Hoka Skyward X 2
At a glance
- Heel-to-toe drop
- 5 mmDerived
- Stack, heel / forefoot
- 48 / 43 mmStated
- Weight
- 298 gStatedUS M10.5
- Plate
- Carbon plate
- Toe rocker
- 35 % of lengthest.photos 31–36 %
- Heel bevel
- 12 % of lengthest.photos 10–14 %
- Stiffness / firmness
- 79 / 44 of 100Derived
- Primary foam
- PEBA top layer + supercritical EVA base
How it compares
- Hoka Skyward X 2's heel-to-toe drop is 5 mm, lower than the catalogue median of 6 mm (14% of the 179 other current shoes are lower).
- Hoka Skyward X 2's heel stack is 48 mm, thicker than the catalogue median of 38 mm (99% of the 176 other current shoes are thinner).
- Hoka Skyward X 2's forefoot stack is 43 mm, thicker than the catalogue median of 31.5 mm (99% of the 171 other current shoes are thinner).
- Hoka Skyward X 2's weight is 298 g, heavier than the catalogue median of 269 g (80% of the 167 other current shoes are lighter).
- 4 shoes with similar geometry from other lines.
Differences smaller than the precision of the sources (about 1 mm of stack, 8 g, or the spread between photos for photo estimates) are reported as about the same.
Specifications
- Heel-to-toe drop Derived
- 5mmMediumCalculated
- Heel stack Manufacturer stated
- 48mm
- Forefoot stack Manufacturer stated
- 43mm
- Weight Manufacturer stated
- 298g
- Plate
- Carbon plate
- Primary foam
- PEBA top layer + supercritical EVA base
- List price
- $225
Geometry
Percent values are relative to shoe length so they compare across images and sizes; widths in millimetres are lab measurements from the cited source, while toe tip and heel heights in millimetres are photo estimates converted for a men’s US 9 (assumed 300 mm long), so approximate. See how rocker geometry is defined.
- Toe rocker AI estimated
- 35%
4 photos range 31–36 %; shown is one of the two that agree most closely.
- Rocker radius AI estimated
- 40%
4 photos range 36–41 %; shown is one of the two that agree most closely.
- Rocker rise angle AI estimated
- 33deg
4 photos range 28–33 deg; shown is one of the two that agree most closely.
- Toe tip over ground AI estimated
- 46mm*
4 photos range 41–47 mm; shown is the average of the two that agree most closely (* the photos disagree by more than usual).
- Rocker angle at toe AI estimated
- 66deg
4 photos range 52–67 deg; shown is one of the two that agree most closely.
- Visible rocker lift onset AI estimated
- 75.2%
4 photos range 74.9–78.4 %; shown is one of the two that agree most closely.
- Toe spring (relative) AI estimated
- 22.6%
4 photos range 16.6–22.7 %; shown is one of the two that agree most closely.
- Heel bevel length AI estimated
- 12%*
4 photos range 10.2–14.4 %; shown is the average of the two that agree most closely (* the photos disagree by more than usual).
- Heel bevel height AI estimated
- 25mm*
4 photos range 20–25 mm; shown is the average of the two that agree most closely (* the photos disagree by more than usual).
- Midsole width (forefoot) Externally measured
- 125.7mm
- Midsole width (heel) Externally measured
- 103.7mm
- Toe box shape AI estimated
- 74%
2 photos range 73–76 %; shown is the average of the two that agree most closely.
- Interior forefoot width Externally measured
- 94.6mm
- Toebox width Externally measured
- 72.7mm
Stiffness
- Longitudinal stiffness Derived
- 79/ 100
Lab reading: 23.0 N, force to bend the shoe 30° (lab bending test); the score is our 0–100 rescaling of it.
- Midsole firmness Derived
- 44/ 100
Lab reading: 31.9 Asker C, midsole durometer reading (higher = firmer); the score is our 0–100 rescaling of it.
How it compares
Appears in:Carbon plateMax cushionHigh stackWide platformLonger toe rocker
Wrong value? Missing data? Tell me
Sources
- HOKA Skyward X 2 Men's Shoes Carbon Black/Neon Nebula | Running WarehouseretailerRunning Warehouseaccessed 2026-10-04open ↗
- The Hoka Skyward X 2 Proves Less Stack Can Be An Upgrade | Believe in the RunreviewBelieve in the Runaccessed 2026-10-04open ↗
- hoka-skyward-x-2 medial product photoimageRunning Warehouseaccessed 2026-10-04open ↗
- hoka-skyward-x-2 medial product photoimageRunning Warehouseaccessed 2026-10-04open ↗
- hoka-skyward-x-2 lateral product photoimageRunning Warehouseaccessed 2026-10-04open ↗
- hoka-skyward-x-2 lateral product photoimageRunning Warehouseaccessed 2026-10-04open ↗
- Cut in half: HOKA Skyward X 2 Review (2026) | RunRepeatlabRunRepeataccessed 2026-10-04open ↗
- hoka-skyward-x-2 sole product photoimageRunning Warehouseaccessed 2026-10-04open ↗
- hoka-skyward-x-2 top product photoimageRunning Warehouseaccessed 2026-10-04open ↗
Technical detail: every recorded value, method and version (32)
All approved observations
Every recorded value, including superseded ones. The displayed value per metric is chosen by precedence (measured › stated › derived › AI estimated), then confidence, then recency. 59 further observations awaiting review.
| Metric | Value | Class | Confidence | Method | Source | Recorded |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Heel-to-toe drop | 5 mm | Derived | Medium | Calculated | — | 2026-10-04 |
| Heel stack | 49 mm | Stated | Medium | Spec listing | Running Warehouse | 2026-10-04 |
| Heel stack | 48 mm | Stated | Medium | Spec listing | Believe in the Run | 2026-10-04 |
| Forefoot stack | 44 mm | Stated | Medium | Spec listing | Running Warehouse | 2026-10-04 |
| Forefoot stack | 43 mm | Stated | Medium | Spec listing | Believe in the Run | 2026-10-04 |
| Weight | 298 g (US M10.5) | Stated | Medium | Spec listing | Believe in the Run | 2026-10-04 |
| Rocker apex | 64.2 % | est. | Low | Side photo | Running Warehouse | 2026-10-04 |
| Rocker apex | 64.6 % | est. | Medium | Side photo | Running Warehouse | 2026-10-04 |
| Rocker radius | 40 % | est. | Low | Side photo | Running Warehouse | 2026-10-04 |
| Rocker radius | 40 % | est. | Medium | Side photo | Running Warehouse | 2026-10-04 |
| Rocker rise angle | 32 deg | est. | Low | Side photo | Running Warehouse | 2026-10-04 |
| Rocker rise angle | 33 deg | est. | Medium | Side photo | Running Warehouse | 2026-10-04 |
| Toe tip over ground | 46 mm | est. | Medium | Side photo | Running Warehouse | 2026-10-04 |
| Toe tip over ground | 47 mm | est. | Low | Side photo | Running Warehouse | 2026-10-04 |
| Rocker angle at toe | 67 deg | est. | Low | Side photo | Running Warehouse | 2026-10-04 |
| Rocker angle at toe | 66 deg | est. | Medium | Side photo | Running Warehouse | 2026-10-04 |
| Visible rocker lift onset | 74.9 % | est. | Low | Side photo | Running Warehouse | 2026-10-04 |
| Visible rocker lift onset | 75.2 % | est. | Medium | Side photo | Running Warehouse | 2026-10-04 |
| Toe spring (relative) | 22.6 % | est. | Medium | Side photo | Running Warehouse | 2026-10-04 |
| Toe spring (relative) | 22.7 % | est. | Low | Side photo | Running Warehouse | 2026-10-04 |
| Heel bevel length | 12.2 % | est. | Medium | Side photo | Running Warehouse | 2026-10-04 |
| Heel bevel length | 11.8 % | est. | Medium | Side photo | Running Warehouse | 2026-10-04 |
| Heel bevel height | 25 mm | est. | Low | Side photo | Running Warehouse | 2026-10-04 |
| Heel bevel height | 24 mm | est. | Medium | Side photo | Running Warehouse | 2026-10-04 |
| Midsole width (forefoot) | 125.7 mm | Measured | Medium | Lab test | RunRepeat | 2026-10-04 |
| Midsole width (heel) | 103.7 mm | Measured | Medium | Lab test | RunRepeat | 2026-10-04 |
| Toe box shape | 76 % | est. | Low | Top photo | Running Warehouse | 2026-10-04 |
| Toe box shape | 73 % | est. | Low | Top photo | Running Warehouse | 2026-10-04 |
| Interior forefoot width | 94.6 mm | Measured | Medium | Lab test | RunRepeat | 2026-10-04 |
| Toebox width | 72.7 mm | Measured | Medium | Lab test | RunRepeat | 2026-10-04 |
| Longitudinal stiffness | 79 | Derived | Medium | Lab flex test | RunRepeat | 2026-10-04 |
| Midsole firmness | 44 | Derived | Medium | Lab durometer | RunRepeat | 2026-10-04 |
Classes: Manufacturer stated · Externally measured · AI estimated · Derived · User reported. Hover a method for its identifier and algorithm version.
Source notes
- Running Warehouse: sha256=3a17bac0f713ef7f1577f30c8b6e7d81acd80f5c9788f16a80c42a511cc0cbf6; 0.3
- Running Warehouse: sha256=cd334e07a6f87c1a34282388752a954fb3230aab00271705e96d752f5bfed885; 0.3
- Running Warehouse: sha256=4d1330cb91325f34838f0990b4bc99eab6ed65f958d56ad9d6817b759e7c47c7; 0.3
- Running Warehouse: sha256=af2b0bfc614c503cf60c8638dacff36b27ee8669bf5094e33367fda1f29f6d5b; 0.3
- Running Warehouse: sha256=cb857c433f41fc5d582a8faa0c21ae1a4aeb02a4215a801c07b5093e20582d28; 0.1
- Running Warehouse: sha256=9704a602cdf386ce1b81fef3631b9ea7640245bcc4750be6cc9743fa6f640980; 0.1
Shoes with similar geometry
Compare these →Closest current models from other lines by stack, drop, rocker, toe height, stiffness, firmness, weight and width, whichever both shoes have.
- Drop
- 6 mm
- Heel
- 47 mm
- Toe rocker
- 33%
Very close on every shared measure
- Drop
- 6 mm
- Heel
- 44 mm
- Toe rocker
- 33%
vs this shoe: 4 mm lower heel · 6 mm narrower base
- Drop
- 6 mm
- Heel
- 45 mm
- Toe rocker
- 32%
vs this shoe: 7 mm narrower base · 3 mm lower heel
- Drop
- 6 mm
- Heel
- 45 mm
- Toe rocker
- 36%
vs this shoe: 7 mm narrower base · 26 g lighter · firmer foam