VJ Flow
At a glance
- Heel-to-toe drop
- 10 mmDerived
- Stack, heel / forefoot
- 35 / 25 mmStated
- Weight
- 255 gStatedUK 8
- Plate
- No plate
- Toe rocker
- not measured yet
- Heel bevel
- 11 % of lengthest.photos 10–12 %
- Stiffness / firmness
- not measured yet
- Primary foam
- PerFOAMance (eTPU)
How it compares
- VJ Flow's heel-to-toe drop is 10 mm, higher than the catalogue median of 6 mm (90% of the 179 other current shoes are lower).
- VJ Flow's heel stack is 35 mm, thinner than the catalogue median of 38 mm (23% of the 176 other current shoes are thinner).
- VJ Flow's forefoot stack is 25 mm, thinner than the catalogue median of 31.5 mm (8% of the 171 other current shoes are thinner).
- VJ Flow's weight is 255 g, lighter than the catalogue median of 269 g (34% of the 167 other current shoes are lighter).
- 4 shoes with similar geometry from other lines.
Differences smaller than the precision of the sources (about 1 mm of stack, 8 g, or the spread between photos for photo estimates) are reported as about the same.
Specifications
- Heel-to-toe drop Derived
- 10mmMediumCalculated
- Heel stack Manufacturer stated
- 35mm
- Forefoot stack Manufacturer stated
- 25mm
- Weight Manufacturer stated
- 255g
- Plate
- No plate
- Primary foam
- PerFOAMance (eTPU)
- List price
- $182
Plate, foam and price from VJ Flow.
Geometry
- Toe rocker not measured: typical curve drawn
Percent values are relative to shoe length so they compare across images and sizes; widths in millimetres are lab measurements from the cited source, while toe tip and heel heights in millimetres are photo estimates converted for a men’s US 9 (assumed 300 mm long), so approximate. See how rocker geometry is defined.
- Toe tip over ground AI estimated
- 32mm
2 photos range 30–33 mm; shown is the average of the two that agree most closely.
- Heel bevel length AI estimated
- 11%
2 photos range 10.4–11.7 %; shown is the average of the two that agree most closely.
- Heel bevel height AI estimated
- 23mm
2 photos range 23–24 mm; shown is the average of the two that agree most closely.
How it compares
Appears in:High drop
Wrong value? Missing data? Tell me
Sources
- VJ Flow Trail Running Shoes | VJ ShoesmanufacturerVJ Shoesaccessed 2026-10-04open ↗
- VJ FlowmanufacturerVJaccessed 2026-10-04open ↗
- vj-flow lateral product photoimagevjshoes.com (Shopify, vj-flow-blk product JSON images 1 = lateral, 3 = medial; 2000x2000)accessed 2026-10-04open ↗
- vj-flow medial product photoimagevjshoes.com (Shopify, vj-flow-blk product JSON images 1 = lateral, 3 = medial; 2000x2000)accessed 2026-10-04open ↗
Technical detail: every recorded value, method and version (10)
All approved observations
Every recorded value, including superseded ones. The displayed value per metric is chosen by precedence (measured › stated › derived › AI estimated), then confidence, then recency. 31 further observations awaiting review.
Classes: Manufacturer stated · Externally measured · AI estimated · Derived · User reported. Hover a method for its identifier and algorithm version.
Source notes
- vjshoes.com (Shopify, vj-flow-blk product JSON images 1 = lateral, 3 = medial; 2000x2000): sha256=eebc3c54ef250201abffec9f526f054921af0475abba5c9622e0db67296562d6; 0.3
- vjshoes.com (Shopify, vj-flow-blk product JSON images 1 = lateral, 3 = medial; 2000x2000): sha256=11e713ab26cce1c4176edc035777a0be04e94e4a9c4ea1a5d26906bdf2b78c5f; 0.3
Shoes with similar geometry
Compare these →Closest current models from other lines by stack, drop, rocker, toe height, stiffness, firmness, weight and width, whichever both shoes have.
- Drop
- 10 mm
- Heel
- 38 mm
- Toe rocker
- 30%
vs this shoe: 3 mm higher heel
- Drop
- 8 mm
- Heel
- 37 mm
- Toe rocker
- —
vs this shoe: 2 mm less drop
- Drop
- 8.5 mm
- Heel
- 38 mm
- Toe rocker
- 37%
vs this shoe: 3 mm higher heel
- Drop
- 10 mm
- Heel
- 40 mm
- Toe rocker
- 36%
vs this shoe: 5 mm higher heel