ASICS Metaspeed Edge Tokyo
At a glance
- Heel-to-toe drop
- 5 mmDerived
- Stack, heel / forefoot
- 40 / 35 mmStated
- Weight
- 159 gStated
- Plate
- Carbon plate
- Toe rocker
- 35 % of lengthest.photos 31–35 %
- Heel bevel
- 9.3 % of lengthest.photos 9–56 %
- Stiffness / firmness
- 41 / 15 of 100Derived
- Primary foam
- FF Leap + FF Turbo Plus
How it compares
- ASICS Metaspeed Edge Tokyo's heel-to-toe drop is 5 mm, lower than the catalogue median of 6 mm (14% of the 179 other current shoes are lower).
- ASICS Metaspeed Edge Tokyo's heel stack is 40 mm, thicker than the catalogue median of 38 mm (62% of the 176 other current shoes are thinner).
- ASICS Metaspeed Edge Tokyo's forefoot stack is 35 mm, thicker than the catalogue median of 31.5 mm (76% of the 171 other current shoes are thinner).
- ASICS Metaspeed Edge Tokyo's weight is 159 g, lighter than the catalogue median of 269 g (1% of the 167 other current shoes are lighter).
- 4 shoes with similar geometry from other lines.
Differences smaller than the precision of the sources (about 1 mm of stack, 8 g, or the spread between photos for photo estimates) are reported as about the same.
Specifications
- Heel-to-toe drop Derived
- 5mmMediumCalculated
- Heel stack Manufacturer stated
- 40mm
- Forefoot stack Manufacturer stated
- 35mm
- Weight Manufacturer stated
- 159g
- Plate
- Carbon plate
- Primary foam
- FF Leap + FF Turbo Plus
- List price
- $270
Geometry
Percent values are relative to shoe length so they compare across images and sizes; widths in millimetres are lab measurements from the cited source, while toe tip and heel heights in millimetres are photo estimates converted for a men’s US 9 (assumed 300 mm long), so approximate. See how rocker geometry is defined.
- Toe rocker AI estimated
- 35%
4 photos range 31–35 %; shown is one of the two that agree most closely.
- Rocker radius AI estimated
- 37%
4 photos range 33–39 %; shown is one of the two that agree most closely.
- Rocker rise angle AI estimated
- 33deg
4 photos range 32–36 deg; shown is one of the two that agree most closely.
- Toe tip over ground AI estimated
- 42mm*
4 photos range 41–53 mm; shown is the average of the two that agree most closely (* the photos disagree by more than usual).
- Rocker angle at toe AI estimated
- 64deg
4 photos range 62–64 deg; shown is one of the two that agree most closely.
- Visible rocker lift onset AI estimated
- 75.7%
4 photos range 75.7–79.4 %; shown is one of the two that agree most closely.
- Toe spring (relative) AI estimated
- 21%
4 photos range 20.2–25 %; shown is one of the two that agree most closely.
- Heel bevel length AI estimated
- 9.3%*
4 photos range 8.8–55.5 %; shown is the average of the two that agree most closely (* the photos disagree by more than usual).
- Heel bevel height AI estimated
- 38mm
4 photos range 36–39 mm; shown is the average of the two that agree most closely.
- Midsole width (forefoot) Externally measured
- 108mm
- Midsole width (heel) Externally measured
- 75mm
- Toe box shape AI estimated
- 72%
2 photos range 72–72 %; shown is the average of the two that agree most closely.
- Interior forefoot width Externally measured
- 89.4mm
- Toebox width Externally measured
- 73mm
Stiffness
- Longitudinal stiffness Derived
- 41/ 100
Lab reading: 15.8 N, force to bend the shoe 30° (lab bending test); the score is our 0–100 rescaling of it.
- Midsole firmness Derived
- 15/ 100
Lab reading: 24.5 Asker C, midsole durometer reading (higher = firmer); the score is our 0–100 rescaling of it.
How it compares
Appears in:Carbon plateLightweightHigh stackLonger toe rocker
Compare:ASICS Metaspeed Edge Tokyo vs On Cloudboom Strike 2ASICS Metaspeed Edge Tokyo vs Altra Vanish Carbon 3
Wrong value? Missing data? Tell me
Sources
- ASICS METASPEED Edge Tokyo Unisex Shoes Flash Red/Black | Running WarehouseretailerRunning Warehouseaccessed 2026-10-04open ↗
- asics-metaspeed-edge-tokyo lateral product photoimageRunning Warehouseaccessed 2026-10-04open ↗
- asics-metaspeed-edge-tokyo medial product photoimageRunning Warehouseaccessed 2026-10-04open ↗
- asics-metaspeed-edge-tokyo lateral product photoimageRunning Warehouseaccessed 2026-10-04open ↗
- asics-metaspeed-edge-tokyo medial product photoimageRunning Warehouseaccessed 2026-10-04open ↗
- Cut in half: ASICS Metaspeed Edge Tokyo Review (2025) | RunRepeatlabRunRepeataccessed 2026-10-04open ↗
- asics-metaspeed-edge-tokyo sole product photoimageRunning Warehouseaccessed 2026-10-04open ↗
- asics-metaspeed-edge-tokyo top product photoimageRunning Warehouseaccessed 2026-10-04open ↗
Technical detail: every recorded value, method and version (30)
All approved observations
Every recorded value, including superseded ones. The displayed value per metric is chosen by precedence (measured › stated › derived › AI estimated), then confidence, then recency. 58 further observations awaiting review.
| Metric | Value | Class | Confidence | Method | Source | Recorded |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Heel-to-toe drop | 5 mm | Derived | Medium | Calculated | — | 2026-10-04 |
| Heel stack | 40 mm | Stated | Medium | Spec listing | Running Warehouse | 2026-10-04 |
| Forefoot stack | 35 mm | Stated | Medium | Spec listing | Running Warehouse | 2026-10-04 |
| Weight | 159 g | Stated | Medium | Spec listing | Running Warehouse | 2026-10-04 |
| Rocker apex | 65.7 % | est. | Low | Side photo | Running Warehouse | 2026-10-04 |
| Rocker apex | 64.9 % | est. | Low | Side photo | Running Warehouse | 2026-10-04 |
| Rocker radius | 37 % | est. | Low | Side photo | Running Warehouse | 2026-10-04 |
| Rocker radius | 36 % | est. | Low | Side photo | Running Warehouse | 2026-10-04 |
| Rocker rise angle | 33 deg | est. | Low | Side photo | Running Warehouse | 2026-10-04 |
| Rocker rise angle | 33 deg | est. | Low | Side photo | Running Warehouse | 2026-10-04 |
| Toe tip over ground | 44 mm | est. | Low | Side photo | Running Warehouse | 2026-10-04 |
| Rocker angle at toe | 64 deg | est. | Low | Side photo | Running Warehouse | 2026-10-04 |
| Rocker angle at toe | 64 deg | est. | Low | Side photo | Running Warehouse | 2026-10-04 |
| Toe tip over ground | 41 mm | est. | Low | Side photo | Running Warehouse | 2026-10-04 |
| Visible rocker lift onset | 75.7 % | est. | Low | Side photo | Running Warehouse | 2026-10-04 |
| Visible rocker lift onset | 75.7 % | est. | Low | Side photo | Running Warehouse | 2026-10-04 |
| Toe spring (relative) | 21 % | est. | Low | Side photo | Running Warehouse | 2026-10-04 |
| Toe spring (relative) | 21.5 % | est. | Low | Side photo | Running Warehouse | 2026-10-04 |
| Heel bevel length | 8.8 % | est. | Low | Side photo | Running Warehouse | 2026-10-04 |
| Heel bevel length | 9.7 % | est. | Low | Side photo | Running Warehouse | 2026-10-04 |
| Heel bevel height | 39 mm | est. | Low | Side photo | Running Warehouse | 2026-10-04 |
| Heel bevel height | 38 mm | est. | Low | Side photo | Running Warehouse | 2026-10-04 |
| Midsole width (forefoot) | 108 mm | Measured | Medium | Lab test | RunRepeat | 2026-10-04 |
| Midsole width (heel) | 75 mm | Measured | Medium | Lab test | RunRepeat | 2026-10-04 |
| Toe box shape | 72 % | est. | Low | Top photo | Running Warehouse | 2026-10-04 |
| Toe box shape | 72 % | est. | Low | Top photo | Running Warehouse | 2026-10-04 |
| Interior forefoot width | 89.4 mm | Measured | Medium | Lab test | RunRepeat | 2026-10-04 |
| Toebox width | 73 mm | Measured | Medium | Lab test | RunRepeat | 2026-10-04 |
| Longitudinal stiffness | 41 | Derived | Medium | Lab flex test | RunRepeat | 2026-10-04 |
| Midsole firmness | 15 | Derived | Medium | Lab durometer | RunRepeat | 2026-10-04 |
Classes: Manufacturer stated · Externally measured · AI estimated · Derived · User reported. Hover a method for its identifier and algorithm version.
Source notes
- Running Warehouse: sha256=77a39c120470d2f56b941793148e108373ee026f4808395520a97a0d1c18a61d; 0.3
- Running Warehouse: sha256=e22499ef23e6a7514bc66717fdc9b642f4e87cf5e66a8af8dc44d4278eb94493; 0.3
- Running Warehouse: sha256=2e079aec2c7586d0821fd24866bf09b18b3080e0a710cdc0d7fddb0ee5bda662; 0.3
- Running Warehouse: sha256=a2dac972751a41faae3e187a3fd47ee6dc9fc1817ecfc4abe900bf9db37c91e6; 0.3
- Running Warehouse: sha256=160f1f8eb7f26e09c488a61de00580aa0732cbd0cbb7ec2c01c118ab2f29100e; 0.1
- Running Warehouse: sha256=1a322742403c23f3df2c0e999b72cbc18ce8af6636451bdc67e2deada454a50b; 0.1
Shoes with similar geometry
Compare these →Closest current models from other lines by stack, drop, rocker, toe height, stiffness, firmness, weight and width, whichever both shoes have.
- Drop
- 6 mm
- Heel
- 40.5 mm
- Toe rocker
- 38%
Very close on every shared measure
- Drop
- 6.9 mm
- Heel
- 42 mm
- Toe rocker
- 33%
vs this shoe: 22 g heavier
- Drop
- 8 mm
- Heel
- 39 mm
- Toe rocker
- 36%
vs this shoe: 3 mm more drop · 29 g heavier
- Drop
- 5 mm
- Heel
- 40 mm
- Toe rocker
- 33%
vs this shoe: 39 g heavier