VJ FZN Tempo
At a glance
- Heel-to-toe drop
- 6 mmStated
- Stack, heel / forefoot
- 34 / 28 mmStated
- Weight
- 240 gStatedUK 8.5
- Plate
- Rock plate
- Toe rocker
- 39 % of lengthest.photos 38–39 %
- Heel bevel
- 13 % of lengthest.rough estimate; photos 13–13 %
- Stiffness / firmness
- not measured yet
- Primary foam
- SuperFOAMance+ (nitrogen-infused supercritical foam)
How it compares
- VJ FZN Tempo's heel-to-toe drop is 6 mm, about the catalogue median of 6 mm (25% of the 179 other current shoes are lower).
- VJ FZN Tempo's heel stack is 34 mm, thinner than the catalogue median of 38 mm (18% of the 176 other current shoes are thinner).
- VJ FZN Tempo's forefoot stack is 28 mm, thinner than the catalogue median of 31.5 mm (18% of the 171 other current shoes are thinner).
- VJ FZN Tempo's weight is 240 g, lighter than the catalogue median of 269 g (23% of the 167 other current shoes are lighter).
- 4 shoes with similar geometry from other lines.
Differences smaller than the precision of the sources (about 1 mm of stack, 8 g, or the spread between photos for photo estimates) are reported as about the same.
Specifications
- Heel-to-toe drop Manufacturer stated
- 6mmLowSpec listingbrand figure, reported by NorthernRunner.com Blog - Running Shoe Reviews, Local Running News & Results + More!source
- Heel stack Manufacturer stated
- 34mmLowSpec listingbrand figure, reported by NorthernRunner.com Blog - Running Shoe Reviews, Local Running News & Results + More!source
- Forefoot stack Manufacturer stated
- 28mmLowSpec listingbrand figure, reported by NorthernRunner.com Blog - Running Shoe Reviews, Local Running News & Results + More!source
- Weight Manufacturer stated
- 240g
- Plate
- Rock plate
- Primary foam
- SuperFOAMance+ (nitrogen-infused supercritical foam)
- List price
- $197
Plate, foam and price from VJ FZN Tempo.
Geometry
Percent values are relative to shoe length so they compare across images and sizes; widths in millimetres are lab measurements from the cited source, while toe tip and heel heights in millimetres are photo estimates converted for a men’s US 9 (assumed 300 mm long), so approximate. See how rocker geometry is defined.
- Toe rocker AI estimated
- 39%
2 photos range 38–39 %; shown is their median.
- Rocker radius AI estimated
- 47%
2 photos range 47–50 %; shown is one of the two that agree most closely.
- Rocker angle at toe AI estimated
- 60deg
2 photos range 57–60 deg; shown is one of the two that agree most closely.
- Toe tip over ground AI estimated
- 46mm*
2 photos range 43–48 mm; shown is their median (* the photos disagree by more than usual).
- Visible rocker lift onset AI estimated
- 73.3%
2 photos range 72.9–73.3 %; shown is one of the two that agree most closely.
- Heel bevel length AI estimated
- 13%
2 photos range 12.6–13.5 %; shown is the average of the two that agree most closely.
- Heel bevel height AI estimated
- 22mm
2 photos range 21–23 mm; shown is the average of the two that agree most closely.
How it compares
Appears in:Longer toe rocker
Wrong value? Missing data? Tell me
Sources
- VJ FZN Tempo Review - NorthernRunner.com BlogreviewNorthernRunner.com Blog - Running Shoe Reviews, Local Running News & Results + More!accessed 2026-10-04open ↗
- VJ FZN TempomanufacturerVJaccessed 2026-10-04open ↗
- vj-fzn-tempo medial product photoimagevjshoes.com (Shopify, product JSON images 1 = lateral, 3 = medial; 2000x2000)accessed 2026-10-04open ↗
- vj-fzn-tempo lateral product photoimagevjshoes.com (Shopify, product JSON images 1 = lateral, 3 = medial; 2000x2000)accessed 2026-10-04open ↗
Technical detail: every recorded value, method and version (19)
All approved observations
Every recorded value, including superseded ones. The displayed value per metric is chosen by precedence (measured › stated › derived › AI estimated), then confidence, then recency. 22 further observations awaiting review.
Classes: Manufacturer stated · Externally measured · AI estimated · Derived · User reported. Hover a method for its identifier and algorithm version.
Source notes
- vjshoes.com (Shopify, product JSON images 1 = lateral, 3 = medial; 2000x2000): sha256=9fcabcf9b713f29edf2ccd7456188e5b312b200ea9b15c195d6acde93e5baaed; 0.3
- vjshoes.com (Shopify, product JSON images 1 = lateral, 3 = medial; 2000x2000): sha256=c72c3d58f736794fa9f0e7844e5d8fa0b4efad9fdd347e6bba495cebfc11ce80; 0.3
Shoes with similar geometry
Compare these →Closest current models from other lines by stack, drop, rocker, toe height, stiffness, firmness, weight and width, whichever both shoes have.
- Drop
- 6 mm
- Heel
- 36 mm
- Toe rocker
- 39%
Very close on every shared measure
- Drop
- 5 mm
- Heel
- 37 mm
- Toe rocker
- 38%
vs this shoe: 3 mm higher heel
- Drop
- 6.5 mm
- Heel
- 37 mm
- Toe rocker
- 41%
vs this shoe: 3 mm higher heel
- Drop
- 6 mm
- Heel
- 34 mm
- Toe rocker
- 39%
vs this shoe: 27 g heavier