ShoeGeometry

Nike Winflo 12

Daily trainerRoadNo plate2026Men'sCurrent

At a glance

Heel-to-toe drop
12.5 mmMeasured
Stack, heel / forefoot
44.3 / ? mmMeasuredforefoot not measured yet
Weight
297 gMeasured
Plate
No plate
Toe rocker
not measured yet
Heel bevel
not measured yet
Stiffness / firmness
29 / 30 of 100Derived
Primary foam
Cushlon 3.0 with Air unit

How it compares

  • Nike Winflo 12's heel-to-toe drop is 12.5 mm, higher than the catalogue median of 6 mm (100% of the 179 other current shoes are lower).
  • Nike Winflo 12's heel stack is 44.3 mm, thicker than the catalogue median of 38 mm (89% of the 176 other current shoes are thinner).
  • Nike Winflo 12's weight is 297 g, heavier than the catalogue median of 269 g (80% of the 167 other current shoes are lighter).
  • 4 shoes with similar geometry from other lines.

Differences smaller than the precision of the sources (about 1 mm of stack, 8 g, or the spread between photos for photo estimates) are reported as about the same.

Specifications

Heel-to-toe drop
Externally measured
12.5mm
HighSpec listingsource
Heel stack
Externally measured
44.3mm
HighSpec listingsource
Forefoot stack
No approved value yet.
Weight
Externally measured
297g
HighSpec listingsource
Plate
No plate
Primary foam
Cushlon 3.0 with Air unit
List price
$110

Geometry

Catalogue average: heel 38 mm, forefoot 32 mm, toe rocker 35 %Nike Winflo 12: heel 44 mm, forefoot 32 mm (drop 13 mm); toe rocker not measured, typical shape drawn.44 mm32 mmtoeheel
Front: toe rocker shorter longerRear: heel stack lower higher not measured
Dashed: average of the catalogue
  • Toe rocker not measured: typical curve drawn
  • Heel bevel not measured: generic rounding drawn
Illustrative profile, not a photograph or scan: drawn to scale for a 300 mm shoe from published stack heights and photo estimates of the unloaded shoe (under body weight the foam compresses and the curves flatten). The grey upper is a generic outline, not this shoe’s. Nike Winflo 12: heel 44 mm, forefoot 32 mm (drop 13 mm); toe rocker not measured, typical shape drawn. Dashed midsole: typical values stand in for what this shoe has no measurement of.

Percent values are relative to shoe length so they compare across images and sizes; widths in millimetres are lab measurements from the cited source, while toe tip and heel heights in millimetres are photo estimates converted for a men’s US 9 (assumed 300 mm long), so approximate. See how rocker geometry is defined.

Midsole width (forefoot)
Externally measured
122.2mm
MediumLab testsource
Midsole width (heel)
Externally measured
104.4mm
MediumLab testsource
Interior forefoot width
Externally measured
98mm
MediumLab testsource
Toebox width
Externally measured
72.6mm
MediumLab testsource

Stiffness

Longitudinal stiffness
Derived
29/ 100

Lab reading: 13.5 N, force to bend the shoe 30° (lab bending test); the score is our 0–100 rescaling of it.

MediumLab flex testsource
Midsole firmness
Derived
30/ 100

Lab reading: 28.3 Asker C, midsole durometer reading (higher = firmer); the score is our 0–100 rescaling of it.

MediumLab durometersource

How it compares

Appears in:High dropWide platform

Wrong value? Missing data? Tell me
Stored only to improve the site; see privacy.

Sources

  • Nike Winflo 12 Review - RTINGS.comlabRTINGSaccessed 2026-10-04open ↗
  • Cut in half: Nike Winflo 12 Review (2026) | RunRepeatlabRunRepeataccessed 2026-10-04open ↗
Technical detail: every recorded value, method and version (10)

All approved observations

Every recorded value, including superseded ones. The displayed value per metric is chosen by precedence (measured › stated › derived › AI estimated), then confidence, then recency.

MetricValueClassConfidenceMethodSourceRecorded
Heel-to-toe drop12 mmMeasuredLowSpec listingRTINGS2026-10-04
Heel-to-toe drop12.5 mmMeasuredHighSpec listingRTINGS2026-10-04
Heel stack44.3 mmMeasuredHighSpec listingRTINGS2026-10-04
Weight297 gMeasuredHighSpec listingRTINGS2026-10-04
Midsole width (forefoot)122.2 mmMeasuredMediumLab testRunRepeat2026-10-04
Midsole width (heel)104.4 mmMeasuredMediumLab testRunRepeat2026-10-04
Interior forefoot width98 mmMeasuredMediumLab testRunRepeat2026-10-04
Toebox width72.6 mmMeasuredMediumLab testRunRepeat2026-10-04
Longitudinal stiffness29 DerivedMediumLab flex testRunRepeat2026-10-04
Midsole firmness30 DerivedMediumLab durometerRunRepeat2026-10-04

Classes: Manufacturer stated · Externally measured · AI estimated · Derived · User reported. Hover a method for its identifier and algorithm version.

Shoes with similar geometry

Compare these →

Closest current models from other lines by stack, drop, rocker, toe height, stiffness, firmness, weight and width, whichever both shoes have.

Side profile illustration of the Nike Vomero 18
Nike
Vomero 18
Max cushion · No plate
Drop
10 mm
Heel
46 mm
Toe rocker
39%

vs this shoe: 28 g heavier · 3 mm less drop · 6 mm narrower base

Side profile illustration of the Nike Structure Plus
Nike
Structure Plus
Stability · No plate
Drop
10 mm
Heel
42 mm
Toe rocker
33%

vs this shoe: stiffer · 3 mm less drop

Side profile illustration of the Nike Vomero Plus
Nike
Vomero Plus
Max cushion · No plate
Drop
10 mm
Heel
45 mm
Toe rocker
30%

vs this shoe: stiffer · 3 mm less drop · 5 mm narrower base

Side profile illustration of the Mizuno Wave Inspire 22
Mizuno
Wave Inspire 22
Stability · TPU plate
Drop
10 mm
Heel
37 mm
Toe rocker
30%

vs this shoe: 7 mm lower heel · 3 mm less drop · 6 mm narrower base