ShoeGeometry

ASICS Metaspeed Edge Tokyo

RacingRoadCarbon plate2025Men'sCurrent

At a glance

Heel-to-toe drop
5 mmDerived
Stack, heel / forefoot
40 / 35 mmStated
Weight
159 gStated
Plate
Carbon plate
Toe rocker
35 % of lengthest.photos 31–35 %
Heel bevel
9.3 % of lengthest.photos 9–56 %
Stiffness / firmness
41 / 15 of 100Derived
Primary foam
FF Leap + FF Turbo Plus

How it compares

  • ASICS Metaspeed Edge Tokyo's heel-to-toe drop is 5 mm, lower than the catalogue median of 6 mm (14% of the 179 other current shoes are lower).
  • ASICS Metaspeed Edge Tokyo's heel stack is 40 mm, thicker than the catalogue median of 38 mm (62% of the 176 other current shoes are thinner).
  • ASICS Metaspeed Edge Tokyo's forefoot stack is 35 mm, thicker than the catalogue median of 31.5 mm (76% of the 171 other current shoes are thinner).
  • ASICS Metaspeed Edge Tokyo's weight is 159 g, lighter than the catalogue median of 269 g (1% of the 167 other current shoes are lighter).
  • 4 shoes with similar geometry from other lines.

Differences smaller than the precision of the sources (about 1 mm of stack, 8 g, or the spread between photos for photo estimates) are reported as about the same.

Specifications

Heel-to-toe drop
Derived
5mm
MediumCalculated
Heel stack
Manufacturer stated
40mm
MediumSpec listingbrand figure, reported by Running Warehousesource
Forefoot stack
Manufacturer stated
35mm
MediumSpec listingbrand figure, reported by Running Warehousesource
Weight
Manufacturer stated
159g
MediumSpec listingbrand figure, reported by Running Warehousesource
Plate
Carbon plate
Primary foam
FF Leap + FF Turbo Plus
List price
$270

Geometry

Catalogue average: heel 38 mm, forefoot 32 mm, toe rocker 35 %ASICS Metaspeed Edge Tokyo: heel 40 mm, forefoot 35 mm (drop 5 mm); toe rocker 35 % of length, radius 37 % of length; heel bevel 9 % of length, 38 mm high at the back, ending behind the heel bone (only the back edge is rounded).40 mm35 mmUnder the centre of the heel bone: 12 % of length from the heel, where heel stack is measuredheel boneHeel contact: the sole is within 4.5 mm of the ground from 9 % of length (foam compresses more under load), ending behind the heel bone (only the back edge is rounded)heel bevel 9 %Toe rocker: the front 35 % of the length curves up (the curve leaves the ground 65 % of length from the heel)toe rocker 35 %toeheel
Front: toe rocker shorter longerRear: heel stack lower higher not measured
Dashed: average of the catalogue
Illustrative profile, not a photograph or scan: drawn to scale for a 300 mm shoe from published stack heights and photo estimates of the unloaded shoe (under body weight the foam compresses and the curves flatten). The grey upper is a generic outline, not this shoe’s. ASICS Metaspeed Edge Tokyo: heel 40 mm, forefoot 35 mm (drop 5 mm); toe rocker 35 % of length, radius 37 % of length; heel bevel 9 % of length, 38 mm high at the back, ending behind the heel bone (only the back edge is rounded). Heel bone: 12 % of length from the heel, where heel stack is measured. Heel bevel and toe rocker are marked where each curve meets the ground; for the heel that is where the sole comes within 4.5 mm of the ground, which foam compression closes under body weight.

Percent values are relative to shoe length so they compare across images and sizes; widths in millimetres are lab measurements from the cited source, while toe tip and heel heights in millimetres are photo estimates converted for a men’s US 9 (assumed 300 mm long), so approximate. See how rocker geometry is defined.

Toe rocker
AI estimated
35%

4 photos range 31–35 %; shown is one of the two that agree most closely.

LowSide photosource
Rocker radius
AI estimated
37%

4 photos range 33–39 %; shown is one of the two that agree most closely.

LowSide photosource
Rocker rise angle
AI estimated
33deg

4 photos range 32–36 deg; shown is one of the two that agree most closely.

LowSide photosource
Toe tip over ground
AI estimated
42mm*

4 photos range 41–53 mm; shown is the average of the two that agree most closely (* the photos disagree by more than usual).

LowSide photosource
Rocker angle at toe
AI estimated
64deg

4 photos range 62–64 deg; shown is one of the two that agree most closely.

LowSide photosource
Visible rocker lift onset
AI estimated
75.7%

4 photos range 75.7–79.4 %; shown is one of the two that agree most closely.

LowSide photosource
Toe spring (relative)
AI estimated
21%

4 photos range 20.2–25 %; shown is one of the two that agree most closely.

LowSide photosource
Heel bevel length
AI estimated
9.3%*

4 photos range 8.8–55.5 %; shown is the average of the two that agree most closely (* the photos disagree by more than usual).

LowSide photosource
Heel bevel height
AI estimated
38mm

4 photos range 36–39 mm; shown is the average of the two that agree most closely.

LowSide photosource
Midsole width (forefoot)
Externally measured
108mm
MediumLab testsource
Midsole width (heel)
Externally measured
75mm
MediumLab testsource
Toe box shape
AI estimated
72%

2 photos range 72–72 %; shown is the average of the two that agree most closely.

LowTop photosource
Interior forefoot width
Externally measured
89.4mm
MediumLab testsource
Toebox width
Externally measured
73mm
MediumLab testsource

Stiffness

Longitudinal stiffness
Derived
41/ 100

Lab reading: 15.8 N, force to bend the shoe 30° (lab bending test); the score is our 0–100 rescaling of it.

MediumLab flex testsource
Midsole firmness
Derived
15/ 100

Lab reading: 24.5 Asker C, midsole durometer reading (higher = firmer); the score is our 0–100 rescaling of it.

MediumLab durometersource

How it compares

Appears in:Carbon plateLightweightHigh stackLonger toe rocker

Compare:ASICS Metaspeed Edge Tokyo vs On Cloudboom Strike 2ASICS Metaspeed Edge Tokyo vs Altra Vanish Carbon 3

Wrong value? Missing data? Tell me
Stored only to improve the site; see privacy.

Sources

  • ASICS METASPEED Edge Tokyo Unisex Shoes Flash Red/Black | Running WarehouseretailerRunning Warehouseaccessed 2026-10-04open ↗
  • asics-metaspeed-edge-tokyo lateral product photoimageRunning Warehouseaccessed 2026-10-04open ↗
  • asics-metaspeed-edge-tokyo medial product photoimageRunning Warehouseaccessed 2026-10-04open ↗
  • asics-metaspeed-edge-tokyo lateral product photoimageRunning Warehouseaccessed 2026-10-04open ↗
  • asics-metaspeed-edge-tokyo medial product photoimageRunning Warehouseaccessed 2026-10-04open ↗
  • Cut in half: ASICS Metaspeed Edge Tokyo Review (2025) | RunRepeatlabRunRepeataccessed 2026-10-04open ↗
  • asics-metaspeed-edge-tokyo sole product photoimageRunning Warehouseaccessed 2026-10-04open ↗
  • asics-metaspeed-edge-tokyo top product photoimageRunning Warehouseaccessed 2026-10-04open ↗
Technical detail: every recorded value, method and version (30)

All approved observations

Every recorded value, including superseded ones. The displayed value per metric is chosen by precedence (measured › stated › derived › AI estimated), then confidence, then recency. 58 further observations awaiting review.

MetricValueClassConfidenceMethodSourceRecorded
Heel-to-toe drop5 mmDerivedMediumCalculated—2026-10-04
Heel stack40 mmStatedMediumSpec listingRunning Warehouse2026-10-04
Forefoot stack35 mmStatedMediumSpec listingRunning Warehouse2026-10-04
Weight159 gStatedMediumSpec listingRunning Warehouse2026-10-04
Rocker apex65.7 %est.LowSide photoRunning Warehouse2026-10-04
Rocker apex64.9 %est.LowSide photoRunning Warehouse2026-10-04
Rocker radius37 %est.LowSide photoRunning Warehouse2026-10-04
Rocker radius36 %est.LowSide photoRunning Warehouse2026-10-04
Rocker rise angle33 degest.LowSide photoRunning Warehouse2026-10-04
Rocker rise angle33 degest.LowSide photoRunning Warehouse2026-10-04
Toe tip over ground44 mmest.LowSide photoRunning Warehouse2026-10-04
Rocker angle at toe64 degest.LowSide photoRunning Warehouse2026-10-04
Rocker angle at toe64 degest.LowSide photoRunning Warehouse2026-10-04
Toe tip over ground41 mmest.LowSide photoRunning Warehouse2026-10-04
Visible rocker lift onset75.7 %est.LowSide photoRunning Warehouse2026-10-04
Visible rocker lift onset75.7 %est.LowSide photoRunning Warehouse2026-10-04
Toe spring (relative)21 %est.LowSide photoRunning Warehouse2026-10-04
Toe spring (relative)21.5 %est.LowSide photoRunning Warehouse2026-10-04
Heel bevel length8.8 %est.LowSide photoRunning Warehouse2026-10-04
Heel bevel length9.7 %est.LowSide photoRunning Warehouse2026-10-04
Heel bevel height39 mmest.LowSide photoRunning Warehouse2026-10-04
Heel bevel height38 mmest.LowSide photoRunning Warehouse2026-10-04
Midsole width (forefoot)108 mmMeasuredMediumLab testRunRepeat2026-10-04
Midsole width (heel)75 mmMeasuredMediumLab testRunRepeat2026-10-04
Toe box shape72 %est.LowTop photoRunning Warehouse2026-10-04
Toe box shape72 %est.LowTop photoRunning Warehouse2026-10-04
Interior forefoot width89.4 mmMeasuredMediumLab testRunRepeat2026-10-04
Toebox width73 mmMeasuredMediumLab testRunRepeat2026-10-04
Longitudinal stiffness41 DerivedMediumLab flex testRunRepeat2026-10-04
Midsole firmness15 DerivedMediumLab durometerRunRepeat2026-10-04

Classes: Manufacturer stated · Externally measured · AI estimated · Derived · User reported. Hover a method for its identifier and algorithm version.

Source notes

  • Running Warehouse: sha256=77a39c120470d2f56b941793148e108373ee026f4808395520a97a0d1c18a61d; 0.3
  • Running Warehouse: sha256=e22499ef23e6a7514bc66717fdc9b642f4e87cf5e66a8af8dc44d4278eb94493; 0.3
  • Running Warehouse: sha256=2e079aec2c7586d0821fd24866bf09b18b3080e0a710cdc0d7fddb0ee5bda662; 0.3
  • Running Warehouse: sha256=a2dac972751a41faae3e187a3fd47ee6dc9fc1817ecfc4abe900bf9db37c91e6; 0.3
  • Running Warehouse: sha256=160f1f8eb7f26e09c488a61de00580aa0732cbd0cbb7ec2c01c118ab2f29100e; 0.1
  • Running Warehouse: sha256=1a322742403c23f3df2c0e999b72cbc18ce8af6636451bdc67e2deada454a50b; 0.1
Compare these →

Closest current models from other lines by stack, drop, rocker, toe height, stiffness, firmness, weight and width, whichever both shoes have.