appears in:Carbon plateLightweight

Compare:Mizuno Hyperwarp Pro vs ASICS Metaspeed Edge ParisMizuno Hyperwarp Pro vs ASICS Metaspeed Sky Paris

Wrong value? Missing data? Tell me
Stored only to improve the site; see privacy.

Sources

  • Mizuno Hyperwarp Pro Unisex Shoes White/Black | Running WarehouseretailerRunning Warehouseaccessed 2026-10-04open ↗
  • Mizuno Hyperwarp Pro Review (2026) - Doctors of RunningreviewDoctors of Runningaccessed 2026-10-04open ↗
  • mizuno-hyperwarp-pro lateral product photoimageRunning Warehouseaccessed 2026-10-04open ↗
  • mizuno-hyperwarp-pro lateral product photoimageRunning Warehouseaccessed 2026-10-04open ↗
  • mizuno-hyperwarp-pro medial product photoimageRunning Warehouseaccessed 2026-10-04open ↗
  • mizuno-hyperwarp-pro medial product photoimageRunning Warehouseaccessed 2026-10-04open ↗
Technical detail: every recorded value, method and version (24)

All approved observations

Every recorded value, including superseded ones. The displayed value per metric is chosen by precedence (measured › stated › derived › AI estimated), then confidence, then recency. 59 further observations awaiting review.

MetricValueClassConfidenceMethodSourceRecorded
Heel-to-toe drop5.5 mmStatedMediumSpec listingRunning Warehouse2026-10-04
Heel-to-toe drop5.5 mmStatedMediumSpec listingDoctors of Running2026-10-04
Heel stack39 mmStatedMediumSpec listingDoctors of Running2026-10-04
Forefoot stack33.5 mmStatedMediumSpec listingDoctors of Running2026-10-04
Weight198 gStatedMediumSpec listingRunning Warehouse2026-10-04
Weight201 g (size 9)StatedMediumSpec listingDoctors of Running2026-10-04
Rocker apex66.6 %est.MediumSide photoRunning Warehouse2026-10-04
Rocker apex66.7 %est.MediumSide photoRunning Warehouse2026-10-04
Rocker radius39 %est.MediumSide photoRunning Warehouse2026-10-04
Rocker radius39 %est.LowSide photoRunning Warehouse2026-10-04
Rocker rise angle31 degest.MediumSide photoRunning Warehouse2026-10-04
Rocker rise angle31 degest.MediumSide photoRunning Warehouse2026-10-04
Toe tip over ground45 mmest.LowSide photoRunning Warehouse2026-10-04
Rocker angle at toe58 degest.LowSide photoRunning Warehouse2026-10-04
Rocker angle at toe59 degest.MediumSide photoRunning Warehouse2026-10-04
Toe tip over ground44 mmest.MediumSide photoRunning Warehouse2026-10-04
Visible rocker lift onset76.5 %est.LowSide photoRunning Warehouse2026-10-04
Visible rocker lift onset76.4 %est.LowSide photoRunning Warehouse2026-10-04
Toe spring (relative)20 %est.MediumSide photoRunning Warehouse2026-10-04
Toe spring (relative)19.9 %est.MediumSide photoRunning Warehouse2026-10-04
Heel bevel length17.2 %est.MediumSide photoRunning Warehouse2026-10-04
Heel bevel length17.2 %est.LowSide photoRunning Warehouse2026-10-04
Heel bevel height29 mmest.MediumSide photoRunning Warehouse2026-10-04
Heel bevel height29 mmest.LowSide photoRunning Warehouse2026-10-04

Classes: Manufacturer stated · Externally measured · AI estimated · Derived · User reported. Hover a method for its identifier and algorithm version.

Source notes

  • Running Warehouse: sha256=b23e4e18aef3b63694572be3c8e7c5d68eb0a70e60529bb2dc7c1ca6b80e2a04; 0.3
  • Running Warehouse: sha256=08c94215f54099ba3126109af89e6fe674a993bb7734d291b29f6d44b9e7155a; 0.3
  • Running Warehouse: sha256=26865f9ce2e7f281d078c106174dcec9e464ea1dd5056f1579fa2e01123c65f9; 0.3
  • Running Warehouse: sha256=b3ea7cdf0eaa3ec4f9a85494fbd38af166613513ef9199dd03d03d523bd3568d; 0.3

Shoes with similar geometry

Compare these →

Closest current models from other lines by stack, drop, rocker, toe height, stiffness, firmness, weight and width, whichever both shoes have.

Side profile illustration of the On Cloudboom Strike 2
On
Cloudboom Strike 2
Racing · Carbon plate
Drop
5 mm
Heel
40 mm
Toe rocker
34%

Very close on every shared measure

Side profile illustration of the ASICS Metaspeed Edge Paris
ASICS
Metaspeed Edge Paris
Racing · Carbon plate
Drop
5 mm
Heel
39.5 mm
Toe rocker
33%

vs this shoe: 20 g lighter

Side profile illustration of the ASICS Metaspeed Sky Paris
ASICS
Metaspeed Sky Paris
Racing · Carbon plate
Drop
5 mm
Heel
39.5 mm
Toe rocker
33%

vs this shoe: 20 g lighter

Side profile illustration of the ASICS Magic Speed 5
ASICS
Magic Speed 5
Tempo · Carbon plate
Drop
7 mm
Heel
36 mm
Toe rocker
36%

vs this shoe: 3 mm lower heel