ShoeGeometry

New Balance FuelCell SuperComp Rebel v1

TempoRoadCarbon composite2026Men'sCurrent

At a glance

Heel-to-toe drop
4 mmStated
Stack, heel / forefoot
40 / 36 mmStated
Weight
218 gStatedsize 9.5
Plate
Carbon composite
Toe rocker
45 % of lengthest.photos 43–46 %
Heel bevel
9.8 % of lengthest.rough estimate; photos 10–12 %
Stiffness / firmness
not measured yet
Primary foam
Infinion (TPEE)

How it compares

  • New Balance FuelCell SuperComp Rebel v1's heel-to-toe drop is 4 mm, lower than the catalogue median of 6 mm (5% of the 179 other current shoes are lower).
  • New Balance FuelCell SuperComp Rebel v1's heel stack is 40 mm, thicker than the catalogue median of 38 mm (62% of the 176 other current shoes are thinner).
  • New Balance FuelCell SuperComp Rebel v1's forefoot stack is 36 mm, thicker than the catalogue median of 31.5 mm (83% of the 171 other current shoes are thinner).
  • New Balance FuelCell SuperComp Rebel v1's weight is 218 g, lighter than the catalogue median of 269 g (12% of the 167 other current shoes are lighter).
  • 4 shoes with similar geometry from other lines.

Differences smaller than the precision of the sources (about 1 mm of stack, 8 g, or the spread between photos for photo estimates) are reported as about the same.

Specifications

Heel-to-toe drop
Manufacturer stated
4mm
MediumSpec listingbrand figure, reported by Doctors of Runningsource
Heel stack
Manufacturer stated
40mm
MediumSpec listingbrand figure, reported by Doctors of Runningsource
Forefoot stack
Manufacturer stated
36mm
MediumSpec listingbrand figure, reported by Doctors of Runningsource
Weight
Manufacturer stated
218g
MediumSpec listingbrand figure, reported by Doctors of Runningsize 9.5source
Plate
Carbon composite
Primary foam
Infinion (TPEE)
List price
$200

Geometry

Catalogue average: heel 38 mm, forefoot 32 mm, toe rocker 34 %New Balance FuelCell SuperComp Rebel v1: heel 40 mm, forefoot 36 mm (drop 4 mm); toe rocker 45 % of length, radius 62 % of length; heel bevel 10 % of length, 18 mm high at the back, ending behind the heel bone (only the back edge is rounded).40 mm36 mmUnder the centre of the heel bone: 12 % of length from the heel, where heel stack is measuredheel boneHeel contact: the sole is within 4.5 mm of the ground from 10 % of length (foam compresses more under load), ending behind the heel bone (only the back edge is rounded)heel bevel 10 %Toe rocker: the front 45 % of the length curves up (the curve leaves the ground 55 % of length from the heel)toe rocker 45 %toeheel
Front: toe rocker shorter longerRear: heel stack lower higher not measured
Dashed: average of the catalogue
Illustrative profile, not a photograph or scan: drawn to scale for a 300 mm shoe from published stack heights and photo estimates of the unloaded shoe (under body weight the foam compresses and the curves flatten). The grey upper is a generic outline, not this shoe’s. New Balance FuelCell SuperComp Rebel v1: heel 40 mm, forefoot 36 mm (drop 4 mm); toe rocker 45 % of length, radius 62 % of length; heel bevel 10 % of length, 18 mm high at the back, ending behind the heel bone (only the back edge is rounded). Heel bone: 12 % of length from the heel, where heel stack is measured. Heel bevel and toe rocker are marked where each curve meets the ground; for the heel that is where the sole comes within 4.5 mm of the ground, which foam compression closes under body weight.

Percent values are relative to shoe length so they compare across images and sizes; widths in millimetres are lab measurements from the cited source, while toe tip and heel heights in millimetres are photo estimates converted for a men’s US 9 (assumed 300 mm long), so approximate. See how rocker geometry is defined.

Toe rocker
AI estimated
45%

4 photos range 43–46 %; shown is their median.

MediumSide photosource
Rocker radius
AI estimated
62%

4 photos range 62–73 %; shown is one of the two that agree most closely.

MediumSide photosource
Rocker rise angle
AI estimated
24deg

4 photos range 22–25 deg; shown is their median.

MediumSide photosource
Toe tip over ground
AI estimated
45mm*

4 photos range 42–48 mm; shown is their median (* the photos disagree by more than usual).

MediumSide photosource
Rocker angle at toe
AI estimated
57deg

4 photos range 54–58 deg; shown is one of the two that agree most closely.

MediumSide photosource
Visible rocker lift onset
AI estimated
68%

4 photos range 68–69.5 %; shown is one of the two that agree most closely.

MediumSide photosource
Toe spring (relative)
AI estimated
20%

4 photos range 18.9–20.7 %; shown is their median.

MediumSide photosource
Heel bevel length
AI estimated
9.8%

4 photos range 9.7–11.9 %; shown is the average of the two that agree most closely.

MediumSide photosource
Heel bevel height
AI estimated
18mm*

4 photos range 18–27 mm; shown is the average of the two that agree most closely (* the photos disagree by more than usual).

MediumSide photosource
Toe box shape
AI estimated
72%

2 photos range 71–73 %; shown is the average of the two that agree most closely.

LowTop photosource

How it compares

Appears in:Low dropCarbon plateLightweightHigh stackLonger toe rocker

Wrong value? Missing data? Tell me
Stored only to improve the site; see privacy.

Sources

  • New Balance SC Rebel Review (2026) - Doctors of RunningreviewDoctors of Runningaccessed 2026-10-04open ↗
  • New Balance SuperComp Rebel v1 Men's Shoes Orange/Sil | Running WarehouseretailerRunning Warehouseaccessed 2026-10-04open ↗
  • new-balance-fuelcell-supercomp-rebel-v1 lateral product photoimageRunning Warehouseaccessed 2026-10-04open ↗
  • new-balance-fuelcell-supercomp-rebel-v1 medial product photoimageRunning Warehouseaccessed 2026-10-04open ↗
  • new-balance-fuelcell-supercomp-rebel-v1 lateral product photoimageRunning Warehouseaccessed 2026-10-04open ↗
  • new-balance-fuelcell-supercomp-rebel-v1 medial product photoimageRunning Warehouseaccessed 2026-10-04open ↗
  • new-balance-fuelcell-supercomp-rebel-v1 sole product photoimageRunning Warehouseaccessed 2026-10-04open ↗
  • new-balance-fuelcell-supercomp-rebel-v1 top product photoimageRunning Warehouseaccessed 2026-10-04open ↗
Technical detail: every recorded value, method and version (26)

All approved observations

Every recorded value, including superseded ones. The displayed value per metric is chosen by precedence (measured › stated › derived › AI estimated), then confidence, then recency. 59 further observations awaiting review.

MetricValueClassConfidenceMethodSourceRecorded
Heel-to-toe drop4 mmStatedMediumSpec listingDoctors of Running2026-10-04
Heel stack40 mmStatedMediumSpec listingDoctors of Running2026-10-04
Heel stack39 mmStatedMediumSpec listingRunning Warehouse2026-10-04
Forefoot stack35 mmStatedMediumSpec listingRunning Warehouse2026-10-04
Forefoot stack36 mmStatedMediumSpec listingDoctors of Running2026-10-04
Weight218 g (size 9.5)StatedMediumSpec listingDoctors of Running2026-10-04
Rocker apex54.2 %est.MediumSide photoRunning Warehouse2026-10-04
Rocker apex53.9 %est.MediumSide photoRunning Warehouse2026-10-04
Rocker radius62 %est.MediumSide photoRunning Warehouse2026-10-04
Rocker radius63 %est.MediumSide photoRunning Warehouse2026-10-04
Rocker rise angle24 degest.MediumSide photoRunning Warehouse2026-10-04
Rocker rise angle24 degest.MediumSide photoRunning Warehouse2026-10-04
Toe tip over ground48 mmest.MediumSide photoRunning Warehouse2026-10-04
Toe tip over ground47 mmest.MediumSide photoRunning Warehouse2026-10-04
Rocker angle at toe58 degest.MediumSide photoRunning Warehouse2026-10-04
Rocker angle at toe57 degest.MediumSide photoRunning Warehouse2026-10-04
Visible rocker lift onset68 %est.MediumSide photoRunning Warehouse2026-10-04
Visible rocker lift onset68 %est.MediumSide photoRunning Warehouse2026-10-04
Toe spring (relative)20.6 %est.MediumSide photoRunning Warehouse2026-10-04
Toe spring (relative)20.7 %est.MediumSide photoRunning Warehouse2026-10-04
Heel bevel length9.9 %est.MediumSide photoRunning Warehouse2026-10-04
Heel bevel length9.7 %est.MediumSide photoRunning Warehouse2026-10-04
Heel bevel height18 mmest.MediumSide photoRunning Warehouse2026-10-04
Heel bevel height18 mmest.MediumSide photoRunning Warehouse2026-10-04
Toe box shape73 %est.LowTop photoRunning Warehouse2026-10-04
Toe box shape71 %est.LowTop photoRunning Warehouse2026-10-04

Classes: Manufacturer stated · Externally measured · AI estimated · Derived · User reported. Hover a method for its identifier and algorithm version.

Source notes

  • Running Warehouse: sha256=e07e51004dee5f0b4f2bfe1ae2f293feacde72eb78662ac0becee848203fde67; 0.3
  • Running Warehouse: sha256=60d10fb6dfaffa5cd84e920e2c18708fe28b458531e43df4b90fd073882e88f8; 0.3
  • Running Warehouse: sha256=8e64d80c1fa968b2c561ba49131473371bd4ccfa84f53b43dce5692d9ae482e0; 0.3
  • Running Warehouse: sha256=521e38aa492444f7d4f10bc4c79fb7e822413b0041c46290f6fd916835f019e9; 0.3
  • Running Warehouse: sha256=6e158f39467eef6a6a4b042e60d4659ba284f5303268c0b357be9db0e6d73804; 0.1
  • Running Warehouse: sha256=a2d5f3d51752883d0644275e3d1fb05c7ee52eeb58cffe70abc2989cdb1692eb; 0.1

Shoes with similar geometry

Compare these →

Closest current models from other lines by stack, drop, rocker, toe height, stiffness, firmness, weight and width, whichever both shoes have.

Side profile illustration of the Adidas Adizero Evo SL
Adidas
Adizero Evo SL
Tempo · No plate
Drop
6.5 mm
Heel
37 mm
Toe rocker
41%

vs this shoe: 3 mm more drop · 3 mm lower heel

Side profile illustration of the VJ FZN Aerofly
VJ
FZN Aerofly
Road/trail hybrid · Rock plate
Drop
8 mm
Heel
38 mm
Toe rocker
—

vs this shoe: 4 mm more drop · 27 g heavier

Side profile illustration of the Hoka Rocket X 3
Hoka
Rocket X 3
Racing · Carbon plate
Drop
7 mm
Heel
40 mm
Toe rocker
39%

vs this shoe: shorter toe rocker · 3 mm more drop

Side profile illustration of the Brooks Hyperion Elite 6
Brooks
Hyperion Elite 6
Racing · Carbon plate
Drop
7 mm
Heel
40 mm
Toe rocker
40%

vs this shoe: 3 mm more drop · 25 g lighter